Forum Topics

Kew Village Market - Sunday 7th April

‘The hidden gem’That’s how the Mayor of Richmond, Rita Palmer, a great supporter, described Kew Village Market last month. She went on to say: ‘Of course it’s becoming known much wider afield because of its wonderful atmosphere and quality foods and crafts. I feel proud to be part of its success!’ she added. It’s a feeling echoed by all the organisers, especially when looking back. The market is so right for Kew it seems as though it’s always been there – but in fact it only came into being a year and a half ago. Many of the stallholders who made the leap of faith to take part in the very first Kew Village Market have become its seasoned regulars and will be with us as usual this Sunday, 7th April. If, like the Mayor, you’ll be shopping for your Sunday lunch, you can take your pick of seasonal lamb and rose veal from C&S Stileman or British Lop pork from Noggin Farm (now also selling eggs). Select your week’s vegetables from Beech Hill Farm, with perhaps some Howgate Wonders for an apple crumble, and be spoilt for choice at Norbiton Cheese. Treat yourself to a flavour of A Cena with something savoury from The Food on the Hill, partner of the acclaimed Richmond restaurant, or to Indian delicacies from Kew favourite The Curry Garden. Sample the best of British beer from Real Ale Ltd and pick up a speciality loaf or two from Ruben’s Bakehouse (whose stall at Kew Market has been such a success he’s opened a shop in Twickenham). If your craving is cake-shaped, Sugar Maddy is a must, or you can stop at The Original Maids of Honour for a whole range of beautiful bakes. Discover the wonders of linseed at Flax Farm and tuck into very moreish spicy nibbles at Nutty Lady Ltd. And if you’re in the market for a gift, don’t miss Holly Francesca’s original artwork and home accessories or Becky Harris’s unique yet  affordable jewellery. Since all the above first set up their stalls in Station Parade, the market has nearly doubled in size – you can find a full list of this month’s stalls on www.kewvillagemarket.org. We’re grateful to all our stallholders (and indeed our customers) who make the market what it is – but special thanks this month to our pioneers! Looking forward to seeing you this Sunday, 7th April, 10am to 2pm!

Hilde Bysheim ● 4958d0 Comments ● 4958d

April fools

Great post on the Chiswick's W4 siteBrentford and QPR could share new 60,000 capacity groundLatest ChiswickW4.com NewsClub Merger Could Triple Size of Lionel Road StadiumA Clean Sweep for the Dark BluesChiswick Postmistress Sent to the TowerIt's the Tabard What Dun It - Again!Chiswick's Cafe Culture Attracts Foreign Buyers ParticipateSign up for our free weekly newsletter Comment on this story on the forumThe football world is set to be rocked today with an announcement about a merger between two of West London's clubs. Brentford F.C. and Queens Park Rangers are believed to be in advanced stages of discussions about a deal which will see the two clubs come under the ownership of the same company to make their new home in a 60,000 seat stadium at the Lionel Road site. Computer graphic of new stadiumBrentford FC are believed to be taken aback by the negative reaction to the enabling development which was to provide them with the funds to build a new ground at Lionel Road. The massive commercial and residential development would see ten new tower blocks of up to 14 storeys high built on the border of Chiswick and Brentford.Under the arrangement with QPR and a consortium of oil-rich backers the plans are now to be drastically overhauled with the stadium tripling in size to accommodate top flight football but the surrounding development to be much smaller in scale.One reason for Brentford to consider the offer from QPR is that extra funding will be available for the ground allowing a larger stadium to be built and reducing the size of the surrounding development making planning permission more likely. The source of the extra capital has not been revealed but speculation is rife that Qatari investor Yuran Ap Rilful is backing the scheme.Current development would dominate the sky line in West ChiswickNew FA regulations are to be introduced to allow a club in the lower leagues to be under the same ownership as a premier league club and that team to operate as a feeder club for the team in the higher division. This system operates in Spain and the football authorities believe it will add to the financial stability of teams in the lower league and ensure that the top young talent with the top clubs get regular competitive football.QPR have been unsuccessful in their attempt to secure a site for their own ground and have concluded that Lionel Road would provide the only option. Sources close to the deal say that the Loftus Road based club were so desperate to agree to the deal that they agreed to many of Brentford's demands including changing their name to Griffin Rangers. In a huge gamble for the club they have also accepted that may have to drop down two divisions at the end of this season. The league rules stipulate that two teams under the same ownership cannot play in the same division so if Brentford were promoted from League One and QPR were relegated from the Premier League it would be Brentford that would play in the higher division under the terms of the deal. QPR's higher paid players like Ji Sung Park, Abdel Taarabt and Christopher Samba would move to Brentford while players like Shaun Derry and Clint Hill would probably stay along with Harry Redknapp with a team which would effectively be the Bees' B's.The literally incredible idea would be to create a new West London super club funded by oil money capable of challenging for top European honours. Spokeswomen for the consortium backing the deal, Avril Amadan said, “We want Brentford to be playing Barcelona rather than Barnet. We see them in the Champions League within three years.”They believe that a fan base big enough to attract a crowd big enough to fill the stadium will be easy to establish. Ms. Amadan said, “Recent events has shown that the position of a Russian oligarch isn't always stable and if Roman Abramovitch was to fall out of favour and no longer able to financially back Chelsea and they stopped being good, lots of their fans would be looking for a new team to support.”It is understood that QPR had previously talked with Fulham FC about a similar arrangement and possible merger. Negotiations progressed as far as a short list of names for the new team which included the Craven Queens and the Bush Cottagers but Mohammed Al Fayed refused to budge on joint ownership of the Michael Jackson statue.The consortium have dismissed concerns about transport infrastructure pointing out that there is a regular train to Kew Bridge and the 237, 267 and 391 buses go past the site. Under a green travel plan that will support their planning application they will have a scheme in which visiting supporters will be encouraged to ‘park and ride' by leaving their cars or coaches in the Grove Park area of Chiswick where there is currently no residents' parking zone.April 1, 2013

Kevin Farnan ● 4963d0 Comments ● 4963d

Brentford becoming Croydon?

