Forum Topics

Brentford Transition Town report + film screening info.

The first meeting to discuss the initiation of a Transition Town project in Brentford got off to a lively and exciting start with over 20 local people converging on a meeting room at 108 High Street Brentford last Tuesday.  For a brief description of the event please see the end of this post.At the meeting we agreed our next activity would be a free film showing of  ‘In Transition’ : 'the first detailed film about the Transition movement. The Transition movement is about communities around the world responding to peak oil and climate change with creativity, imagination and humour, and setting about rebuilding their local economies and communities. It is positive, solutions focused, viral and fun.'  This film is good for those who want to find out more about what a Transition project means.  There will be a discussion following the film as well as refreshments.  'In Transition' will be showing free at 108 High Street (next to Paddy Power) on Tuesday 8th February at 7PM.  Please come along and invite anyone you like.   We hope to see you at the film screening.  Should you have any questions or ideas, please contact us on the email: communityfoodgrowers@gmail.com.  There will also be a meeting on the 22nd February to organise the Transition Town project in Brentford (More details TBC). Best regards Brentford Transitioners! PS:  If you want to be put on the mailing list, please email:  Communityfoodgrowers@gmail.com Summary of 1st meeting Following a brief go-around where participants said their name and where they were from as well as their interests, we had a short presentation from Lou Almond, who explained what a Transition Town Project was.  We then heard from Carrie from Transition Town Ealing who gave us a run through of the history of TTE, as well as a description of the sorts of activities that they have been engaging in. This was followed by a Q&A.  At this point, the group divided up into 5 smaller groups to engage in a discussion based on two questions:  'What would you like the objectives of TT Brentford to be?' and 'How would you like to achieve the objectives?'  After 15 minutes or so, the small groups came back into the main group and one person from each delivered a summary of what the group had come up with.  The diversity in the responses, views and opinions of the groups reflected the diverse backgrounds of the participants. Responses included a desired aim to localise food production through community gardens, working with the council and guerrilla gardening!  Others expressed interest in stimulating the local economy through the creation of a local currency, and rejuvenating the High Street in Brentford.  The meeting produced an excellent range of exciting and visionary ideas which if carried through would definitely have a positive and profound effect on the local area in the years to come. If you are interested in taking part, please look out for more messages concerning our meeting on Feb 22nd. 

Simon Moore ● 5757d0 Comments ● 5757d

The ultimate herbal remedy: Can cannabis improve autism?

This is a brilliant article from the Independant and a real must read /must be read one!!!The debate over its risks has split political and scientific opinion in Britain. But American mother Marie Myung-Ok Lee says cannabis isn't only safe enough for her autistic son – it's dramatically improved his conditionThursday, 5 November 2009My son, J, has autism. He's also had two serious operations for a spinal cord tumour and has an inflammatory bowel condition, all of which may be causing him pain, if he could tell us. He can say words, but many of them – "duck in the water, duck in the water", for instance – don't convey what he means. For a time, anti-inflammatory medication seemed to control his pain. But in the last year, it stopped working. He began to bite and to smack the glasses off my face. If you were in that much pain, you'd probably want to hit someone, too.J's school called my husband and me in for a meeting about J's tantrums, which were affecting his ability to learn. The teachers were wearing Tae Kwon Do arm pads to protect themselves against his biting. Their solution was to hand us a list of child psychiatrists. As autistic children can't exactly do talk therapy, this meant using sedating, antipsychotic drugs like Risperdal.Last year, Risperdal was prescribed for more than 389,000 children in the US – 240,000 of them under the age of 12 – for bipolar disorder, ADHD, autism and other disorders. Yet the drug has never been tested for long-term safety in children and carries a severe warning of side-effects. From 2000 to 2004, Risperdal, or one of five other popular drugs also classified as "atypical antipsychotics", was the "primary suspect" in 45 paediatric deaths, according to a review of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data by USA Today. When I canvassed parents of autistic children who take Risperdal, I didn't hear a single story of an improvement that seemed worth the risks. A 2002 study on the use of Risperdal for autism, in The New England Journal of Medicine, showed moderate improvements in "autistic irritation" – but the study followed only 49 children over eight weeks, which limits