Forum Topic

Philip, Many thanks for a fine article, I have in fact looked up Cannabis on the Net and found that in some Medical Conditions it has proved invaluable(I have to be completely honest with you I find any drug abhorrent(that's my choice) I really don't know enough about the use of Cannabis, I will leave that(this is with respect) in your expert hands. Hypothetically if I were to smoke a small amount of cannabis on a daily basis than according to Charley Walker I would become psychotic and yet if I were to snort(I believe that's the right word or shoot up( I'm getting good)with Heroin than I would be okay. What a load of B*ll Shite!!! I was around in the 60's when LSD was the one to try I know of  people who unfortunately are still flying high, they just never came back from there trip, so many lives and families touched with sorrow because it was the thing to do at the time. So Charley states that Cocaine will destroy the Septum and leave the brain alone again a load of BS, if he advocates hard drugs being better for kids than Cannabis then he should be sacked out of hand. Do you know what I cannot understand the last administration permitted the use of Cannabis in certain areas of London and yet it is outlawed elsewhere,Why??? or has the law been altered.As for Mental Illness being predisposed to Genes a load of rubbish, life and it's problems bring that about unfortunately. I think it quite disgraceful for Doctor's to prescribe drug's to youngsters because of behavior problems,when I was a child you did as you were told no argument(children were to be seen but not heard)naughty kids does not appear to be in our vocabulary any longer we make excuses, giving kids drugs for behavior problems is to my mind the start to a ruined life in all probability of drug abuse. Show kids just how bad a person looks with a nose worn away through snorting, show them a dead youngster with a needle in his or her arm,toe or finger show them real dirty life and it will hopefully scare the living daylights out of them, if they knew the truth and were not tempted by sweet talk and freebies than we would be so much better off. Let's not allow them to be fooled by how good drug use is supposed to be. Let's show them how it really is DISGUSTING DEGRADING EVENTUALLY IN A LOT OF CASES LEADING TO A VERY UNPLEASANT DEATH. Sky,BBC and any other channel have the ideal opportunity to help youngster's to make the right choices by showing the real life day to day awful existence of a drug addict in the raw. If my grand daughter can be taught Sex Education starting at age 8 in school than so can drug education both are a necessity.

