Ed, as the person who kicked this off, I thank you for your detailed response. An occasional and fairly recent rather than frequent visitor, I have always thought that KBSM was a terrific museum, well-run, friendly. A pound or two on the pricy side for a suburban museum, but the 12 month ticket policy was most enlightened and one that other London museums and galleries would do well to follow. So a lot of positive things to work with. Problems include: not easy to get to. Lottery funding cannot solve this, you just have to take that on the chin. Poor marketing. A clunky old web site, but you don't need lottery funding to fix that, and it has been fixed. Tick. And you have no doubt done myriad other good things which I look forward to seeing. But the name thing. Charlatans and fools think that marketing is all about branding and positioning. Even if that were true, branding and positioning are not easy to get right. The first resort of the marketing scoundrel is changing the name. The second is justifying it by claiming to have consulted widely.The London Museum of Water and Steam may have the word "London" in it, but it hardly trips off the tongue let alone sticks in the mind. Your best hope is that search engines find you when folks are searching for the venerable KBSM. If Madame Tussauds were having difficulties, would they change their name to the London Waxworks? I think not. Ditching KBSM is a pity, a shame, a mistake and - worst of all - cannot be reversed. Or can it?
Mike Paterson ● 4329d