the inferences that can be drawn from it.Related articlesMinister gives warning over strong cannabisSearch the news archive for more storiesWe met with J's doctor, who'd read the studies and agreed: No Risperdal or its kin. The school called us in again. What were we going to do, they asked. As an occasional health writer and blogger, I was intrigued when a homeopath suggested medical marijuana. Cannabis has long-documented effects as an analgesic and an anxiety modulator. Best of all, it is safe. The homeopath referred me to a publication by the Autism Research Institute describing cases of reduced aggression, with no permanent side- effects. Rats given 40 times the psychoactive level merely fall sleep. Dr Lester Grinspoon, an emeritus professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School who has been researching cannabis for 40 years, says he has yet to encounter a case of marijuana causing a death, even from lung cancer.A prescription drug called Marinol, which contains a synthetic cannabinoid, seemed mainstream enough to bring up with J's doctor. I cannot say that with a few little pills everything turned around. But after about a week of fiddling with the dosage, J began garnering a few glowing school reports: "J was a pleasure have in speech class," instead of "J had 300 aggressions today."But J tends to build tolerance to synthetics, and in a few months we could see the aggressive behaviour coming back. One night, I went to the meeting of a medical marijuana patient advocacy group on the campus of the college where I teach. The patients told me that Marinol couldn't compare to marijuana, the plant, which has at least 60 cannabinoids to Marinol's one.***Rhode Island, where we live, is one of 13 states where the use of medical marijuana is legal. But I was resistant. My late father was an anaesthesiologist, and compared with the precise drugs he worked with, I know he would think marijuana to be ridiculously imprecise and unscientific. I looked at my son's tie-dye socks (his avowed favourite). At his school, I was already the weirdo mom who packed lunches with organic kale and kimchi and wouldn't let him eat any "fun" foods with artificial dyes. Now, I'd be the mom who shunned the standard operating procedure and gave her kid pot instead.I thought back to when J was 18 months old. We were vacationing on the Cape, and, although he just had the slightest hitch in his gait, I was sure there was something wrong. His paediatrician laughed. I called back repeatedly until a different doctor agreed to see us. J was taken in for emergency surgery, to remove a tumour that was on the verge of inflicting irreparable damage. Sometimes, you just have to go with your gut.And yet, I still hesitated. The Marinol had been disorienting enough – no protocol to follow, just trying varying numbers of pills and hoping for the best. Now we were dealing with an illegal drug, one for which few evidence-based scientific studies existed, precisely because it is an illegal drug. But when I sent J's doctor the physician's form that is mandatory for medical marijuana licensing, it came back signed. We underwent a background check with the Rhode Island Bureau of Criminal Identification, and J became the state's youngest licensee.Having a licence, however, is different from having access to marijuana. While California has a network of "compassion centres," basically pharmacy-like storefronts that provide quality product from registered growers, Rhode Island's Republican governor has consistently vetoed that idea, despite the local stories of frail patients being mugged in downtown Providence as they go in search of pot. We weren't about to purchase street marijuana, which could be contaminated with other drugs, so we looked into growing the pot ourselves. But by law, medical marijuana must be grown indoors, and it requires a separate room with a complex system of hydroponics, fans and precise lighting schedules. (This made me wonder how much THC, the main psychoactive substance found in cannabis, was actually in the spindly plants the high school goofballs I knew grew in their closets).The coordinator of our patient group introduced us to a licensed grower. A recent horticulture school graduate, he'd figured out how to cultivate marijuana using a custom organic soil mix. His e-mail signature even quoted Rudolf Steiner. The grower arrived at our house with a knapsack containing jars of herbs. We opened the jars to sniff the different strains of "bud" – Blueberry, which did smell fleetingly of wild blueberries, and Sour Diesel, which had a rich, winey scent. The grower had also cured some leaves for tea, and he brought a glycerine tincture, a marijuana distillate in olive oil (yes, organic), cookies (ditto), and a strange machine that looked, fittingly, like a lava lamp. Basically an almost-bong, this vaporiser heated the cannabis without producing carcinogenic smoke.For most adults, the vaporiser is the delivery method of choice, as it allows the patient to feel the effects immediately and adjust the dose precisely. J gamely put his mouth on the valve and let us squeeze a little smoke into him. It shot right back out of his nose. He looked like Puff the Magic Dragon. The grower left us with a month's worth of marijuana