Dawn Hardy ● 5170d

Charles Walker, Tory MP for Broxbourne proposed his adjournment debate in the House of Commons on the evening of Thursday, 9th June 2011.  He was answered by Anne Milton, minister of state for public health. A transcript of the debate is here. Dear Mr Walker,I was in the public gallery of the House of Commons on Thursday evening when you rose to speak on your adjournment debate, “Cannabis and Psychosis (Young People)”.The COMT gene/dopamine theory which suggested that one in four would have a genetic disposition to psychosis if they used cannabis was disproved in 2007 by a team led by Dr Stanley Zammit, one of the world’s foremost authorities on the subject.  It was published in the  British Journal of Psychiatry:  http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/abstract/191/5/402.  Why have you overlooked this crucial evidence which completely refutes the entire basis of your absurd scaremongering about cannabis?You are correct that if cannabis use has a causal effect on psychosis (which is not proven), then children and young people are the group most at risk.  However you seem to have an absolutely colossal blind spot here.  Prohibition does not work.  It provides no control or protection for children or the vulnerable at all.  The only ID that a dealer asks for is a £20 note.  What is absolutely vital for the safety of our children is that the huge, multi-billion pound cannabis market in Britain should be brought under proper control and regulation.  The facts are that wherever cannabis has been brought under some sort of regulated control, consumption and particularly use by children has fallen.Facts were almost completely absent from your speech.  In fact I think we would have to go back to witchcraft before we would find such a submission of misinformation and untruths to parliament.  It really was the most astonishing display of ignorance (a word which I do not use as an insult to you but as a precise and accurate description).  You rely on your “friend” Mary Brett but she is responsible for the distribution of more untruths about cannabis than anyone except perhaps Debra Bell and the Daily Mail.  Cannabis Law Reform (CLEAR) is preparing a formal complaint to the Charity Commission about Ms Brett’s charity Cannabis Skunk Sense.  It cannot be right that an organisation which promotes misinformation, untruths and distorted science should enjoy charitable status.You prefaced your speech by saying that you are not a clinician or a scientist but that cannot excuse your gross distortion of the science.  You spoke untruths and I cannot understand why a man in your position would not check the facts.  The truth about cannabis is easily available online.Your claim that cannabis is now six times stronger than it was in the 70s was not as ridiculous as Nadine Dorries’ suggestion of “50 times stronger” just last week.  Anne Milton underbid you slightly at just four times.  There is no proper evidence for any of these claims.  The cannabis oil available in Victorian times was 43% THC.  Hashish available in the 70s and 80s was around 20% THC.You are correct that the balance of THC and CBD is important and that CBD has powerful anti-psychotic properties.  Prohibition has driven the criminal market to higher THC concentrations and to immature cropping before the CBD has developed.  There is an exact parallel with alcohol prohibition in the US where consumption of beer and wine fell as high strength hooch and spirits became more popular.  The balance restored itself once prohibition ended.With your “one in four” scare story you were attempting to cherry pick evidence to support your position – even evidence that has been disproved.  I do not have to do that.  Professor Glyn Lewis of the University of Bristol conducted a systematic review of ALL the published evidence on the subject so his figures are, by definition, balanced.  He confirmed only last month that “there is no certainty of a causal link between cannabis use and psychosis”.Professor Lewis shows that the risk of psychosis with cannabis use  is between 0.013% and 0.003%, a correlation only: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19832786.  Similar correlation between psychosis and tobacco use is 80%-90%.  Direct proven causation of psychosis by alcohol is 1%-2% (Korsakoff’s syndrome).Keele University also showed in a study of nearly 600,000 subjects that despite increased consumption of cannabis “the incidence and prevalence of psychosis and schizophrenia was stable or declining”: http://www.ukcia.org/research/keele_study/Assessing-the-impact-of-cannabis.pdfThese are scientific facts Mr Walker, unlike the absolute nonsense you spoke in the House.  You brought the whole of British politics and parliament into disrepute by your distortion of the truth.  It is because of people like you and Mary Brett that people of all ages in Britain trust not a word they are told by the government about drugs.  They know from their own experience that all they ever hear are lies.  The Talk to Frank service that you are so fond of is an object of ridicule and contempt amongst young people.  The fact that you seem unaware of this shows how out of touch you are.When towards the end of your speech you said that educators “…need to be aware of the research that shows a strong causal link between skunk cannabis, psychosis and schizophrenia”, you descended into extraordinary, blatant falsehood.  There is no such research and I believe you knew that it was false when you said it.Finally, your suggestion that alcohol or cocaine are safer for children than cannabis, has to be one of the most absurd and irresponsible  statements made by a politician anywhere, ever.  I do not see how you can possibly remain in your position having made such an utterly ridiculous and dangerous statement.  You should resign your position as an MP immediately.  You are a disgrace to parliament and to the country.I am writing to the Deputy Speaker and to the minister, Anne Milton, about your conduct.  Such blatant distortion of the truth should not be allowed in parliament.Yours sincerely,Peter Reynolds

