Forum Topics

Poor reporting on front page article re. Kew Bridge development

To quote the front page article about the Kew Bridge site :-----------But this time the Council officers got into serious discussions with the architects behind closed doors. The result was some modifications to the appearance of the building. Now they are again recommending approval.But it still remains too big. Those who had argued against the first scheme at the inquiry wrote to the Council this summer to say so.We will see whether their voice is heard on September 16th. The meeting is open to the public to attend so we can all see firsthand. Perhaps the committee will feel that any scheme is better than none, or perhaps they will feel that this really is a unique site on the edge of the river, which needs a really outstanding solution, even if we have to wait for it.If so the eco warriors may have the site to themselves for some time yet. -------------- Maybe it's just me but I object to a supposedly 'neutral' website making something akin to a statement of fact - "But it still remains too big" when this is simply a subjective viewpoint.  I've never read any part of the website suggesting that Modgen isn't really that smelly, or that the stench is definitely overpowering, because the author has no factual basis for saying so, so why make a definitive statement that a proposed development is 'too big'.I have absolutely no professional links to the Kew Bridge development, I should add.  I simply don't think it's a fair and balanced article, it makes assertions based upon the individual's opinion, if would be entirely different if the article was simply reporting what Brentford Community Council or IBAC/SDC had formally said about their views of the proposal.

Adam Beamish ● 6269d2 Comments ● 6268d

New Labour - has the grass-roots finally had enough?

I had an interesting conversation over a pint on Thursday with somebody who has been active in the local Labour Party for some time.Nothing particularly spectacular or out of the ordinary about that, but what was out of the ordinary was that he asked me a question. The reason that was out of the ordinary was that it was the third time that particular question - unthinkable from anybody involved with the Labour Party until very recently - had been asked of me by a party member in recent weeks. And all three were from different wards, making the prospect of collusion a bit less likely.I won't divulge what the question was, far less the answer that I gave, but what it suggested to me was that some sections of the party are beginning to think outside the box in a quite radical way. I have always believed that there are some good people involved with the Labour Party in this borough whose creativity, independence of thought and genuine concern for the welfare of the community has been stifled for so many years. It was inevitable that, one day, a straw would break the proverbial camel's back and all that goodwill would come rushing to the surface.It may well be that the straw in this instance was the local party's reassertion of its support for the candidacy of the awful Ann Keen at the forthcoming general election in the face of all the revelations about her expense claims, her taxpayer-funded second home, the mysteries surrounding the fact that neither she nor her husband would seem to have been anywhere near their "first" home for over a year, and the controversy around her claim for private medical treatment.It is obvious to me that decent members were hanging on to the slender hope that the party would replace her with an electable candidate. Their hopes were cruelly dashed by the news, which for some peculiar reason the local party deemed worthy of a big publicity splash when, in strategic terms, it was about as deserving of announcement as an outbreak of flatulence in a crowded lift. The question is, now the deed has been done, do they stand and watch as what is left of the local party kisses its ass goodbye, or do they search for a radical solution to the party's predicament?We are always willing to speak, with strictest confidence assured, with any well-meaning member of the local Labour Party who is concerned for its future. We believe that the existence of a Labour Party, in some form or another, is not only desirable but essential to our local politics. With those party members who desire to see a stronger, more vibrant and engaged community - and there are certainly some - we have a commonality of interest.As Bob Hoskins will tell you, it's good to talk.from A Community In Action - http://philandrews.blogspot.com

Phil Andrews ● 6300d26 Comments ● 6271d

Nearly 100 residents turn out for MRAG's same-day Mogden protest

Nearly 100 local residents come out onto the streets at very short notice yesterday to register their disgust at the decision by Hounslow's Sustainable Development Committee to approve an application by Thames Water to expand capacity at its Mogden plant by over 50%.The demonstration, organised the same morning, took Thames bosses completely by surprise as they hosted a meeting of the "Mogden Residents' Liaison Committee", a talking shop organised by the water company at which council officers from Hounslow and Richmond along with a small, select group of actual residents are given the opportunity to marvel at Thames' commitment to eradicating the odour and mosquito nuisance that it has inflicted upon the neighbouring community for decades and to watch slick slideshow presentations over sandwiches and fruit juice.Earlier in the day volunteers from MRAG and the ICG had leafleted 6,000 local properties alerting them to the decision and its consequences.The demonstration was attended amongst others by delegates from Ivybridge, the Worton estate, Twickenham and Hounslow South."Just like the old days", one ICG member commented as the campaign came to Ivybridge in earnest earlier in the day.It's not just about public demonstrations,of course.  A lot of work is also going on behind the scenes with a view to either challenging or overturning the SDC decision on a number of grounds, and neither are residents prepared simply to roll over and accept that officers of the council can choose to withhold vital information from members of SDC and not be held to account.  For those who think this is going away I have only bad news.In the meantime residents living within sniffing distance of Mogden can be assured that we will continue to fight every inch of the way until Thames finally condescends to honour its statutory obligations and deal with the problems it causes.

Phil Andrews ● 6428d35 Comments ● 6272d