tea, glycerine, and olive oil – and a cookie recipe. No buds. We paid $80 (£50).We made the cookies with the marijuana olive oil, starting J off with half a small cookie, eaten after dinner. J normally goes to bed around 7.30pm; by 6.30 he declared he was tired and conked out. We checked on him hourly. As we anxiously peeked in, half-expecting some red-eyed ogre from Reefer Madness to come leaping out at us, we saw instead that he was sleeping peacefully. Usually, his sleep is shallow and restless. J also woke up happy.But in a few days, J decided he didn't like the cookie anymore and smashed it with his fist. We brewed him the tea, which smelled funky and grassy. He slurped it down, but it didn't seem to do much. Many of the psychoactive compounds in marijuana are fat soluble, so I added a dropperful of the oil that we used in the cookies. That made him sleepy-looking but still aggressive. It became clear that when J ingested pot orally, it took two hours to see the results, and by then there wasn't much we could do to dial the dose up or down. The grower visited us again to give J another try at the bong, but with little success.Perhaps J needed a little time to get off the Marinol. After two weeks, we noticed a slight but consistent lessening of aggression. And he wasn't nervously chewing holes in his shirts.***A month or so into the treatment, it was still too early to know if we could find a dose and mode of delivery that would give us consistent results. Even if J could learn to use the vaporiser, it costs $600 and would leave the house reeking of pot. And we didn't want to get too dependent, because of the inherent limitations. Though we'd love to calm J with pot so that he can visit his grandmother in Minnesota, bringing a controlled substance on the plane isn't the best idea.But since we started him on his "special tea," J's little face, which is sometimes a mask of pain, has softened. He's smiled more. For most of the last year, his individual education plan at his special-needs school was full of blanks, recording "no progress" because he spent his whole day an irritated, frustrated mess. But soon after starting on the tea, his reports began to show real progress, including "two community outings with the absence of aggressions".My husband and I are both academics and writers (me, novelist and essayist; he, historian), given to close observation and note taking. It was these habits that finally helped us see our son's allergic sensitivity to certain foods and seek advice from a gastroenterologist for his behaviours – aggression and chronic diarrhoea – instead of the recommended psychiatrist. (Gut pain and digestive problems, coined as "autistic entercolitis", are now considered a common biological affliction of many autistic children).At first we weren't sure if we were seeing results from the cannabis, but after about three months, which included weekly consultations with our grower as we experimented with different strains, we observed a much happier and outgoing child – who did not act or appear "stoned" in any way. Four months in, J came home from school and I noticed something different. Pre-pot, J ate the collars of his shirts, teasing his clothes apart and swallowing the threads. There's a name for this disorder – pica (pregnant women sometimes chew on chalk). It got so bad he ate his pyjamas and we had to start dressing him in organic cotton shirts. Then one day he came home from school wearing a whole shirt.J's school reports improved too. At one parent meeting, his teacher produced the latest "aggression" chart, showing attempts or instances of hitting, kicking biting or pinching other people. For a year he had scored an average of 30 to 50 aggressions a day, with a high of 300. The latest data showed days, sometimes consecutive, with zero aggressions. And on the school bus, J has transformed from a child who has hit the driver in the face and bitten people into a sparkly eyed boy who says hi and quietly takes his seat.***There's a twist to this happy story, though. The aggression has eased but J's autism has become more distinct. His vocal outbursts – screams, barks, yips of happiness – still happen and while our home is no longer full of thrown food, broken dishes and scratched faces, we still see people in the local area react to a family that remains different – and not always to their liking. There's a father on the next street who stops playing ball with his son when we approach. A mother won't make eye contact and ignored a party invitation. Most people responded well to J but sometimes we feel we're being shunned.Marijuana isn't a miracle cure for autism. But in our son's case it eases his pain and inflammation so dramatically that he can participate in life and learning again. It also protects him from the sometimes dangerous side-effects of pharmaceutical drugs. We have settled on a good strain (White Russian, a favourite pain-reliever for end-stage cancer patients) and a good dose. And now he's not in pain, J can go to school instead of a children's psychiatric hospital, where all too many of his peers end up as a result of violent behaviour.When I think of the embarrassment I may feel if my colleagues see this article, or teachers or parents at J's school, or his