Forum Topic

Well it seems that there is a seachange coming.The Mayor's office has objected to the fact that the Brentford FC development is more of the same. Tiny overpriced flats in too dense and too high a development and contains almost zero affordable or social housing.It's a tough one especially when it's the club 3 generations have supported, but I would have hoped the community club would have had space for almshouses, and not to jump on the same bandwagon that Michael has highlighted.I can't support the BFC plans as it is more of the same and agree with Michael that more needs to be done to change what is going on.He is absolutely right, if out of reach meagre accommodation passed off as 'exclusive' keeps getting approved, we are going to have a huge chunk of society 'excluded' and he's right, it's no longer the unfortunate but now creeping into the fortunate who are getting squeezed out.It's likely that no matter how well our children do, they will never be able to live in even a modest place in this district.It's not right that all that gets approved and built is premium and exclusive.It's all marketing hype and it has been aided by the industry which thrives on percentage commission. The more hype the more profit.But it's at the expense of the local community and that will become a bigger problem as the next generation are forced away.Has the GLA finally realised this?  Will the London Boroughs stand up and unite to end this debacle and insist on affordable developments or non at all?In Ireland, authorities are threatening to confisgate land that is being held by speculator/developers who fail to build or do not include affordable housing in their plans. They are getting fed up with wide boy spiv developers who fail to deliver, cut and run and liquidate only to resurface in another form, a bit like Dr. Who.

Raymond Havelock ● 4384d

Thanks for the input Cllr Cadbury.It is true that things are being made harder, which is why local authorities, irrespective of party control should be getting together and pushing for changes before it is too late.The conditions for an application do need to be a lot tougher so applicants know that they are not going to get away with fobbing us off with a high profit low cost development that does not really deliver.That they provide parking that does not cost the occupant a fortune, that they do not cause a strain on services like sewerage, water supplies, gas and electricity which is starting to show the signs of strain .It's a worrying problem for not just the low paid but even the well paid.They are now in the same boat and a lot of these are natural tory voters, so the problem is no longer a political issue it is a pan-social issue.The shared ownership deals are really flawed.  If one does the maths while it appears very cheap to a first time buyer, it works out very costly. Far more than with a mortgage for the actual value of a property.Housing associations don't seem to be working as well as they ought either.Social housing is and will remain a need but the big void is the bit in the middle.A heck of a lot of residential building is going on. But it is almost entirely unaffordable to anyone on a reasonable income.How can anyone afford £280,000 for a very small one bed flat in an average area bordering an industrial estate?The fact that so much of these developments are pre build marketed in China, Singapore and Abu-Dhabi is for me the biggest problem. Several in this town were pre sold this way and at huge discounts to the UK sale price.I feel that this may be to raise building funds but it is totally wrong and needs to be addressed with the utmost urgency otherwise Social Housing and Housing associations are going to have a tsunami of applicants in need.It needs to be an all party united approach to both Boris and the Government to legislate and if necessary change the planning rules and ownership laws.It would of course cause a dip in prices but they are being pushed artificially high by the games being played by developers and marketeers.

Michael Brandt ● 4385d

"councils do have a raft of seldom used tools which can limit all this.And they can attach a lot more strings to the proviso of appllcations."Michael - I welcome you suggestions on these, and assume you mean any that are valid and legal now in 2013. However, my experience is that our powers are getting more limited.  Council Planning Committees have to implement regional and national planning policies, and whilst Hounslow would dearly love to have the funding for, and be able to approve, 10,00 new (truly) affordable homes - sadly neither the Government nor Boris make the funds or powers available to us.  And as you know, a planning refusal by our Planning Committee runs the risk of the applicant getting permission on appeal, and then we lose our say on the conditions imposed.We will achieve our target of 2500 new affordable hones during the current administration (2012-2014) of which over 300 are Council-owned homes, and the rest owned or managed by Housing Associations.  However, there are over 10.000 households in this borough in housing need right now, and this number is growing.  Most cannot afford to buy, even into the shared ownership option that forms part of the affordable housing numbers.Of course one way to address the issue would be for the Government to release funding to build new social rented housing, at rents level with Council rents, for those on low-incomes and in housing need.  And in time there would be a saving to the tax-payer on the massive cost of housing benefit, currently being paid to private landlords, on behalf of households earning low pay, or on full disability or pensions benefit, and unable to get Council housing and whose income is little more than the rent.

Cllr Ruth Cadbury ● 4385d

One of the people I most admire is Mary Robinson, the former president of Ireland, and a constitutional lawyer, who summed it up years ago. Our political leaders in Hounslow, and indeed the Country should take a page from her book. People are sick and tired of mainstream politics, the in-fighting, and taking every opportunity to score political points and line their pockets in the process. The people want moral leadership, something Mary Robinson has spoken about time and again.She has  stressed the need to be humble and listen. "Don't go into a place thinking you know the answer."  Moral leadership she said has to be sensed from within, from your own values and vision, your moral compass if you will.  It was about listening and nurturing not the hierarchical leadership structure that has been the norm."From her experience as a former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, she noted two articles from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article one states: "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood." "Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.""We need a new kind of leadership, moral leadership, whose attributes really are embodied in  leaders, who listen, nurture and empathize." Sadly Labour and the Conservatives in Hounslow just don't get it and will no doubt  be most perplexed and confused when people demonstrate their frustration and disgust with mainstream politics at the polls.

Steve Taylor ● 4387d