If they were really serious they would set up a panel of people who were there in one capacity or another.I have a journalist friend a lifelong resident, who was there in Ealing, his home town and what he had told me just a day after was horrific- a mixture of incompetence, attitude and poor leadership. I've seen his pictures and they bear this out.It would be wrong of me to claim this opinion as my own but I personally agree with it.The panel should be made up from ordinary police on the front line, not senior officers most of whom were too far away from the culprits to hear what was being said, journalists or witnesses, residents who were present and affected, firemen who were restricted.They should be completely free to speak from their eyewitness experience and ask questions of their superiors freely and of those from other services.If possible even some of those who were just out spectating and better still some of those involved.But if it ends up (as it seems) being a panel of Bufton Tuftons and career builders and 'experts' who were not actually there, then we will get nowhere apart from have another bill to pay for a load of waffle and missed objectives.
Michael Brandt ● 5351d