Forum Topic

Wow, something over which I agree with you David.As to zero hours, I'm not sure they should be completely banned but certainly 'exclusive' ones should be and IMO they should be allowed only for the well paid - say more than £20 per hour, and/or where the employees have expressed a preference to work that way. This would leave room for freelancers or people who genuinely want to work in an unstructured way.As to the alleged use by MPs, it seems this might have been misreported. Here's a comment from Meg Hillier MP:"Meg Hillier • 4 days agoI wouldn't read too much into this. I have no zero hours contracts but have to creat a contract for every casual member of staff. Have discover IPSA was still counting someone who only worked 2 weeks full time nearly a year ago covering a vacancy between appointments. So IPSA does not record zero hours. This should have been made clearer in the FoI response"Actually it looks to me to be pretty clear in the FOI response. Here is the relevant bit:"In responding to your request, we have interpreted your request for the number of MPs’ staff on zero-hour contracts as the number of MP’s staff who are contracted on an hourly rate rather than a salary. According to our records, as of 8 May 2014, there were 151 individuals active on IPSA’s payroll contracted on an hourly rate. This may include any short-term staff taken on – for example, to provide paternity, maternity or sickness cover"Full text is hereparliamentarystandards.org.uk/transparency/FOI/2014-15%20Freedom%20of%20information%20requests%20and%20responses/wF1415-014.pdfI'd say sloppy/tendentious reporting by the Daily Mail and the Daily Mirror. Gosh, who'd have thought it?

Guy Lambert ● 4277d

Couldn't agree more, I'd like to see zero hours contracts outlawed altogether. Sod big business and their bleating about how it helps to have a more flexible workforce. Try telling Tesco or the utility suppliers they'll need to be more 'flexible' over people being able to pay their bills. It is indeed outrageous and takes the p*ss big time. People are entitled to know what hours they will work and how much they will be paid. Similarly I'd like to see people who are personal carers paid for the time they are at work which includes travelling between clients. MPs have again gone off on holiday, they are full of telling us how we've all got to work harder and how people take advantage and they're probably the laziest and biggest spongers around!I quote: "MPs like to moan that they are overworked and underpaid and undervalued, yet the truth is more complex. For all their complaints they are among the top 3% of earners in this country, even without those controversial expenses and gold-plated pensions. Some are extremely smart, but others would struggle to earn similar packages in the private sector." Last year the House of Commons sat for 145 days, yes they do have constituency duties, and have been accused of possibly "creating a 'democratic vacuum' by giving the impression they were lazy, rarely working and poor value for money." "Perhaps our Westminster politicians should ponder these points as they sit on their sun loungers this week, wondering why they are so unpopular while absurd fringe parties are on the rise."

Vanessa Smith ● 4277d

Labour’s shadow ministers, including Stephen Timms (Employment) and Anne McGuire (Disabled People) seem to be in cahoots with right-wing thinktank Reform, according to information that has come to Vox Political.The fact that members of the UK’s left-wing political party are working with such an organisation is frightening enough, but you should be prepared for that fear to turn into terror when we reveal that Reform is part-funded by the criminal American insurance giant Unum.That’s right – Unum. The mob who have been influencing British policy on social security from behind the scenes since Peter Lilley invited them in, back in the 1990s. The mob who have been working to turn this country away from what was an excellent nationalised social security system and towards poorly-regulated private health insurance, in order to sell duff policies which offer very little likelihood of ever paying out.What could possibly have possessed anyone involved with Labour to have anything to do with these corporate pirates?“Unlike political parties, Reform and other think tanks can accept foreign funds… As a result, a number of foreign companies are now ‘Partners In Reform’ where an annual donation, which now stands at [just] £8,000, allows these companies [UNUM etc] to find representation in Britain’s policy hubs,” an OpenDemocracy report states.“Reform uses the ‘charitable’ money donated to convene private policy conferences on Health, Education, Social Care, Criminal Justice and Policing, Armed Forces, Welfare and Public Reforms. Through this, the corporate-funded body appears to have gained a high degree of influence over a number of important debates that are central to Britain.”One such conference was ‘A team effort: the role of employers in closing the protection gap’. Sponsored by Unum, the event on June 17 this year had, as one of its keynote speakers, Stephen Timms.He shared the platform with Conservative Employment Minister Mark Hoban – yes, the very same Mark Hoban who can’t get his facts right on matters of law that his own policies have created - and Peter O’Donnell, chief executive of Unum UK.It seems the event was advertised as Tory and Labour MPs acting in a team effort with an American insurance company, regarding “reform of the welfare state”.Now, it seems Reform is planning to influence all three main political parties at their annual conferences.Its event, ‘New thinking on the welfare state’, will be staged at the Labour conference by Anne McGuire. Attendance will be by invitation only – behind closed doors. And it is sponsored by the Association of British Insurers, which includes Unum among its members.At the Liberal Democrat conference it will be staged by Steve Webb MP, and at the Conservative conference by the unelected Lord Freud.

Ian Speed ● 4281d