Forum Topic

Had a very good meeting with two lovely, and very sensible officers from HH. If only we'd done this in the first place! What they call 'fly-tipping' is different from our interpretation, and basically is occasional junk which if seen we, or our neighbour who uses the access frequently, will dispose of ourselves. Several people do have stuff that is put aside which HH would like moved and I personally would write to the people concerned and tell them it should be moved/cleared as it is a potential hazard if someone who shouldn't be down here decided to set light to it - understandable. This is the sort of thing that has been causing concern apparently. It also seems that the original report that went to this Central Area Housing Forum in March was incorrect which they did realise and apologise for, has now been re-presented and makes sense, we are now having a consultation about the gate as previously it was confined to a couple of HH tenants. This will take into account all users in the three roads the road services. I did make the point that the real fly-tip area was outside the Furniture Project, that is frequently blighted with mattresses, beds, sundry furniture even a bath with all the fittings recently! To be fair when I report it - it is cleared very quickly but I don't think there's any doubt that the imposition of quite high charges to clear stuff, and the fact that vans etc. are charged at the tip contributes to this increase in real problems with dumping. A false economy if ever there was one, and one perhaps that councillors might take a look at. Surely making charges for a clearance service far more reasonable so that people will use it is far, far cheaper than constantly having to clear stuff dumped all over the borough? And also some prosecutions for those that get caught - because there simply is no excuse for doing it. We all pay in the end. Anyway I am most grateful to both these officers for their time - we all agreed that in the end it's all about good communication.

Vanessa Smith ● 4528d

MEMBERSHIP 2.1          Each Forum shall comprise up to 21 Members excluding co-optees except where insufficient nominations are received to fill the available places. 2.2          Each Forum shall comprise: 10 tenants nominated by the Hounslow Federation of Tenants and Residents Association (HFTRA).  Up to 2 of these may be non-Hounslow Homes tenants, but elected through HFTRA electoral process from Tenants Residents Associations where more than 50% of tenants are Hounslow Homes’ tenants.  The maximum number of nominees from any one housing estate shall be restricted to one, unless other nominees are not available, in which case the maximum number from one estate shall be two. 3 Leaseholders of Hounslow Homes, 2 nominated by HFTRA.  1 nominated by the Leaseholder Forum. Up to 5 Councillors nominated by the Council’s Area Committees, as link Councillors between the Area Committee and the Forum.           3 Board Members, nominated by the Board of Hounslow Homes. Up to 3 co-opted Members representing traditionally under-represented groups in the area subject to approval of each Forum. 2.3          All appointments and nominations shall have due regard to the Hounslow Homes Equal Opportunities policy and ensure that each Forum reflects the community it seeks to serve. 2.4          Members who miss more than 3 meetings without reasonable explanations to the Chair may have their membership terminated by the Chair.  The Chair will then invite the nominating body to make a new nomination. 2.5          Where in the view of the Chair a Member is guilty of serious misconduct or impropriety, the Chair may terminate their membership and invite the nominating body to make a new nomination.

Sarah Felstead ● 4538d