Forum Topic

Is This Assault?

At 430pm today My 14yr old daughter took my 9yr old niece and 8yr old son downstairs to Tesco to spend their Pocket money when they were followed everywhere by the Security Officer, he put his hands on both the young ones legs, he put his hand on my nieces Hip and Pulled my son by the arm and was Poking him.He then started calling my niece by name (as he herd my daughter say it), he said that he was playing as my Niece reminded him off his sister.My Niece was crying and is really scared she has said to her mum she is frightened " The man is going to get her"My son was so scared he hit out to get him off him.How dare a security office treat young children like this not to mention putting his hands on 2 young children is wrong.I have emailed the area Manager Craig Williams, we are all very angry about this and we hope this doesn't happen to another young child down there.

Simon Anderson ● 6012d75 Comments

To the two users who just sent me private emails.You are right if Clo, Kevin, Andy etc are so determined to waste their days on coming on here with Sly comments about me then they must have VERY sad Life's and must be VERY interested in me.I am now going to take your advice when you said that they are getting their wish with me Retaliating, so i am going to do what you suggest "rise" above the comments ignore them and if they want to continue with it then let them get on with it, it will show that i am being More Grown up and Sensible then them.Thanks 4 your advice i am no longer going to interact with them from Now on!!!

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

Put your handbag away love.

Clo Ryan ● 5986d

Ohhh Clo is Back the MOST gobbiest Vile nasty irritation u can get.Clo i would rather have a cuppa with Chlamydia than u..U silly little Woman..Go and Get yourself a life and a Attitude adjustment!!!Ohh at least i dont talk out off my A**e....

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

FranI am used to it by now it just go's over the Head Hunni.Hope u have a Great Xmas x

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

Not the case!! I just don't like someone putting their hands on my Son or Niece for no Reason got it!!! or do i have o keep repeating myself??

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

No u won the awards for them Pal and the Biggest joker award

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

Not unfair Im afraid - the man brings it all upon himself for being such a squealing little imbecile.  If you dont agree with him he starts whinging and throwing his toys out of his pram.  Always has always will.He should get a life, get a job and get a personality transplant.  Hes not eductated enough to know his a**e from his elbow.And no Simon, Im not a fan, I dont want a cup of tea I just wish you'd put a bl**dy sock in it once and for all and disappear off the face of this forum.ARE YOU GOING TO SUE ME TOO - GO AWAY, YOUR BORING! And dont bother stalking me on facebook again thanks.

Clo Ryan ● 5986d

Deary me.Everyone seems to have forgotten that Simon started this thread due to children being really upset.  Simon started this topic by requesting advise.  The majority of replies seem to be personal insults to Simon.Unfair.

Fran Naughton ● 5986d

Most likely to have kids grow up thinking they are hard done by and everyone is out to get them somehow?

Andy Webb ● 5986d

Not 'most hated' Simon, just maybe 'most stupid' or 'most overwrought'...better luck with the 2010 award.

Colin Murphy ● 5986d

I just won the Brentford Tw8 Forum User most hated person award, thank you to all those who voted for me (to many to mention) i just like to say Commiserations goto the 2 runners up Dave Hughes and Robin Taylor..Better Luck next year...lol

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

Retired Comedian? Cant be retired Moaner as u still at it....

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

I'm retired.

Colin Murphy ● 5986d

Colin, Colin, Colin u don't have make me Laugh god i do hope u win the best comedy award this year u deserve it!!!Question 4 u.... u keep banging on that i "Could" be unemployed What do u do i mean u have alot off time also to be on here all day.

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

You do realise that your behaviours will have a good chance of affecting his development?

Colin Murphy ● 5986d

AlanI meant in a way they shouldn't be...If you were grabbing a child to save them from a car or if you were in Town and you saw a child crying because it lost his/her mum or dad then thats very reasonable.What i don't think is right is what the security guard has done, the children go in that shop every day.All i will say Alan i respect your opinion, but i have my opinion to some parents will agree with me some will disagree thats fine but you have to respect that my sister and I do not wish our children to be touched by a stranger, we have brought up our children to not talk to strangers if we were to say to them there is nothing wrong with someone they don't know to touch them and a stranger see's them and says come into my card and holds there hand they will think its OK.Look this is my son and i am VERY protective over him so i don't see why i should be criticized over this but again i respect your opinion.

