Forum Topic

Legalisation of drugs could save UK £14bn, says study

The regulated legalisation of drugs would have major benefits for taxpayers, victims of crime, local communities and the criminal justice system, according to the first comprehensive comparison between the cost-effectiveness of legalisation and prohibition. The authors of the report, which is due to be published today, suggest that a legalised, regulated market could save the country around £14bn.For many years the government has been under pressure to conduct an objective cost-benefit analysis of the current drugs policy, but has failed to do so despite calls from MPs. Now the drugs reform charity, Transform, has commissioned its own report, examining all aspects of prohibition from the costs of policing and investigating drugs users and dealers to processing them through the courts and their eventual incarceration.As well as such savings is the likely taxation revenue in a regulated market. However, there are also the potential costs of increased drug treatment, education and public information campaigns about the risks and dangers of drugs, similar to those for tobacco and alcohol, and the costs of running a regulated system.The report looked at four potential scenarios, ranging from no increase in drugs use to a 100% rise as they become more readily available."The conclusion is that regulating the drugs market is a dramatically more cost-effective policy than prohibition and that moving from prohibition to regulated drugs markets in England and Wales would provide a net saving to taxpayers, victims of crime, communities, the criminal justice system and drug users of somewhere within the range of, for the four scenarios, £13.9bn, £10.8bn, £7.7bn, £4.6bn."Titled a Comparison of the Cost-effectiveness of the Prohibition and Regulation of Drugs, the report uses government figures on the costs of crime to assess the potential benefits and disadvantages of change. The document, co-written by Steve Rolles, head of research at Transform, uses home office and No 10 strategy unit reports to form its conclusions.It finds: "The government specifically claims the benefits of any move away from prohibition towards legal regulation would be outweighed by the costs. No such cost-benefit analysis, or even a proper impact assessment of existing enforcement policy and legislation has ever been carried out here or anywhere else in the world."Taxing drugs would also provide big revenue gains, says the survey. An Independent Drug Monitoring Unit estimate, quoted in the report, suggests up to £1.3bn could be generated by a £1 per gram tax on cannabis resin and £2 per gram on skunk.The report follows calls for legalisation or a full debate on reform. Last month, the Economist concluded: "Prohibition has failed; legalisation is the least bad solution."

Philip Walsh ● 5272d2 Comments

I agree with you Philip that legalisation is the only sensible way forward for drug policy.However, I do have serious concerns about cannabis use and feel that there is too little balance in the arguments put forward by both sides of the debate. Protagonists seem to coalesce around one of two poles - the cannabis is completely safe pole and the "reefer madness" pole.As a youth worker for 40 years, I became increasingly concerned about what I perceived (from my personal experience) as a definite link between heavy cannabis use at a young age and the development of anxiety disorders and, more worryingly paranoid schizophrenia. Now my view was not biassed in any way - I don't use and have never used cannabis, but the majority of my friends do (or have) and I have always supported legalisation as the only logical answer to the drug problem. My concern was simply based initially upon longitudinal observation of groups of young people with whom I worked over long periods of time, and latterly upon discussions I have had with several clinical psychologists working in mental health wards. My concerns, and those of many others in my former profession were often belittled by the pro-cannabis lobby and a variety of explanations were trotted out to challenge the scientific validity of any research done on the issue. Then on Wednesday this week, the British Medical Journal published an article detailing a 10 year research project involving 1900 subjects which appeared to show clearly that even when controlling for existing psychiatric conditions, young people who use cannabis are doubling the risk of experiencing psychotic symptoms.It seems to me that at least some of the energy that goes into trying to convince society at large that cannabis is "safe" would be better spent educating young people about the danger of long term heavy use at a young age.

Mick Brent ● 5272d