Philip Walsh ● 5170d

Dawn did you re read the words of Charles Walker MP.We can agree that education is important but so is truth and reality over drugs.  Charles Walker is a lair and ex cocaine addict who continues to put out over egged messages about cannabis to detract from his own one time heavy drug use.In the second paragraph he over estimates the level of danger from cannabis; Les Iverson of the ACMD is on record as saying that cannabis (including skunk which is just one of thousands of strains available to consumers) is a very safe drug of little or no known toxicity.  He further stated that to stop 1 young person developing psychosis you would have to stop 20,000 young people from using it.  It is also widely known that one has to be predisposed to the condition for it to develop. However Walker's rant continues in the same theme for a further two paragraphs of scaremongering, which does nothing for our children except make them confused and dismissive of all they are told by politicians. In paragraph five Mr Walker touches on his own drug use but does not elaborate, claiming the same hypocritical defence as the prime minister over his drug use with the phrase "There are things I have done in my past that I am ashamed of and I wish I had not done, but, as the Prime Minister said, everyone is entitled to a pass".  (I believe that should say past).  He then goes on to repeat the kind of rubbish the papers of the 60,s and seventies printed over LSD.  Millions of people world wide have used LSD without blowing holes in their brains; a few people did suffer mainly due to taking very high quantities either deliberately or because of bad production process's that can not guarantee quantifiable levels of ingredients.  In paragraph 6 he makes the casual link claim, this claim has been refuted by the Keele university study carried out on behalf of the government and the ACMD to prove; what it disproved. This study has been deliberately buried by making it only available to academics that can access the universities web site.We can agree that education is important but so is truth and reality over drugs.  Charles Walker is a lair and ex cocaine addict who continues to put out over egged messages about cannabis to detract from his own one time heavy drug use.It is in paragraph eight where he truly shows what kind of moron he is with these words; “however: it is a lot easier to repair a septum in one’s nose than to repair a brain. Once our brain is gone, often the best pharmaceutical drugs in the world will not bring it back again”.  This is a reference to the damage he did to his nose through cocaine use, which despite it's well known and causal link to mental illness (unlike cannabis I know of plenty of people who's coke use screwed up their mind )which Mr Walker appears to argue is better for your children than cannabis!!!!!.  I for one do not think filling children suffering mental problems full of the best pharmaceutical drugs does them any good at all indeed the evidence is that it does not and the use of these drugs is rarely justified; they are a good deal more harmful then cannabis for sure.Reading through what I have put up from Mr Walker I note that a piece from the original speech is not there; in it he quotes from a study of eugenics and uses it to claim that people have a gene that predisposes people to mental illness if they use cannabis.He claims for people with this gene who use cannabis the risk is increased four fold and then claims that if you inherit 2 of these genes one from each parent the risk is ten fold, this study I believe was about cocaine use and has been widely disproved and dismissed as bunkum even when applied to that drug and the study had no relevance to cannabis use.  This is the true problem over drugs; miss informed bigotry given out by the addled minds of ex junkies and hypocrites that sit in parliament and refuse to deal with the issues in a realistic truthful and honest way. As previously stated this man is a miss informed fool.Sorry if this thread got miss directed to drug issues but I didn’t bring it up only responded.

Philip Walsh ● 5171d

Ok I never put up anything negative about cannabis yesterday Charles Walker (Broxbourne, Conservative)made this statement about cannabis. He was in a debate about protection of children and had to be told so; but here it is a very negitive speech to cheer up those that let other people do their Thinking for them;For many young people, smoking skunk cannabis is like holding a loaded gun to their heads. It might not kill them—they may continue to have a life—but if they suffer from severe psychosis or schizophrenia, it will not be much of a life. It might be just an existence.The Government need to get to grips with this, but the problem is that law makers and the clinicians who advise them view cannabis through the prism of their own experiences in the 1970s and 1980s, and, as I said earlier, things have moved on since then. The drug with which we are dealing now is highly toxic and highly dangerous. We must talk not about harm reduction, but about harm prevention.We are responsible adults. I have had enough of the current trend of everyone trying to make adults children’s best friends. I am not my children’s best friend; I am their parent—I am their father and I must guide them and have their interests at heart. That is the duty of adults. We must not abrogate responsibility. We have to make young people aware of the risks they run if they smoke skunk cannabis.I have an admission to make here tonight. I was the beneficiary of very good drugs education at the age of 14 and 15. I was educated in the mid-’80s. I have not lived a blameless life. There are things I have done in my past that I am ashamed of and I wish I had not done, but, as the Prime Minister said, everyone is entitled to a pass. There were many drugs, but the one drug I really did not touch was LSD, because I was told that if we take LSD just once, we can have a bad trip and that can be the end; we may never return from that experience—the gate in our brain that opens up may never close. If we are lucky enough in our youth to survive using it intact as a whole person, we might in our mid-40s—as I am now—be driving our children back from football practice and suddenly start hallucinating again. That terrified me. The idea that I could lose my brain and my future terrified me, and ensured that at a time when LSD was rife in London I never—ever—touched it.Drug education works, but we need to educate the educators. They need to be aware of the research that shows a strong causal link between skunk cannabis, psychosis and schizophrenia. As I have said, our health trusts are full of young people suffering the consequences. Families are being destroyed.I will conclude by saying just a few more words. In an ideal world—let us have lofty ambition and strive for an ideal world—I do not want any youngster to take drugs. It is not a good thing to do; it is not good for their health, their future or their prospects. I will just say this,however: it is a lot easier to repair a septum in one’s nose than to repair a brain. Once our brain is gone, often the best pharmaceutical drugs in the world will not bring it back again—that is it. I have talked to dozens of parents across the country who are facing up to the fact that their children—the children they love, and brought into the world and nurtured—now have no future but simply an existence to look forward to. I do not think that is good enough, and I do not want to settle for it.So here is my call to action for the Government: please take this matter seriously. Skunk cannabis has changed over the past 30 years. It is a major public health risk. It is robbing thousands of people of an opportunity to live fulfilled lives. I have worked with the Minister, and she has been fabulous up to this point, and I am sure she will continue her efforts to get this topic higher up the Department’s agenda.Finally, I want to pay tribute to my enormously good friend, Mary Brett, a former teacher who has worked for decades in the interests of young people and their welfare.This man is a mis informed fool.

