Forum Topics

Heathrow and the Keens

Ok first of all let me state that on this occasion at least ;-)I am not attempting to make any political capital out of my following question and I am sure somebody with far more intelligence then myself could provide the answer? My question is as follows, I believe it is still unclear if the final Heathrow decision will eventually be decided by a Parliamentary vote or delegated powers but could or would it not be possible now we have been assured that the Keens are both against expansion for them to table an Early Day Motion in Parliament? Even if the decision is made under delegated powers,by one of them publicising an Early Day Motion they would both be demonstrating their opposition and also it will add a vehicle for likeminded MP`s to show their support also as follows. "Early day motions (EDMs) are formal motions submitted for debate in the House of Commons. However, very few EDMs are actually debated. Instead, they are used for reasons such as publicising the views of individual MPs, drawing attention to specific events or campaigns, and demonstrating the extent of parliamentary support for a particular cause or point of view.An MP can add their signature to an EDM to show their support. They can also submit amendments to an existing EDM. Although the majority of EDMs are never debated, the group of EDMs known as 'prayers' may be debated. Prayers are motions to overturn Statutory Instruments (laws made by Ministers under powers deriving from Acts of Parliament). Further information on EDM procedure can be found in the Commons Information Office Factsheet "Surely we should be exploring all avenues and perhaps this could be another weapon against the proposals?

Paul Fisher ● 6857d28 Comments ● 6503d