Forum Topic

I see the Hounslow Chronicle has picked up the storyHOUNSLOW Labour Party's chief whip has cost council tax payers more than £2,000 per meeting he attended over the last year, the Chronicle can reveal.Jason Ellar made it to just six out of the 16 council meetings he was expected to attend during the past 12 months - just 38 per cent.The Syon ward councillor faced calls this week to return some of the £11,879 in allowances he receives each year, made up of the £9,276 'basic allowance' received by all councillors and the £2,603 'special allowance' for his role as chief whip.Former Labour councillor Noel Murphy said: "This is a lot of money for someone who has failed to attend so many meetings."The decent thing to do for any councillor who feels he can wield the axe to employees of the borough while attending so few meetings would be to return some of his expenses."Jason Ellar, whose father Colin Ellar is deputy council leader, became one of the UK's youngest councillors when he was elected in 2010 aged 18, and is currently in his third year at Oxford University.The role of chief whip is to ensure councillors attend meetings and vote in line with party policy.Mr Ellar has attended six of the eight council meetings at which he was expected in the last year.However, he has failed to appear at a single Isleworth and Brentford forum or licensing meeting during that period, sending his apologies on just two occasions.A spokeswoman for Hounslow Labour Group said: "Jason Ellar takes his responsibilities as chief whip and councillor very seriously."He keeps in constant contact with the administration and is involved at every level. He also returns from university on a regular basis to deal with issues in his ward."Opposition leader Peter Thompson admitted attendance at meetings was not the only measure of a good councillor but questioned how he could be expected to properly fulfil his role as chief whip."People in Jason Ellar's ward will decide for themselves if they think that he is pulling his weight when it comes to the local elections," he said."They might be very happy to have a councillor who is a full time student and who lives at university during term time."However, I do find it difficult to understand how he can be doing his role as chief whip of Hounslow Labour Group - for which he gets an additional allowance."Surely this role is all about having your fingers of the pulse of the party?"Mr Ellar is one of six councillors, out of a total of 60, to have attended fewer than three fifths of the meetings at which they were expected during the past year.The others all claimed to have been unwell or had clashes with work during that period. BEST ATTENDANCE (percentage)Lily Bath (Labour) 97Ruth Cadbury (Labour) 98Theo Dennison (Labour) 94Ajmer Dhillon (Labour) 95Sam Hearn (Conservative) 90Paul Jabbal (Conservative) 91Liz Mammatt (Conservative) 98Amritpal Mann (Labour) 100 WORST ATTENDANCE (percentage)* Alan Barber (Labour) 58* Rajinder Bath (Labour) 46* John Cooper (Labour) 57Jason Ellar (Labour) 38* Barbara Harris (Conservative) 45* Peta Vaught (Labour) 9 * Councillors Bath, Harris and Vaught all cited ill-health as the reason for their poor attendance rates. Councillor Harris lives in Nottinghamshire but said she tries to make it to as many meetings as possible and plans to step down ahead of the next elections. Councillor Cooper said it was sometimes difficult for him to attend as he works shifts at Heathrow. Councillor Barber said he had been heavily involved in the Olympics due to his work, which often made it hard for him to attend meetings. Figures based on the percentage of meetings attended by councillors, where they were expected, between September 25, 2011 and the same date this year, according to Hounslow Council's website.