less open-minded doctors, I pause. Although I occasionally smoked pot as a teenager (believe me, in northern Minnesota, there was not much else to do), now that I'm a law-abiding adult, all the scary anti-drug messages are flashing in my brain. But when I researched cannabis the way I did conventional drugs, it seemed clear that marijuana wouldn't harm J, and might help. It's strange that the virtues of such a useful and harmless botanical have been so clouded by stigma. Even the limited studies that have been done suggest marijuana's potential as an adjunctive therapy for cancer. Marijuana, you need some re-branding. Maybe a cool new name.One of the biggest tests for J through this journey was a visit from Grandma. The last time she came, over Christmas, J hit her during a tantrum. This time, we gave him his tea, mixing it with goji berries to mask any odour, although it occurs to me that my mother, a Korean immigrant, probably doesn't even know what pot smells like (it actually smells a lot like ssuk, a Korean medicinal herb). She remarked that J seemed calmer. As we were preparing for a trip to the park, J disappeared, and we wondered if he was going to throw one of his tantrums. Instead, he returned with Grandma's shoes, laying them in front of her, even carefully adjusting them so that they were parallel and easy to step into. He looked into her face, and smiled.What are the downsides to this experiment?By Jeremy Laurance, Health EditorThe first reaction of most parents to Marie Myung-Ok Lee's story is likely to be one of surprise, shock, even horror. What is she doing turning her nine-year-old son into a pot-head? Has she not heard of the dangers of cannabis smoking to the mental health of adolescents, never mind the disorienting effects of an intoxicating substance on one so young?Possibly this will be their second and third reactions, too. Ms Myung-Ok Lee was giving her son, J, cannabis to relieve pain (from his spinal tumour and inflamed gut), not just to treat his autism. Even so, the stigma that surrounds illegal drugs is so deeply entrenched, just because they are illegal, that many people are simply not prepared to weigh up their benefits and harms.We have seen in the row this week over the sacking of the UK Government's chief drugs adviser, Professor David Nutt, how the debate over drugs is driven more by fear, emotion and political calculation than by scientific evidence. The Labour Government, facing possible annihilation at the next election, is anxious to be seen to be tough on drugs – so the outspoken Professor Nutt had to go.As an academic, Ms Myung-Ok Lee is perhaps better placed than many to resist the voices of unreason and take a cool look at the evidence. Cannabis, as she points out, is already prescribed as a pain killer, as an anti-nausea agent for cancer sufferers and as a treatment for multiple sclerosis. In all these areas it has been shown to be effective, though there is debate about just how effective. In the UK, it is available as Sativex, a spray taken under the tongue, which contains a cannabis extract. More than 1,200 patients in the UK have received it for relief of symptoms associated with multiple sclerosis. It is not, however, prescribed to nine-year-olds (or anyone under 18).Ms Myung-Ok Lee started her son on medicinal cannabis, and then went a step further by giving him the herbal kind, as a tincture or baked in a cookie. This, too, is not without precedent – among adults. There have been frequent reports of patients smoking cannabis and gaining relief from pain or the spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis, and in the UK when they have been prosecuted for possession of a controlled drug, the courts have shown leniency.But in trying herbal cannabis on her son, Ms Myung-Ok Lee and her doctor have stepped beyond even the anecdotal evidence, into the unknown. J became Rhode Island's youngest ever patient licensed to use marijuana for medical reasons.She acknowledges it is an experiment, but she reasons that as cannabis has low toxicity and is safer than most other drugs, the risks are low. Any parent, confronted with a screaming, suffering child who is so distressed that he smashes things, hits people and tears at his clothing with his teeth, must feel sympathy for her. In that situation, which of us would not try anything to ease our child's pain? Moreover, the experiment appears to have worked – at least for the first few months.The difficult questions are: will the effect last? Will there be a downside to using the drug in one so young? Is the effect real? The last question is the trickiest. Children grow and change and those with autism are no different from the rest. The changes his parents have noticed in J might have happened anyway, as part of his natural development. The cannabis could turn out to be a coincidental factor, with zero impact on his condition. It was coincidence that led to the scare over MMR and autism – because the first symptoms of the condition typically occur around 14 months which is the age at which babies receive their first MMR jab.It would be a disaster if cannabis came to be seen as a panacea for children in the same situation, on the basis of this anecdotal report. As always in science, we need more evidence.