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

Long, detailed and exhaustive reply. Thanks.Of course, my only point was to challenge what Simon seemed to be saying - that no adult should ever touch a child they did not know. That struck me as an over-reaction which was worth challenging.I did not intend to challenge whether the parents in this case were over-reacting or right to be upset.

Alan Clark ● 5986d

Hi Alan.I think what you say makes a lot of sense and indeed it would be a sad day if an adult could not approach or touch a child without being accused of Assault. However on the other hand I can understand that this parent is very upset and beleives that their child has been Assaulted.I think therefore that this matter is best left to the Police and really in the interest of justice has no place on a public web site, as for the orignal posters question:Is This Assault this can only be answered by the courts and quite how they would decide this is beyond me given the law on Assault.Which is:There is a fundamental and incontestable principle that every person’s body is inviolate. It has long been established that any touching of another person, however slight, may amount to a battery. So Holt CJ held in 1704 that ‘the least touching of another in anger is a battery’: see Cole v Turner 6 Mod Rep 149, 90 ER 958. In Wilson v Pringle [1986] EWCA Civ 6 (26 March 1986) it was held that for a battery the “touching must be proved to be a hostile touching”.Croom-Johnson LJ said: “Hostility cannot be equated with ill-will or malevolence. It cannot be governed by the obvious intention shown in acts like punching, stabbing or shooting. It cannot be solely governed by an expressed intention, although that may be strong evidence. But the element of hostility, in the sense in which it is now to be considered, must be a question of fact for the tribunal of fact. It may be imported from the circumstances. Take the example of the police officer in Collins v Wilcock. She touched the woman deliberately, but without an intention to do more than restrain her temporarily. Nevertheless, she was acting unlawfully and in that way was acting with hostility.” The term ‘unlawful’ as applied to assault in certain contexts may mean no more than ‘without consent’. In criminal law, the term "common assault" covers two separate offences "assault" and "battery" which were formerly contrary to Common Law but are now said to be statutory offences contrary to section 39 Criminal Justice Act 1988: an "assault" is any act by which a person intentionally or recklessly causes another to apprehend immediate unlawful violence; a "battery" is any act by which a person intentionally or recklessly applies unlawful force to another. The term “assault” is sometimes used e.g. in section 47 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (Assault occasioning actual bodily harm). Common assault is usually a summary offence but under section 40 Criminal Justice Act 1988 it can be included as an additional charge on an indictment. Assault: there must be an act See: (Director of Public Prosecutions v Santa-Bermudez [2003] EWHC 2908 (Admin)) accompanied by a hostile intent calculated to cause apprehension in the mind of the victim. Where the hostile intent is not present, there will be no assault (See: Lamb R v [1967 2 QB 981 (22 June 1967) and Archbold 19-166) unless it is proved that the defendant was reckless as to whether the complainant would apprehend immediate and unlawful violence.

Robert Ayres ● 5986d

"its a No win No fee Solocitor"So you're after cash.  From who exactly?

Andy Webb ● 5986d

4got to ask are you and Colin going to collect your award this year at the British Comedy Awards in London herd you were getting the Best Comedy Act....

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

Ohh i hope you come to the Tw8 get together aswell Stephanie i can get u and Colin to sign your Double act comedy DVD and your Patronizing, Nasty get a Life DVD!!If u ain't to busy taking photos that is.BIG round off applause for Queen Joker Stephanie...Hurrayyyyyyyy........Keep it up u guys because u make me laugh (well after i throw up after reading your nasty vile no point comments) now Choke on that Slappy nuts!!

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

ColinI am looking forward to shaking your hand at the TW8 get together my friend i really am and ask you to sign your new Comedy DVD!!!!From your No 1 fan

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

Adamthough i respect your Views, the reason i posted it was to ask the Question was it an assualt?Simon

Simon Anderson ● 5986d

ah, see this is a common misconception. You see my dear Colin, while this thread IS of the genus 'surrealus unemployedum' it is actually a closer in relation to the 'facebook' species.Meaning - close, but it's a little bit more like the surreal, unemployed facebook thread.Hold on tight, we're all going on a surrealist ramble!

Stephanie Kitsune ● 5986d

Is this a re-run of the surreal, unemployed dog thread or the surreal, unemployed housing thread?Well done Simon (and alter egos) for keeping up the site traffic stats.

