Forum Topics

Why will Hounslow Labour Group not stand by their colleague?

On another thread an individual poster, presuming to speak on behalf of the Hounslow Labour Group, made a nasty personal attack on Councillor Theo Dennison - elected ward member for Syon, Chair of the Planning Committee and until recently a member of the Cabinet.Amongst other things, he offered what purported to be an informed explanation for Councillor Dennison's demotion from the Cabinet.The individual concerned is not a member of the Hounslow Labour Group, not a councillor, not a resident of Hounslow and, depending upon whom one believes, maybe not even a member of the Labour Party.I asked at the time whether any member of the Hounslow Labour Group wished to disassociate themselves, and the Group, from the remarks.  Theo, as is his very honourable but irritating wont, responded in haste to defend his colleagues and to mitigate their lack of support for him by protesting that they never post on this forum (is this attributable to a medical condition?).Within minutes he was further undermined by a member of the Hounslow Labour Group, in fact a Cabinet member, who did indeed post on the forum, not to defend her colleague but to heap compliments upon the man who had abused him.  No disassociation by the Hounslow Labour Group was made from the comments posted by the non-councillor, non-resident and possible non-member.As a local resident and as a constituent of Councillor Dennison I would like to know whether my ward councillor is going to receive the support of his colleagues on this matter.  Or, if not, I would appreciate an explanation as to what power this non-resident wields over the local party which renders them unwilling to challenge a personal attack by him upon one of their own colleagues.

Phil Andrews ● 5146d20 Comments ● 5140d

Richmond Council to hold Referendum on Heathrow Expansion

Conservative-run Richmond Council is holding a referendum on the expansion of Heathrow Airport. It will be held before May next year and other west London councils will be encouraged to take part.The Council Leader, Councillor Nicholas True, said:“Richmond Council has again taken a united stance on an issue where people rightly expect us to put aside party bickering in local politics. We are all elected to fight for our residents - and there is no issue more important to them than this."I deeply regret that the nightmare vision of Heathrow expansion that had been so wisely laid to rest by our Coalition government has been resurrected. This time we must kill it off for good. As far as this Council is concerned it will be all-out war with the big money interests and slick-suited PR men peddling this foolish project. It is perfectly possible to deliver increased airport capacity in south-east England without expanding Heathrow. No-one in their right minds would consider building a new airport on the Heathrow site today - that must surely go for a new runway, too."Frankly, Richmond and other west London residents have had enough. They have patiently borne the scourge of Heathrow, with all the noise, pollution and risks, for decades. In 2010 they were given hope of permanent relief from expansion - they trusted the word of those who gave that promise and it should not be broken. "As their elected representatives we are not prepared to sit meekly and take incoming fire from the Heathrow lobby without giving our residents the chance to hit back and have their say. The proposed ballot will give the long-suffering people of west London an unprecedented opportunity to shout loud and clear to those that run the airport, and anyone inside government who may support them, that Londoners simply won’t take it. I hope that other boroughs will join us.”The Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, added: “I warmly welcome the news of this ballot in Richmond. It is a positive step that people living in the vicinity of Heathrow and who would feel the impact of any expansion most acutely, are given an opportunity to have their opinions clearly heard. Londoners elected me on a platform of opposition to expansion at Heathrow and it is a mandate I am absolutely determined to defend. A third runway would mean more traffic, more noise, more pollution and a serious erosion in the quality of life for hundreds of thousands of people. We need to rule out this option once and for all and quickly take forward a bolder, longer term solution capable of supporting the needs of the capital, namely a new hub airport ideally to the east of London."Will Hounslow Council follow Richmond's example ?

David Giles ● 5144d16 Comments ● 5140d