Forum Topic

You know, I don't believe the local council actually own the roads.  The householders on either side of the road do, which is why they are allowed to dig a basement up to the centre line of any outside road.  As our elected and paid for (civil) servants we have given the council the the duty to keep them in good repair and sufficiently unobstructed to allow us to use them.  Hounslow council, like all councils, regularly gets a bit beyond itself with its own self importance.  The council is only there to run the schools, collect the rubbish, clean and repair the streets and make sure no one builds whopping great ugly buildings nearby.  Anything else they do is above and beyond what we, the public that pay their wages, have actually asked of them.  Being able to park close to your home should be a natural public right, and if this can only be enforced by restricted residents parking then the council should make sure it does not impose an unnecessary burden on the residents.  In other words it should only cost us a nominal fee to cover the cost of one person printing and posting the permits.  That registering a second car for a permit costs £100, ostensibly to discourage people having 2 car families, instead of less than the £65 for the first car just shows the council is trying to impose the ideas of a few onto the many.  Why do we even call them Councillors?  It's just a title they made up for themselves so I'd prefer it if we all called them civil servants, just to remind them they do not provide council, but do provide service.

Lorne Gifford ● 4578d

I know people can never get their heads around this, but at national government level downwards there is an increased emphasis away from encouraging private car use and towards public transport, car clubs etc.Personally speaking I'd hate to be without a car permanently, but there's no doubt I could adjust to it.  In my view the biggest cause of congestion is schools, far more than business commuters.  More and more I find both other people and myself are adjusting to alternatives to using the car, I visit all parts of London all of the time and it is exceptionally rare for me to use my car to do so because (1) generally it's slower than by public transport, and (2) there's all the hassle and cost of parking.  So I don't share this assumption that the majority of visitors travel to a London destination by car.If kids are going to scouts or to evening classes, there's buses or they can walk with friends or family.  Doing the weekly food shop doesn't stand up in this day and age, it's no bother to pick up bits every day when passing shops, and more and more people use home deliveries (indeed it amazes me how popular such services are).  The bottom line is that 90% of Londoners could adjust to not having a car in the household.Don't get me wrong, I'm not pro CPZ, and whilst I own a car I'd never buy a house or flat which didn't have off street parking because I wouldn't want to have to pay a permit and still have no certainty of being able to park outside my abode.  Your comments about developers really are far fetched however, otherwise I'd be typing this from my private yacht in Monaco harbour !.

Adam Beamish ● 4578d

It is obvious that this is part of a concerted and cynical move by our so called representatives to impose a cash cow CPZ on this community. Consider this: The Watermans has recently announced that it will charge for parking.There is a new residential development being built next to the Watermans.Hamilton Road, Layton Road and (Brook Lane North) all CPZThe Tower a 32 storey partly residential building is under construction at Great West Quarter nearby.These developments plus others planned around the high street will (if the developers are to be believed) attract plenty of visitors.Q. Where will the overspill parking go - where will canny visiting motorists park? A. Anywhere where restrictions don't apply.Q. What will rightly aggrieved residents ultimately do when parking becomes impossible? A. Relent and beg for a CPZTo those that say householders have no right to a parking place near their home - I say, try bringing up the future generation of this country (ferrying kids to school, sporting and other clubs such as the Scouts, visiting far away relatives, doing the weekly family shop) without access to a car! It's a bit like saying live without the Internet, phone, tv, radio or other modern day conveniences that millions of people rely on in our 21st century society. Is the truth really that those nay sayers are simply against the traditional family unit?It is all a disgrace - it is enriching developers who couldn't care less about Brentford. They are sitting pretty in luxurious mansions with ample private parking, far far far away from our community. You can also be assured that the ruling members of the council are complicit in this and couldn't care less about the impact of all this over-development on our community and the inevitable stresses it will place on Brentford's limited infrastructure (schools, doctor's surgeries, railway, roads etc.). Why? because the outcomes suit their political agenda perfectly.

Rod de St Croix ● 4578d

You all have my sympathy folks.  The Lead Cllr in the LBH Cabinet for traffic and parking is 27yr old youngster Cllr Ed Mayne of Isleworth.  His parents live in a nobby road in leafy Grove Park, Chiswick, with a majority of homes having ample off street parking.  The whole of Grove Park one and a half years ago voted overwhelmingly (93%) against any CPZ.  In the face of this massive vote, all the 9 Chiswick councillors agreed NO CPZ in Grove Park.  However, they reckoned without the Machiavellian Ed.  Ed's parents and their neighbours don't like anyone else parking in THEIR road - this suited our Ed just fine.  He has ignored the local people,  overruled all the local councillors, and his buddies at Lampton Rd have backed him through 2 Scrutiny Committees and now two of the longest roads in Grove Park are to get a totally un-necessary and un-wanted CPZ.  This will cause a big over-flow of cars into smaller nearby roads, where many homes do not have off street parking.Eventually, the whole of Grove Park will become a giant CPZ which will please our Ed and more importantly the giant company who LBH are about to sign a contract with to manage and run all the parking within the Borough.  This private company do not like pockets of no CPZ - they want every street to have controlled parking to make it really profitable to send in the wardens and their PCNs!  The Labour controlled LBH care not one jot for local opinion or local democracy - they ignore it all.  They are not fit for purpose and meanwhile we groan under their tyranny.

Jennifer Selig ● 4581d