Forum Topic

I now see that the cycle lane markings join up a lot better than they did.A recent Mayor's Question Time item sought improvement in TfL's performance on this. Might we hope that the organisations that Hounslow use could also get their act together in a more timely fashion than ? five months ?"Cycle marking following road resurfacingQuestion No: 2013/4649Darren JohnsonA recent complaint from a constituent has revealed that, following resurfacing work by TfL, cycle markings can be delayed for days and maybe weeks, rather than hours for lane markings for vehicle drivers. As a matter of policy can you ensure TfL agree to the principle that reinstatement of road safety line markings that directly impact safety should not be unduly delayed following road repairs?Written response from the MayorTfL confirm that road markings are reinstated as a matter of course as soon as physically possible following carriageway surfacing.Of course when conditions are wet, the road markings fail to adhere to the new road surface, and in these situations stop lines and pedestrian crossing markings are temporarily reinstated until such time as the permanent markings can be applied.As part of the ongoing resurfacing programme, TfL is taking the opportunity to review road markings and layouts to ensure they are fit for current purpose. It may have been as a result of such a review that your constituent witnessed a period of delay in cycle markings being applied. TfL undertake in future to complete all such reviews before any resurfacing commences."

Tim Henderson ● 4410d

I think talking on brentfordtw8 is "talking to each other". I suspect engagement with Councillors or council officers is needed to influence action.On pedestrian crossings, I was searching for the original consultation document for the scheme on the Hounslow website - and failed. [Google found the original story on brentfordtw8 "Have your say on Twickenham Road Improvements"http://www.brentfordtw8.com/default.asp?section=info&page=consultation006.htmbut the link from that page to the hounslow pdf is dead]However the search did reveal a July 2013 document that talks about raised tables at the entrances to the roundabout providing informal crossing positions.http://www.hounslow.gov.uk/traffic_twickenham_road_traffic_calming_050713.pdf This seems a good idea - but the attached plan shows no central refuge. And given that I thought the previous trials had shown  the need for a big island (of cones) in the middle of the southern approach to stop two lanes forming and encroaching into the northbound cycle lane, I would have thought there is room for one.The plan does show a new Zebra crossing in South Street and the existing pelican crossing north of the roundabout  (?Vanessa's Gumley to St. Bridget's church) is retained.I was disappointed that the plan also seems to show an advisory rather than a solid-line mandatory cycle laneThe proposed junction tables will consist of flat top road humpsspanning the whole of the junctions. They will also provide a continuous level surface for pedestrians crossing the Twickenham Road, St John’s Road and South Streetat the informal crossings

Tim Henderson ● 4551d

Dear Ms Smith,I refer to your correspondence with Cllr Mayne on the above throughout June. I apologise for not writing sooner but I had observed some continued discussion between Cllr Mayne and yourself. I registered the matter with our Customer Services team in the interim and have now had opportunity to look into the matter formally. The mini-roundabout junction is currently being trialled to see if this junction layout would reduce congestion in the area as well as free up carriageway space for footway widening and wider cycle lanes. The traffic modelling indicates that it will, but as this is the first traffic signal removal in the Borough we wanted to run a trial before making the final decision. Because it is a trial we have made only temporary changes to the layout, such as blackening out of the lines rather than complete removal; minimising what would have to be un-done should the trial prove unsuccessful. If the trial is successful then substantial works will take place over the school summer holiday period to change the junction layout, including widening of the footway and resurfacing of the carriageway. We are monitoring the situation and have like you noticed that drivers are still trying to form two lanes on both Twickenham Road approaches. As with any change in road layout it takes a couple of weeks for drivers to get used to it, although in this case it would seem that drivers are determined to continue using the road as before, without paying attention to the road markings. To try and address this we have made the cycle lane markings solid and slightly thicker and added more cycle logos, since making these changes there has been a marginal improvement in lane discipline, but still not as much as we would have liked. We will continue to monitor the junction and see what more we can do in the short term to address this. Should the permanent scheme go ahead then the footway will be widened and the remaining carriageway width will make it clear that this is no longer to be used as two lanes. We will be formulating our conclusions on the success or otherwise of the trial during the middle part of July. I appreciate that as this initiative affects you there may be some frustration about its impact. Various adverse references have been made about engineering staff throughout correspondence. The email dated 3 June 2013 was brought to my attention by officers. During consultation and trials of this nature the engineers are often caught between support and opposition to such schemes. In trying to meet expectations they may not please all. Clearly at this time you are not happy with the scheme but I would kindly ask that your comments are made in a manner that officers feel they can engage comfortably with you. Please let me know if you have any further concern so I am able ensure they are addressed as part of the ongoing consultation. Regards Steve 

Vanessa Smith ● 4584d

Hi all, I've copied below the response received from the Council's traffic team. Unfortunately, this doesn't actually address the concerns I raised, but it seems to imply that they won't be adding any extra signs.*******The new junction layout results from independent appraisal of computer traffic modelling that indicate removal of the traffic signals and introduction of a mini-roundabout would reduce congestion through the area. An exhibition and consultation of the proposals was undertaken in November 2012. The mini-roundabout is designed to release carriageway space to allow footway widening and wider cycle lanes on both sides of the carriageway. The new zebra crossing provided in South Street should result in lower delays to traffic flow whilst still providing the safety benefits to pedestrians of a controlled crossing. The new junction layout is a temporary installation to determine whether results from traffic modelling reduce traffic queue as predicted. An independent assessment on traffic movements will be carried out shortly, if the mini-roundabout is deemed to be successful, a permanent mini-roundabout will be established. If however, results of the assessment indicate the junction is not working as forecast, the mini-roundabout will be removed and the traffic signals reinstated. As this is a temporary feature, existing road markings have been ‘blacked out’ for the trial period and new road layout signs have been installed on all approaches to the junction.*****

Sara Foster ● 4607d

Chris as you will know from our correspondence some of the 'improvements' that your colleague thinks are better for cyclists do not work in the interests of motorists, and I agree trying to marry both up is difficult, but it would be nice for some consideration to be given to people who pay a hell of a lot of money for the privilege of driving on said roads. However, I am bound to say - as far as the median strip junction Dawes Ave/Twickenham Rd. that Chris decided in his wisdom to shorten, after a long campaign some years ago to get it made longer, as far as I can see has not been too successful. I have had at least three motorists chancing the illegal right hand turn into Dawes Ave. by swivelling around the strip and coming face to face with unsuspecting people in Dawes Ave. All that to save sitting in traffic in Twickenham Rd. You may be right that this roundabout system works better in time, but that doesn't get away from the fact there is precious little signage a) To warn of the new road layout, and b) to warn about the roundabout installation, and I didn't see any warning people of works starting either. All anyone knew was that the lights were out. Did your colleague consult the schools as they will be the most affected by this especially St. Marys? And the volume of traffic that  they create especially in the morning, also there are The Blue School and Gumley all in that one small area. All for cyclists? What happened to safer routes to schools and children's safety?

Vanessa Smith ● 4628d