Colin Murphy ● 5986d

Karen,With respect your family can't have it both ways - on the one hand saying well done to Simon for posting this on a public forum, on the other asking people not to comment if they don't agree.None of us are in possession of the facts, we weren't there.  Nor were you.  And before you say anything, do not take that as an indication I think the children, I am simply stating the fact that only those who were there know for certain what happened.Personally (and it's just my opinion) I don't think Simon should have started this thread for precisely that reason, none of us were there, and none of us are experts on what definitely does/does not constitute 'assault'.  If your family were satisfied in their own minds that what the children said had occurred had occurred as they said, and your family felt that constituted assault, the matter should have been reported to the police and a solicitor, and not on a public forum.  Each to their own, but personally I'd want to keep any issues involving my family private, and if I thought there was a genuine risk to wider society I still wouldn't be posting allegations about an individual on a public website, I'd leave every individual to form their own opinion based upon their own experiences.

Adam Beamish ● 5986d

KarenWe know as does our Children know what happen, i believe too they are covering themselves as they do have CCTV down there and it DOES work because a member off staff told me the other day.I believe Stephanie Kitsun owes you, me and or children an apology for suggesting they were Liars, Troublemakers and shoplifters.Ohh Stephanie just to inform you the solicitor is not getting Legal aid its a No win No fee Solocitor.....But we wont hold our Breath on you Apologizing because you are VERY good at Making accusations against me aint you.?

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

hi i am the mother of the 9 year old girl and the auntie of the 8 year old boy that is involved in the tescos abuse i would like to say well done simon for putting this forum up at least you have the guts to do it to warn others anyway the children are deffinetly not lying i was told by tescos they have cctv all over the shop in and out now they are telling the police they dont have cctv of were the assult happend to be honest with you all i think they are trying to save themselfs as if it got out not many people would go in there anymore the security guard admitted what he did to the kids he had his hand on the top of my daughters thigh near her privates aswell as pulled on her leg and he poked her 2 times and he also pulled and poked my nephew and pulled his arm in my mind that is abuse  the police are useless as they wont do nothing and nor will tescos i no longer go in there myself and my daughter is a very brave girl so is my nephew for telling us also my daughter is very frightend at the moment she sleeps next to me at night and she wont go sleep with out me in the room and she has to have the light on she is now waking nearky every night with bad dreams she also has to help me lock my flat up as she thinks the man is comming for her she will not go tescos with me anymore and when we go out she wont go away from me she is going to be having counselling very soon because of all this please dont sit there saying anything about it untill you have facts also dont say this is because simon has some sort of problem with tescos i dont want anyone arguing about this anymore i am already stressed out and ill cause of all this and what my child is going through i am getting no sleep at night i havent since it happend so please will you all leave simon alone and if you got nothing nice to say then dont comment thanks

Karen Cousins ● 5987d

Hi RobertAt last someone who talks séance Thank You so Much its good to hear some good Advice on this which is what i asked for in the first place.I will take your good advice and do that Thank You Robert Much appreciated.Simon

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

StephanieAll i will say is you are a vile, Nasty bitter person who don't deserve my time or my Reply.I have informed my Sister about your comments about her daughter so if she wants to make a comment to u its up to her.But DON'T you EVER dare say i am using this as an Excuse i take my child being Upset VERY seriously it is called being a Good parent.Not to Mention that the security company and Tesco have taken this seriously by removing the guy from the store, The Police officer stated the only reason they cant take action is because the CCTV wasn't working but don't YOU ever call my son or Niece Trouble makers, Liars or thiefs...No u don't use your mouth because u use your arse to talk crap out off.

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

The answer to your question is yes this is Assault. If I were in your position. I would ask to see a Senior officer at the Police station and insist that this matter is investigated properly. The fact that the CCTV was not working has no bearing on the matter. What does is the wordof your 14 year old daughter who in law is held to be of aresponsible age and so her allegation should be taken seriously.

Robert Ayres ● 5987d

See, there we go again. I didn't call your kids shoplifters I said it sounds like the security guard thought they might be (and that would make me a moron how?). Just another excuse to try and invent another little bit of excitement, teamed with the fact that you don't read.If you want people to keep their opinions to themselves, don't  come on a public forum and ask for them.CapsLock = autopilot for 'badass'?And by the way I believe you mean 'nasty vile fingers' I don't tend to use my mouth when I type. Moron.

