Unless (I am generalizing)you have actually been the head of a vast number of staff, you have no understanding of how an office works, on a weekly basis your accounts staff give actual figures of expenditure to you that were or are a part of your monthly budget forecast, unless your expenditure goes over that budget you as head of your department do not actually see every thousand pounds that has been expended.Each department has a manager plus general manager who have levels of sign off, these in turn end the day in the accounts office. At the end of each fiscal year, auditors come in to audit the accounts also the VAT Inspectors. In actuality you are in charge of this department but have no clear knowledge of the complete breakdown of expenditure, purely because you have had no reason to investigate any wrong doing, because your budget has not been over extended.Your Quote:-She was in these roles during the initial police investigation when, strangely, the police managed to find to case.So you are saying that initially she was guilty of wrong doing if that was the case, then why? has she not now been charged only charged with suspicion of, there is no actual proof, the case that you are talking about was Prince William those 2 chaps went to prison. I appreciate that if you are the head of a dept, then the buck stops here.However what I cannot get my head around is the fact that only the NOW are accused of this alleged phone hacking, when we have a BBC TV film of Piers Morgan confessing to this action whilst working for the Daily Mirror, we have allegedly 1200 hacking allegations against the Daily Mail also other newspapers, why?? is it only the NOW in the frame.Again the Guardian is mentioned as sacrosanct this is a dangerous game that is being played, how can an in depth investigation to only one newspaper be taking place at this moment in time, when nobody in office is questioning where they are receiving this information from. Information that has brought about these dreadful allegations, two wrongs do not make a right. Your Quote:-One may view the so called Sarah's Law as a major step forward in child safety, or as backward step in human rightsAs far as I am concerned no Pedophile or Rapist whether the victim be male or female has no such thing that as human rights, far too much concern is given to the beast who actually commits these dreadful acts, and not enough to the victim or victims family. Do you really think that anything like Sarah's Law would have been pushed through Parliament if not for Mrs Brooks and the NOW plus other papers taking the fight up. They are to be commended not vilified.This is why we must not allow Parliament to take The Freedom of the Press away, what was is Lord Kinnock said they were to be shackled, Ed Miliband and Tom Watson are also in agreement that they must be controlled by Parliament and the House of Lords. Heaven help us if it ever comes to pass.Your Quote:-That's what we elect parliament for.Unfortunately only 15% of all our laws are actually passed through our Houses of Parliament, the other 85% comes through Europe!!I listened to the Lord Justice the other morning on how he was to handle this investigation and was quite impressed until he said that he would decide what we the public should know, that sentence in itself tells me that this will be another inquiry like the Iraq one was, when both the press and public were dismissed from the room because it considered by the powers that it was too secret for the public to know.When you consider that this "quarter"investigation is going to cost we the taxpayers at least 10 Million Pounds, I would hope that nothing will be left out, however as it has already been decided that we will not be told the whole, as far as I am concerned it just looks good politically.Well done to the Telegraph for making public the Expenses Fiasco public, we would never have known otherwise. However they brought the information does this make them crooked?If and I do mean if this investigation was only for the safety and confidentiality of we the people and not a particular political agenda, then Justice would be seen to have been done. Unfortunately for us the outlook does not look good!! I will fight as hard as I have fought this one to enable our FREEDOM OF THE PRESS TO CONTINUE!!!
Dawn Hardy ● 5124d