Forum Topic

"front doors and back doors and car doors are all left unlocked"I don't want to diminish the good memories of individuals or of the neighbourhoods in which they grew up in but crime really isn’t a recently discovered phenomenon. Crime has been around since man first realised that he could take advantage of another man. Yes, front and backdoors were left open in many neighbourhoods up and down the land. Then again this was probably in an era when a great many of our predecessors spent more time at home, raising their families and creating a home. Men formed the majority within the workforce and when opportunities for women in the workforce were much lower than they are today. When men were the predominate breadwinners and the aspirations of many women were just that, aspirations. A time when communities were stronger than they are today, when everyone knew everyone else, if not by name, by sight. A time when if you passed someone in the street you stopped and exchanged a “good morning” or a “good afternoon”. People felt that everyone looked out for everyone else. Neighbours borrowed a cup of sugar or an egg from each other, the man from the Pru called. Personal mobility was lower then too, far fewer cars were on the roads and of those who did have a car, they generally didn’t drive too far from their homes. Strangers in the neighbourhood would have stood out like the proverbial sore thumb. That was then and this is now. Our communities have changed as we and our world has developed. Today so many of us don’t even know what our neighbours look like, yet alone know their names. Many of us leave home early in the morning, arriving home later in the evening than many of our predecessors would have. The workforce is more balanced today, it’s not perfect and the glass ceiling does exist but many women play a much different role in the workforce of today than they would have years ago. More children are in after school care or are looked after by Childminders. Today we tend to travel further to get to work, not many of today’s jobs are down the lane at the local factory, pit or shipyard. Gone are the days of the ‘meer cat’ mentality when any unusual activity in the street brought everyone out, only to be replaced by Banham window grilles, Chubb locks and ADT intruder alarms.

Gareth Evans ● 7410d

Jim I don’t believe that crime levels are down. Neither do I feel that the fear of crime or the general perception of crime among the general public is down. The recording of criminal activity accurately and reliably is vital in targeting police resources to reduce crime and create safer communities. Many lower level crimes, which a couple of years ago would have been reported and which would have shown up in policing statistics, are no longer taken into account so here we have an immediate problem in compiling meaningful statistics. The police and the government will claim that crime levels are down, the police do this because their political masters, the government, demand this of them. The government want to claim that crime levels are down to show the general public that the government are in touch with the issues and are providing resources to reduce crime. However, if crime levels were genuinely down the government wouldn't be allocating millions of pounds putting in the Safer Neighbourhood Schemes would they? Yes, under this government there are more officers and administrative staff working within the police forces across the country. Then again, the government wouldn’t have increased the number of officers and administrative staff unless there was a genuine need to reduce crime, or would they?  So has the level of crime been reduced? I’d say not.Granted that officially the statistics on crime are down, they are down only through successive governments chopping and changing policing targets to suit the government of the day. But can we, and more to the point, should we trust the statistics from the police or government? The Audit Commission, a government organisation, announced in December 2004 that 6 out of 10 police forces fail to record crime to agreed national standards and that only 17 of the 43 forces in England and Wales had successfully implemented the National Crime Recording Standard (NCRS). The Audit Commission found that crime recording by Britain's largest force - the Metropolitan Police - had actually deteriorated. It stands to reason that if 60% of police forces are failing to record crime levels to an agreed standard and that in some forces crime reporting had deteriorated, neither the police nor the government can claim that crime levels are officially up, down or stable. Until such time as police and/or government statistics are credible all we can do is to hope that crime levels are reducing rather than being assured. 

Gareth Evans ● 7411d