Stephanie Kitsune ● 5987d

PS NOW U GO CRAWL UNDER YOUR ROCK...SADDO!!!!!!!!!!!

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

HOW DARE U CALL MY SON AND NIECE SHOPLIFFTERS..WHO IS THE MORON NOW!!SO YOU ARE SAYING MY SON AND NIECE ARE LIARS, SHOPLIFTERS, TROUBLE MAKERS?U SAD PATHETIC WOMAN GET A LIFE AND KEEP YOUR NASTY RUBBISH OPINIONS TO YOURSELF OR BE BRAVE AND COME SIT DOWN AND ACCUSE MY SISTER AND MY KIDS THE THINGS YOU HAVE ACCUSED THEM FF TO OUR FACES INSTEAD OFF HIDING BEHIND EMAILS WITH YOUR NASTY VILE MOUTH.

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

Message removed

Stephanie Kitsune ● 5987d

If u were trying to protect a child or make them safe NO i would not call u a Pedo as i don't know you so it would NOT be right to do so...I don't understand why everyone keeps bringing up the word "Pedophile" because i have NEVER at any stage said the Security Guard was a "Pedo" i don't know the Man but...it seems weird what he did and scared the children!!This is my last reply on it now i just hope you are clear i was not nor wood i call u or anyone else that i Don't know a "pedophile" as it is a serious accusation to make about anyone without evidence.

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

Simon, your previous post states that I claim you are calling me a pedo. It does not. It supposes that in one circumstance you would do this. This is a different statement - it is supposition not reference to a historic event. Therefore I assumed you had only glanced through my post rather than correctly understood it - hence my suggestion that you re-read my post so that you can make an informed response.

Alan Clark ● 5987d

Suggest u read mine.....

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

Suggest you re-read my post.

Alan Clark ● 5987d

No i did NOT call u a "Pedo" so stop your accusations!!!My child and Niece were NOT misbehaving so it gives the security Guard any right to place his hands on them.I ain't going argue with u i will just say this I would NOT put my hands on a child i did not know and i certainly wont have anyone touching my Child innocently or not and i will defend my child fully and u or no one else with change my views on this.Shaking a child's Hand and touching their leg or Hip is FAR different don't u think.....this is my last word on it as we are going around in circles so don't try and push me for another reply.

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

No, what I'm saying is that your statement seemed to be implying that there are no circumstances when it is suitable for an adult to touch a child they do not know. If that is what you are saying, then my view is that this is further promoting an environment where people feel unable and unwilling to approach let alone touch children. We are close to a paranoid state where any contact with any child (other than immediate family) is tainted with the concept of abuse or sexualised. We risk imposing this paranoid onto the next generation and removing our natural tactile human nature completely. And worse, to approach a child today means you risk being called a pervert ... by that child.You ask if I would just hug any child I saw. This is a sad reaction of taking an extreme example and does your case no service. No, of course I would not. But I would reserve the right to man-handle a child I thought was misbehaving or in danger. I would expect to be able to gently push a child to one side if they were in the way and refusing to acknowledge a request (children do seem to be thick and inconsiderate these days). I would hope to be able to shake hands with a child if the circumstances arose - probably combined with a pat on the shoulder. I would expect to be able to approach and comfort a distressed child.Unfortunately my impression is you would be standing across the street shouting 'pedo' at me. Or have I misunderstood you?

Alan Clark ● 5987d

sure

Andy Webb ● 5987d

Wont they is that why we have a Solicitor dealing with this???

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

A lawyer won't touch this, so I wouldn't waste your time. Just leave it alone and move onto the next crusade

Andy Webb ● 5987d

I will say this for the last time so maybe YOU will understand this time.I NEVER SAID HE SEXUALLY ASSAULTED THE CHILDREN!!!!!And the action my sister and i want taken is between us and our Solicitors now so no point in asking me again.

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

So why would you want to touch a Child you DON'T know for?I never said he did it in a Sexual way i asked if it was an assault which the Police thought it was to investigate.Are you saying its OK to walk down the Street see a child you DON'T know and just walk up to him/her and give them a Hug????