I do hate the phrase ‘Landmark development’ used so frequently by the developers battling to build ever more high-rise buildings in Brentford.  ‘Landmark development’ is quite literally ‘buildings big enough to be used as landmarks’.  Those 1960’s concrete council tower blocks are landmarks, but not exactly one the council can be proud about.  And interestingly, on discovering quite how ugly they were after they had been built, the council rightly said these towers could not be used as a precedent for further tall buildings.  However every single developer points to them as setting the precedent for Brentford going high rise.Landmark developments stick out like a sore thumbs amidst the low rise Victorian and Edwardian property that is the real Brentford.  According to the article on the Lionel Road development, ‘If all the schemes with consent in Brentford were fully built and occupied, the population of Brentford would increase by over 40%’.  That’s just the schemes that already have consent!!  How many sore thumbs do we actually want?If you take a look at the artists image of the Lionel Road development you’ll see some of the games developers play to get these landmark developments past council planners: The artists image is taken at a considerable distance from the buildings to downplay their sheer bulk, the Victorian water tower is included in the foreground to dominate the image and draw your eye from the proposal, the Jet petrol station is prominent to subconsciously increase the rundown feel of an area needing new life, there are absolutely no Victorian or Edwardian houses of Brentford proper to be seen, and there are only 2 cars on the road – even though 950 more flats will increase the car population of Brentford by oh about 950 cars!This high rise Croydonisation of Brentford is getting out of control and transforming a low rise borough into a Landmark of vulgarity and monstrosity.

Lorne Gifford ● 4966d6 Comments ● 4963d

Brentford FC. Football club or property developer?

It's a huge conundrum.The club I have been a supporter of since 1963. All the years of faded glory, dashed aspirations, and almost success.  But all the same, the club I follow and watch above all others.Anyone who follows Brentford knows Griffin Park is far from perfect, but the ground is known far more widely than ought to be by the proximity of the four pubs on each corner. Unique in world football.The ground is a firmly rooted site for fans and one of the season highlights for visiting fans.It's not Stamford Bridge, but it is arguably better than Craven Cottage.But now it's a dilemma. Is the club now a football club or a property developer?As a resident, like most around here, we tolerate the hustle and bustle of matchdays, the cars, the noise and the crowds. and in years gone by, the agro.But it is what keeps this long neglected town alive and vibrant and keeps alive it's industrial and social past. It's been here as long as most of the streets around it, and if you don't like it, well go live somewhere else, it wasn't imposed out of the blue like some of the other stuff appearing around hereIf Brentford FC have to move then I, as with most, am (or was) delighted that the new site is just a mile away and still in Brentford.  Like the Watermans, move it out of it's spiritual home and it risks terminal decline.But all around this town are ill-designed and overblown luxury developments. Housing for the investors and the wealthy. Nothing of quality nor affordable. It is sprouting up and looming, almost surrounding the old town and bringing no benefits, just a long list of problems and burdens to the inhabitants and community of Brentford.The proposed development by the football club just adds to that and if granted will just give a green light to all the other developers who are queuing up to turn the riverside town into a hi-rise metropolis.It is flawed, badly flawed, and I suspect nothing more than a quick revision of the former site owners proposals which probably would not have got approved. For a medium to large stadium to have almost no parking is a recipe for failure. If fans were going to come to Brentford en masse by train they already would. South Ealing is a 5 to 10 min bus ride and a 15 min walk. Brentford just 5 mins away, 7 bus routes ranging from 30 seconds to 5 mins away as well.But most Championship and league One sides are not connected by these lines. Brentford and Gunnersbury are on Branch lines and not connected to the mainlines to the north, east and west of the country. Fans will still only come by car and coach.The complete lack of open space, health, education and all the other facilities to facilitate a harmonious and decent quality of life for inhabitants is totally devoid, not just in this scheme but in all the others. In fact, the whole place is already beyond breaking point and cannot deliver quality anything.Yet our elected councillors it seems, regardless of party colours cannot or will not make any sort of stand to accommodate this. In fact they are almost doing the opposite and letting things roll. How they can keep approving luxury developments and yet approve piddly little token projects under affordable of shared partnerships seems completely inconsistent or incompetent.These proposed developments are way too high,way too dense and too convoluted to be justify a benefit to simply the football club's well being. At the expense of the people of Brentford?  The very same people who have been the backbone of the club to this very day?It is perplexing, I want the club to be successful, but primarily on the pitch. but not successful to the detriment of Brentford the town.

Anthony Waller ● 4967d5 Comments ● 4965d