Forum Topic

Who cares where they live. What matters is do they do a good job and are they honest. Judge them on the facts.Fact: They had to repay money they claimed to which they were not entitled.Fact: In 2007-2008 Keen had previously hit the headlines having the highest expenses claim of any MP excluding transport costs (which disproportionately affect MPs from remote constituencies), claiming a total of £167,306 for the financial year. In total the Keens have claimed almost £1.7million in expenses over seven yearsFact:On 28 January 2009, Keen voted against a Conservative motion in Parliament opposing expansion of Heathrow Airport and urging the government to review a decision to add a third runway. Keen had claimed to be opposed to expansion at Heathrow for many years; her website stated in 2007 that "one of her most successful campaigns was against the Third Runway at Heathrow." Friends of the Earth said she had "betrayed her constituents."Fact:Keen and her MP husband Alan Keen used their combined second homes allowances to buy an apartment in an up-market development at Waterloo on the South Bank of the River Thames, claiming £175,000 over five years. The Waterloo apartment is nine miles from their constituency home in Brentford, a 30-minute drive from Westminster.MPs who reside near the Keens in Brentford, such as Home Office Minister Phil Woolas who lives in the next street, are able to commute from there to Westminster. The couple claimed for both the interest payments on the Waterloo flat and the cost of re-mortgaging their Brentford home. The Fees Office agreed with the couple's argument that this was claimable because it was used to raise equity for the flat. The mortgage also included the cost of "compulsory" life insurance attached to the mortgages, a practice which is now banned.

Robert Ayres ● 5592d

You are probably mistaken Michael.The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards judged that the breach in the rules was only from June 2009 to October 2009 - the situation had then returned to normal with Brentford being the "main home". Otherwise he would presumably have sought repayment of another £1400 per month (or whatever might be claimed in expenses for the flat at Waterloo Towers - I don't think we have seen that the Keens have yet claimed for anything for the financial year -starting April 2009 - perhaps they saved up their bills until the end of the tax year. Indeed the statements for 1st April to 30th June 2009 athttp://mpsallowances.parliament.uk/mpslordsandoffices/hocallowances/allowances-by-mp/ann-keen/Ann_Keen_0910_PAAE.pdfandhttp://mpsallowances.parliament.uk/mpslordsandoffices/hocallowances/allowances-by-mp/ann-keen/Ann_Keen_0910_PAAE.pdfboth show £0 was claimed - although the Commissioner noted that the claims for 2009/10 to 20th July wereMortgage £5000Council Tax £823Service Charge £2531Telephone £77Total  £8431I guess that the claims were made in July after the end date of the first quarter statement at the end of June."22. We conclude that Mr and Mrs Keen were in breach of the rules of the House becausefor a period of four months they claimed allowances for a second home when they onlyhad one home available to them. This breach is significantly mitigated in our view bythe approval given by the Department of Resources, by the lack of any evidence that Mrand Mrs Keen intended to procure for themselves a personal benefit, and by verydifficult circumstances beyond their control. For the reasons the Commissioner hasgiven, we consider this breach to have begun in June 2009 and to have ended in October2009. Our estimate of the sum claimed as PAAE by both Mr and Mrs Keen in relation tothat period is £5,678 (ie, four sixths of the total PAAE claims paid to both of them inrespect of the first six months of 2009–10)."http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmstnprv/453/453.pdf

Tim Henderson ● 5595d

I'm surprised that they have moved again.Only on 19th January did they tell that nice Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, John Lyon that they were back residing in Brentford for four nights a week and so it was their "main home". :http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmstnprv/453/453.pdfAgreed Note of Interview with Mr Alan Keen MP and Mrs AnnKeen MP, 19 January 2010JL Have you now returned to your previous pattern of overnight stays - four nights a week inBrentford?Mrs Keen YesEarlier she had said how inconvenient it was to have to spend all their time at the Waterloo flat :JL Looking back, what would you say to the suggestion that you could have got back to your houseearlier had you not been able to live in your London flat?Mrs Keen I would not agree.Our lives were so disrupted, sometimes I was back and forth two or three times in one day. Ihad to change in a local hotel. It would have been much more convenient to be at our home.Usually I would be at home in the gap after my Friday advice surgery. But I couldn’t do that.It is much more convenient to be in our main home. In our London flat we don’t have peoplearound, we can’t have family there.Mr Keen We have had no social life since we can’t invite anyone back.At the moment we are still allowed to claim for the flat. I am claiming against the allowancesfor the London flat for this half the year. For the first half of the year, Ann claimed. But thisallowance is set to stop altogether for us. So we will have to decide what to do.With all the electioneering that is being done, Ann must be using a base in the constituency.

Tim Henderson ● 5597d