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

Ohhh Stephanie my number one fan.I NEVER said u were a PERVERT get YOUR facts correct before the accusations.I NEVER called the SECURITY man a RAPIST so GET your Facts correct AGAIN...This man put HIS hands on my Niece and Son's legs (the Bottom) then put his hand on my Niece's Hip, then puled my son and started to poke his finger at him are you saying this is reasonable behavior off someone you don't know?Are you saying if you took your child out you would allow a stranger come up and do your child's coat up?There is a saying that we tell our kids "Don't talk to strangers" don't you share the same view.You are a very strange person to think it is ok for a complete Stranger to come up and put his/her hands on your Child i will tell my Sister about your last comment as its clear you are accusing my sister off something here.Are you saying you would go up to a child YOU don't know and touch their leg or Hip or hold their arm and start putting your finger into the Child's arm or chest because i know i certainly wouldn't?

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

So you want him fired and on the sex offenders registry?  If not (I've asked several times) what do you see as a satisfactory outcome here?

Andy Webb ● 5987d

AndyFair Comment.No he didn't admit a assault he admitted what the Kids said he did.A "BIGGER" deal then it is...Ummmm we are talking about my 8yr old Son and 9yr old Niece so yes i am making a Bloody BIG deal out off it no 1 puts their hands on them and gets away with it not to mention how upset and scared my Niece was that night and is to scared to go out on the landing to play because she thinks he is coming to get her.So you can say what ever you want about me but don't dare tell me i am in so many words being "pathetic" over this.BTW: i have lots off support from other parents around here who said they would do the same and pursue this too.

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

I'm not sure I'm entirely happy with the notion that no-one can ever touch a child they do not know. And that is the impact of the statement just made above. Surely there are multiple example of when putting your hands (in a non-sexual way) on any child is acceptable? Surely we do not want to create world completely devoid of any tactile behaviour? Surely you are not saying that hugging is wrong?

Alan Clark ● 5987d

Not every male over the age of 30 that plays with a child that is not their own is a paedophile. Some people are just nice.There's clearly a lot of scaremongering that goes on in your house Simon, I don't think anybody is saying your kids are lying but I wouldn't be surprised if they thought somebody was a predatory rapist just for smiling at them or saying hello.Where do you draw the line I wonder? I mean, you already think I'm a pervert for having pictures of my baby in the bath right? So what if the security guard had just spoken to them in a jovial manner? Or is it just that he made physical contact with them? So then what if he'd just shook your little son's hand or helped your niece do up her coat before going outside? Then is he a sexual deviant? You have a very very sad view of the outside world, and a disappointing lack of faith in your fellow man. It's as if you think 1 in 3 people you meet has an inclination to abuse children.If your niece was so afraid of somebody touching her waist that she'd cry and lose sleep over it I suggest she may have been fed some inappropriate information from somewhere which you might want to address, because that's not healthy.

Stephanie Kitsune ● 5987d

So did the manager agree that it was assault?  It's still unclear what you want to happen here. Do you want a guy who's on a low wage to be out of a job?I will say (and you won't like this) that when I first read this, keeping in mind your various posts over the years, I thought it was probably a much bigger deal in your head than it really was and both the police and Tesco just put in the (very thick) Simon Anderson file.Before you get defensive, just ask yourself why a guy who doesn't even know you, but just reads your posts here would think that....

Andy Webb ● 5987d

So u r now calling the children liars? i will have to let my sister know...the security guard admitted what he did in front off the store manager.A stranger should not just walk up to a young child and put his/her hands on them or are you saying they can?

Simon Anderson ● 5987d

Maybe the answer to your question is that it wasn't assault and maybe your children are filled with danger signs in what was normal friendly behaviour and are telling you the story in the way they think you want to hear it? (linking this story to the face book postings and the sorts of conversations your children might have overheard)

Sarah Felstead ● 5987d

Hi RobinHe has a right to ask the question its a Fair Point mate.Its people Like Colin that irritate me, he thinks he knows me with the continuous "Get a Job" line its getting a bit Boring now he doesn't know me or what i do he must lead a VERY sad life to really care what i do in life maybe he will stalk me next.

Simon Anderson ● 5988d

And do you think that none has been taken (internally as Alan suggested)?

Andy Webb ● 5988d

AlanHe has been removed from downstairs and to another shop.

Simon Anderson ● 5988d

AndyTo be Honest with you want some sort off action taken so it doesn't happen to any other child.What would you suggest?

Simon Anderson ● 5988d

Sorry Robin, are you the security guard?