Philip Walsh ● 5172d

Your friend didn't use alcohol, smoke toxic cigarettes, drink tea or coffee (caffeen can course psychotic feelings and possibly hallucinations. This from; http://machineslikeus.com/news/can-caffeine-cause-hallucinationsCaffeine is the most commonly used psychoactive drug. Coffee and other caffeinated beverages such as tea, soft-drinks and energy drinks access the stimulant and when taken in large quantities increase tendencies to hallucinate says La Trobe University’s Professor Simon Crowe, School of Psychological Sciences.In a recent study— The effect of caffeine and stress on auditory hallucinations in a non-clinical sample —Professor Crowe and colleagues measured the effect of stress and caffeine with 92 non-clinical participants.Five coffees a day or more was found to be enough to increase the participant’s tendency to hallucinate says Professor Crowe.‘High caffeine levels in association with high levels of stressful life events interacted to produce higher levels of ‘hallucination’ in non-clinical participants, indication that further caution needs to be exercised with the use of this overtly “safe” drug,’ he says.The participants were assigned to either a high or a low stress condition and a high or a low caffeine condition on the basis of self-report. The participants were then asked to listen to white noise and to report each time they heard Bing Crosby’s rendition of “White Christmas” during the white noise.The song was never played. The results indicated that the interaction of stress and caffeine had a significant effect on the reported frequency of hearing “White Christmas." The participants with high levels of stress or consumed high levels of caffeine were more likely to hear the song.‘There is a link between high levels of stress and psychosis, and caffeine was found to correlate with hallucination proneness. The combination of caffeine and stress affect the likelihood of an individual experiencing a psychosis-like symptom,’ says Professor Crowe.This study also helped to explain the mechanism by which stress may facilitate the symptoms of schizophrenia in non-clinical samples. Caffeine has only recently been reported to increase proneness to hallucinate.‘The results also support both the diathesis-stress model and the continuum theory of schizophrenia in that stress plays a role in the symptoms of schizophrenia and that everyone, to some degree, can experience these symptoms. This was demonstrated by a significant effect of stress on the occurrence of hallucinatory experiences, or hearing the song,’ says Professor Crowe.‘It is apparent that the health risks of excessive caffeine use must be addressed and caution should be raised with regards to the exacerbating use of this stimulant,’ he says.I don't feel that I am bigoted just fed up with the fact that when ever I look into the claims made in the press and repeated by those that never look beyond their own noses and prefered drug habits, I find great steaming heaps of bull s**t in the place of fact; the facts never fit the reports.Did you know that cannabis is a drug of little or no known medical value according to the law Yet sativex (classified as cannabis) made from skunk cannabis and containing every thing normal cannabis contains except the fibre is a multi billion pound medicine.Did yoy know that the seed stock purchased with taxpayers money come from the man who made the first skunk plant Skunk#1; the granddaddy of all skunks or that his partner RC Clarke is responsible for educating all the other cannabis seed producers via his book 'Marijuana Botany - The production and breeding of distinctive cannabis'.How about the fact that once our government had bought the 'rights' and genetic linage of 'skunk'; the skunk makes your children mental campaign started.  I currently have freedom of information request and correspondence with the Home office over all these 'Facts'.I am not a bigot I just know an awful lot about my specialist subject.My seed strains are worth millions but I am considered a piece of filth by the same people who handed £10 million pound to the two people largely regarded as the instigators of the indoor cannabis / skunk growing phenomenon and international criminals!!

Philip Walsh ● 5174d