Forum Topic

In answer to your questions.I would not have posted it this was not fact.If you google FoI for housing associations, you will find Grant Shapps 2011 proposals.That does not mean he is a knight in shining armour, he has as most politicians do at some time in power all the right things but achieved very very little. His successor can't even manage that and needs a good prod.Hounslow MPs are well aware of the goings on at A2 Dominon but are rather inneffective at dealing with the problems.Currently, Housing Associations are immune from Freedom of Information requests and are becoming very secretive in their dealings, much of which is taxpayers funding. The excesses by the executive of one organisation is akin to the excesses of BBC executives which are available ( just ) for public scrutiny.Taking a closer look as several of my extended family are in accomodation now in the portfolios of A2 Dominion and Notting Hill and have been having many difficulties with anti social neighbours placed via local authorities and disrupting the lives of other residents. Both LBH, LBE and the associations just will not fulfill their duty of care to long term tenants and simply evade the issues. Tenants get a wall of silence or get leaned on to not complain.It has seriously damaged the well being of a close aunt in the family so my wife has been trying to help on her behalf.  We have since seen lawyers, care workers and so on. We have had not a single reply from any councillors or the constituency MP apart from an acknowledgement. So we have dug deeper.The same names keep coming up, and yes we have a fair bit of evidence but it will be presented to the media or the approriate officials first.What is needed is FOI access to get to the bottom of what is going on as a great many people who pay their modest way are getting kicked around like footballs while organisations being funded and benefitting from local authority preferences and taxpayers money are failing them.And it is a lot worse than I have written on this forum.So I am asking for as many to lobby MPs and the Housing minister to represent Grant Shapps 2011 proposals.

Anthony Waller ● 4408d

I could tell you quite a bit about how government procurement works - similar rules apply to local and central government.I haven't seen G4S in action but I have certainly seen Serco and Capita. Government procurement starts with long-listing where suppliers have to demonstrate their capacity to do the job. In the past I worked for a smaller (but by no means small, with 2-3000 UK employees and >10,000 in Europe) supplier and very often we simply could not demonstrate the scale to be considered for larger contracts. I know local authorities who despaired of Capita but could not find anyone else to bid who would pass muster so it often ended up with Capita v Serco v someone big trying to break into the market but who didn't really understand it (EG BT). In the end they stay with the devil they know on the basis that it's much harder to fire someone who cocks up by going with the market leader. At central government I think slightly different factors apply. Ministers (of whatever party) are often full of their own importance and would rather be taking a gin and tonic with the managing partner of KPMG or Goldman Sachs or, indeed, G4S (who only 2 years ago were bidding to be the biggest facilities management company in the world) than some workaday supplier who provides decent service and value for money. The other thing of course is ministers and civil servants thinking about their future careers - the Geoff Hoons of this world running their 'cabs for hire', Chris Huhne now working for an energy consultancy  and Dave Hartnett (formerly head of HMRC, now a tax adviser at Deloittes) - would prefer to keep in with those to which £250k pa is 'chicken feed' (to quote our Mayor commenting on his  own job which he does in his spare time from messing up London!).It goes against the grain a bit but I must commend the current government who are actually making what seems to be a genuine attempt to spread spend to smaller suppliers, at least in IT.Oh, and whilst I'm at it, well done John Todd for not point-scoring about Isleworth Public Hall: some tories have principles!

Guy Lambert ● 4408d

"The whole social housing industry has become a shameless and rich pickings for the same old faces. Dodgy counclllors, developers and the type of people who buy care home businesses."Any evidence?"Grant Shapps in 2011 proposed that Housing Associations should be subject to FoI access. Then he got moved and his successor is a hopeless junior minister with about as much clout as a feather duster."Grant Shapps has an 'equivocal' position on FoI ( see: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-chairman-grant-shapps-told-aides-to-suppress-emails-that-showed-he-misled-mps-8650263.html) The governments new useless web site gov.uk can of course throw no light on what happened to Shapps's good suggestion. Perhaps Anthony can, as he seems so knowledgeable?"Organisations like A2 Dominion and Notting Hill are increasingly awful landlords - almost as bad as the landlords that Housing Associations were created to counter and replace."Any evidence?"Questions have to be asked about the dealings between A2 Dominon and Hounslow Council. The cosy relationship between Cllr Curran and co. with such organisations and how A2 Dominion and United house get plum council contracts with such a poor record as landlords and their duty of care obligations."What questions should be asked? Have you asked them? Have you made FoI requests of your own? Any answers? "Well worth lobby MPs and the housing minister to push through the freedom of information access ."I agree"Open this gravy train can of worms and get it reformed."Any evidence that this is a 'gravy train can of worms"?"Something Labour of all parties seem terrified of."Any evidence?"Why? One wonders, might that be?"I haven't a clue if it is so. You obviously believe it to be the case and you obviously have a theory as to why. Perhaps you can share your theory?

Guy Lambert ● 4408d

There is real concern amongst landlords of those on benefits, whether they are private or social landlords.At least 3 changes make it likely that rents will not get paid:1 Claimants will get less, often quite a lot less.2 They will be paid monthly and have to budget a whole month3 There is no longer a facility for rents to be paid direct from the benefit systemNot all benefit recipients are lazy scroungers who keep the blinds drawn. Come to think of it, very few are. Far more are 'vulnerable' to use the approved term  - physically or mentally handicapped, suffering from mental illness, single parents with part time work etc.Even if you accept that benefits should be reduced (I don't) why on earth do you introduce these other changes at the same time. Someone who used to post on this forum gave various chapters of the story of her mentally handicapped stepsister (I think) who had never been capable of holding a job - not through choice, but because she didn't have the mental capacity - who was suddenly assessed by ATOS as being capable for work. At this stage she was in her late 50s and had never worked in her life. She had kept out of institutional care (which would have cost a lot more) by living off invalidity etc benefits. Her level of mental capacity was such that, if she went into a shop, she just handed over her purse and asked them to take the right amount.She was personally very friendly and vulnerable to anybody who took an interest for good or nefarious reasons. Of course the assessment was overturned on appeal, but what hope is there for her to survive in this brave new world?By the way, Hounslow Council are preparing for the change by working with your friendly neighbourhood Credit Union (plug alert) www.thamesbank.org (of which I am hon. treasurer) to provide 'jam jar' and credit union current accounts to help people survive this pernicious change.

Guy Lambert ● 4410d