Forum Topic

Isleworth Residents March to Save Our Library and Public Hall - Saturday, 19th February, 10.45 am

Dear FriendYou may be aware that as part of a massive programme of budget cuts it has been proposed that Isleworth Library, along with up to seven others, may be closed.Isleworth only reopened a couple of weeks ago!!!As if that wasn't enough, Isleworth Public Hall is also under serious threat.  In fact anywhere where members of the community can get together and speak to one another seems to be very much on the hit list.The London Borough of Hounslow is now saying that it will delay any cuts to the library service and will also push back its plans for the Public Hall.  BUT NEITHER ARE SAFE !!!!Hounslow still wishes to make a saving in excess of £800k and has yet to think of an alternative to the library closures.That is why members and friends of our community will be holding a MARCH from Isleworth Library to Isleworth Public Hall on Saturday, 19th February 2011 at 10.45 am.This friendly and good-natured activity is being supported across the community by people of all age groups and all backgrounds.  It has been organised by a cross-section of residents from The Isleworth Society (TIS), the Community Group (ICG) and Friends of Isleworth Public Hall, as well as many freelance campaigners and well-wishers.  It is intended as a short but potent demonstration of our community's robust opposition to the proposed cuts.Meet up outside Isleworth Library at 10.45 am.  We will be staging a brief celebration of the opening of the new library before the march.Refreshments will be available at the Public Hall from 11.30 am, where you will also be able to sign a petition.  If for any reason you are unable to attend the march, please make your way straight to the Public Hall.We want to put on a real show of strength.  Please do your very best to join us on the march at 10.45 on February 19th.See you there!Phil Andrewson behalf of Save Our Libraries LBH

Phil Andrews ● 5295d21 Comments

Looks like the coalition is beginning to have a real difference of opinion - 91 Lib Dem councillors have found their wedding tackle - hoo - bloody - ray!From "i" the new newspaper on the 8th:"Some in No. 10 are adamant that councils should make efficiency savings rather than cut grants to community groups. Cameron made this point at last week's PMQs and it is a valid one. But Cameron cannot do very much about the way councils choose to implement cuts. He has argued that his 'Big Society' is a form of localism. Nick Clegg has declared his support on precisely the grounds that the vision is another form of localism. They can hardly tell councils what to do from the centre having insisted that they wish the centre to do less................If No.10 were staffed on the scale of the White House. if the Cabinet Office became a mighty machine and Cameron's new director of communications behaved like Alastair Campbell on speed, the policy still could not work when Sure Start centres and libraries are closing, and the voluntary sector is being cut, in front of people's eyes.There is such a thing as society.Sometimes the state is a necessary binding agency even if it is an inefficient one. Only in Britain is there an enduring fantasy that services can improve with less investment. The day Cameron and Osborne opted for sweeping cuts was defining one with a thousand consequences. One of them is brutally clear. The decision killed off the 'Big Society' and no relaunches or 'revolutionary chiefs' can save it as the axe falls."That I think says it all, these cuts are idealogical and talk of charities and voluntary groups running things is ridiculous if you don't support them with government money. Either way - local councils or voluntary sector -services cost.

Vanessa Smith ● 5293d

VanessaYou sound like Robin Taylor when you make ridiculous references to Tories in Hammersmith and Fulham being "my mates". Do either of you understand that it is possible for a person to be critical of certain things the Labour Party does from time to time and still not be a paid-up member of the Tory Party?Believe it, there's a whole wide world out there filled with people who are not robotic, uncritical followers of EITHER party.  Can you get that?  Folks like your good self are actually very much in the minority.Amusingly, the only conversation I have ever had with a Conservative councillor from H&F was when I encountered one of them at a regional Housing meeting when I was Lead Member.  He regaled me with the news that the Hounslow Conservatives were going to "kick those independents out on their arse" by winning an overall majority in May 2010 and told me what an especially awkward and unpleasant person this Phil Andrews was.  I did think to tell him something he ought to know, but decided against as he seemed to have rather a lot to impart to me.Anyway, if there is a public announcement that the libraries are safe for the duration of this administration, not just for the next few months, then we will deal with that if/when it happens.  Until it happens the march goes ahead, and I doubt whether many people will read this forum and stay away on the basis of your so-far unsubstantiated news.I invited you to attend because a few weeks ago you stated on this forum, or possibly it was W4.com, that you would support a campaign against library closures.  Then suddenly you began to sing another tune.  I didn't realise the party whip extended to non-councillors, although would I be right in sensing that you are positioning yourself for a return?Stranger things have happened.  But who will be asked to give way?

Phil Andrews ● 5294d