Paul Fisher ● 4930d

Morning TheoI accept your point that in his first few months of being a councillor Jason did attend more meetings then I credited him for and I apologise both to him and to you for getting my facts wrong for that periodHowever his record over the last year is shocking and here are his attendence figures since 05/10/11 as published on the Hounslow Council websiteBorough Council, 29/11/2011 Present  Borough Council, 31/01/2012 Present  Borough Council, 28/02/2012 Present  Borough Council, 27/03/2012 Present  Isleworth and Brentford Area Forum, 17/11/2011 Apologies received  Isleworth and Brentford Area Forum, 26/01/2012 Absent  Isleworth and Brentford Area Forum, 15/03/2012 Absent  Licensing Committee, 25/01/2012 Absent  Borough Council, 15/05/2012 Expected  Borough Council, 19/06/2012 Expected  Borough Council, 17/07/2012 Expected  Borough Council, 18/09/2012 Expected  Isleworth and Brentford Area Forum, 24/05/2012 Absent  Isleworth and Brentford Area Forum, 19/07/2012 Apologies received  Isleworth and Brentford Area Forum, 13/09/2012 Absent  Licensing Committee, 10/05/2012 Absent  To me this looks as though he has simply given up on serving the residents who elected him especially the fact that he appears to have absolutely no interest in the local Area Forum where the most importent decisions regarding our local wards are made in my opinionPerhaps you or one of your colleagues could explain how he could possibly also be entitled to an extra £1100 a year to be the Labour Whip?To be fair it would not matter what party he represents as I would be equally critical of any councillor but it is also the fact that he is a local councillor and should not be claiming his full allowancesFor the record I abstained when the increase in allowances was voted on and but I did accept the increase when it was made

Paul Fisher ● 4943d

"I know I am the sole labour member to post on TW8 these days so maybe they are all fair game but personally I think it is so very wrong to malign him behind his back" Theo, anybody is free to contribute to these forums and it is indeed a shame that so few sitting Cllrs do so. The 'elder statesmen' of Chiswick regularly contribute and give back as good as they get and can be respected for that. It also makes for good open debate and shows some engagement with the community they were elected to serve.I personally know nothing of Jason Ellar other than what I have read on this forum but I feel free to comment on any 'facts & figures' as quoted by others. I sgree it is wrong to malign others behind their backs but I would challenge that anything said on this forum is behind anyones back. It is probably the most transparent communication vehicle we have at our disposal and any Councillor worth his or her salt would be reading these threads if only to guage the feelings of their communities. They are all free to challenge any comments made unless they 'couldn't be bothered'  or believe they are above lowering themselves to active community engagement!That being the case they shouldn't be too disappointed when the public couldn't be bothered to vote for them next time round. The public are very wary of those elected to office who are silent for 3 years and are suddenly all over the local press and forums in the run up to elections. Cue Sue Samson as a typical example. How is she doing on planet Zargon? Is she intending to return to earth before the elections?

Steve Taylor ● 4943d

I actually feel inclined to defend Jason Ellar.  Let us look at the facts.Syon was a ward which Labour didn't expect to win.  This is evidenced by the fact that the party's most logical choice of candidate - Corinna Smart, who lives in the ward, has represented it before and is one of the party's big hitters - got herself nominated in Hounslow Heath in preference to her own manor.Syon was one of the last wards to select candidates and Labour was running out of options.  I am reliably advised that Jason wasn't the only Syon Labour candidate who didn't really want to be a councillor.I think the election results took everybody by surprise.  We all knew the result would be affected by the fact that a general election was being held at the same time, but I don't think any of us realised how much.  Independents and minority party candidates the length and breadth of the country were slaughtered, and in London they were all but wiped out.  Good (non-ICG) independent councillors in Hounslow found themselves coming fourth in the wards they had previously represented.  Under the circumstances the ICG did extremely well to still poll second ahead of the Tories in two wards and to come within 78 votes of holding a seat.As far as I am aware Jason had always planned to go on to University.  He would have been a fool not to, he is a very bright and personable young man and will have no shortage of opportunities to pursue a political career once his studies are finished with if indeed that is what he feels inspired to do.  For the time being however he is stuck with a councillor's job that he never wanted and is that he is unable to perform.  Of course the decent thing for him to do now would be to quit his seat and force a by-election but I would imagine that his own party will be insisting he doesn't do that because of the possibility (some might say likelihood) that it will be lost.  As we know from many previous and current examples the major political parties would rather residents be "represented" by an absentee councillor from their own party than by a good, effective councillor from another.Jason then will be under pressure from his own party to stay put and hope that nobody notices he isn't around.  It says a lot about the expectations of his party and of others that they even think they could pull this off.In short, my case is that any condemnation or criticism should be of the party which put him up for election in the full knowledge that he would not be able to do the job, rather than of the lad himself.

Phil Andrews ● 4944d