Andy Webb ● 5988d

If you've already made a complaint and had the police asking questions round at Tesco's then you can pretty sure that Tesco's will have taken internal action. They've £3bn of profit and reputation to look after and one little security guard won't be allowed to mess that up. The very least will be a written warning so that they have it on record - but I wouldn't be surprised if he's already out of work. Have you checked to see if he is still around?I'd also be interested to know what you'd want next to happen to this bloke?

Alan Clark ● 5988d

Simon,Don't take any notice of the a***hole who posted the comment at 16:46.

Robin Taylor ● 5988d

What are you hoping to achieve here?  Do you want this guy to go to jail?  Do you want him fired?  An apology maybe?  Some cash?

Andy Webb ● 5988d

Colin Good Luck in getting a LIFE!!!!!

Simon Anderson ● 5988d

Good luck with your jobsearch.

Colin Murphy ● 5988d

Colin.Firstly the children were with my 14yr old daughter in a shop downstairs from me who al the staff know and know me so they are safe but it don't give this security Guard rights to place his hands on children.Have you ever herd off the "Free Legal advice" office in Lampton Rd or Solicitors that go on a "No win no fee"...But hey you will never agree with me anyway if it was your Child would you just let it go??

Simon Anderson ● 5988d

Can you afford legal advice?  Pragmatically, keep unattended young children away from strangers.

Colin Murphy ● 5988d

Just been told by the Police they will not be pursuing this.They say that TESCO CCTV wasn't working (Funny that) and its their word against the children.DISGUSTING our kids can be assaulted and the Police take NO action.If Tesco think they won on this they better think again as i will be seeking Legal advice

Simon Anderson ● 5988d

Hi AdamThanks for your Comments and i just got a letter from the Police saying they are investigating so your right in what you have said.I actually (believe it or not) get on VERY well with the Store manager Suthan, we are always chatting with each other an a couple months ago i watched his back when a drunk Guy tried to steal from the store, then stood in the store abusing him and wouldn't leave so i stood with him to make sure the drunk wasn't Violante and called the Police who took him away, i also made a statement about youth stealing from the store so i do get on with him.As to the area Manager he is OK with me too, but i have to say that in this case its different this is a Grown man putting his hands on 2 young children who admitted to my Sister he did it and said sorry and it should be on CCTV.I would certain not call this incident "something out off nothing" This has Frightened both the Young Children and no grown up has the right to put His/Her hands on your child.If Tesco feel this s me trying to cause Tesco Grief all i can say is thats up to them but Both My sister and myself ain't letting this Go away.

Simon Anderson ● 6008d

You've made a fairly serious allegation Simon.To be fair, in light of the nature of the allegation, I'd expect Tesco and the Police to not reply to you until they'd had a full and proper opportunity to speak to/interview the relevant parties and try to establish the facts.  The alleged assault happened on Saturday, it's only Wednesday today - I wouldn't expect to hear anything until next week.I don't like to raise this, but based upon some of your posts on here in the past about the Tesco store where the alleged assault took place, it seems evident to me the two parties don't exactly 'get on'.  I am not suggesting this for one minute, but a cynic could think "hmm, look at the history between the parties, is Mr. Anderson just making something out of nothing to cause Tesco grief ?".  Certainly if I was in the shoes of the Area Manager I'd want to be as certain as I could be about the exact circumstances of the alleged assault before I responded in any way to you.

Adam Beamish ● 6008d

This is how Serious Tesco and the Police take this type off thing:No Reply from Either the Head Office or the Area Manager Craig Williams or the Police.Disgusting!!!

Simon Anderson ● 6008d

My Sister called the Police Yesterday they want my Son and Niece to do a soft interview about the incident.I emailed Craig Williams the Area Manager but still waiting on Reply and i am contacting the Head Office today.My niece was so scared that she didn't want to come over to my House (i live next door) without an adult bringing her.

Simon Anderson ● 6010d

Yes and gross misconduct

George Knox ● 6010d

I’m uneasy reading this. I hope things are resolved for you and your family, Simon.For about a tenner, you can request copies of the CCTV footage.

Fraser Pearce ● 6010d

Should have contacted the Police. Sounds like assualt.

Neil Chippendale ● 6010d

Being charitable, he needs some training. Worst case could be rather more sinister.

Colin Murphy ● 6012d