Philip Walsh ● 5758d1 Comments ● 5758d

Medicinal Herbs Will Disappear in EU and we are the only ones who can stop this.

This is not a post about Cannabis but it would be included; this is a post from/to a facebook group. If you use any herbal remedy or preparation you should read on as they are about to be made illegal!!!Posted By: Heidi Stevenson  To: Members in Medicinal Herbs Will Disappear in EU and we are the only ones who can stop this  We're becoming known! And e-mail interview. I have just been interviewed by the French newspaper, l'Avenir, regarding the THMPD petition and also about just who I am to be pressing it. Here's my response, in full. Hello Marine, I hope the following explains the opposition to Directive 2004/24/EC and my role in it: The wording of Directive 2004/24/EC (The Herbal Medicinal Products Directive - THMPD) demonstrates a lack of good intentions, insofar as the herbal industry is concerned. It refers (in paragraph 7) to a "simplified registration", but no requirement for herbal registration has been applied before this time. How can a non-existent protocol be simplified? A completely new and draconian system of registration has been put in place for herbal products. Why? Harm from these products has been extremely minimal. They are now expected to meet the same standards as pharmaceutical drugs--but they aren't drugs. The fact that many drugs were originally derived from them does not make a herb in its natural form a drug, other than by the most twisted logic. To expect herbs to meet the same standards as drugs completely misunderstands their heritage and use. The systems by which they're applied do not operate under the same logic as pharmaceutical drugs. For this, we should be grateful, since the history of Big Pharma's products is one of devastation and death. Just look to Vioxx and thalidomide to see the truth. Nothing in the ancient history of herbal use comes close, yet THMPD insists that they be expected to meet the same standards. If they did, we should worry! It's obvious that THMPD does not serve the needs of the public. Rather, it serves the will of multinational corporate interests to limit competition. The "harmonisation" referenced does nothing to benefit the needs of the people. The requirement that safety be proven, as specified in item 5, is unneeded, unreasonable, and draconian. If THMPD were innocuous, then why will all non-EU based herbal systems be banned as of next April Fool's Day? All Chinese, Ayurvedic, and other herbal systems that many Europeans rely on will become unavailable once stocks have been depleted. How can this benefit the thousands of people who rely on them and other herbal systems to maintain their health? European based herbs will be severely restricted, with few being able to meet the expensive and confusing requirements. Most manufacturers are small businesses and do not have the resources. This has been clearly demonstrated by the fact that only a handful of them have been able to maneuver the system set in place by THMPD, even though it's been in effect since 2004. It's painfully obvious that THMPD will clear the field of competition for Big Pharma. It will also remove the people's right to use nature's bounty. I am a homeopath in Scotland, practicing as Gaia Therapy and I produce the website Gaia Health (http://gaia-health.com). I do not use herbs in my practice and have no financial interest in these products. My background includes research and technical writing, especially in computer science. My interest in this campaign is human rights. The right to manage one's health, freely using personally chosen methods and products, is so obvious that it has never been considered necessary to specify it as a separate right along with the right of free speech. The EU is abrogating that unwritten right with THMPD, along with the supplements Directive 2002/46/EC. It's interesting to note that Thomas Jefferson, the author of the United States' Declaration of Independence, stated, "Was the government to prescribe to us our medicine and diet, our bodies would be in such keeping as our souls are now." That is precisely what the EU is attempting to do. If successful, it will result in the utter destruction of our health: the deliverance of our bodies to multinational corporations to do with as they wish. The more I learned, the more outraged I became. The Alliance for Natural Health has taken up the banner for this issue. Their approach is to institute a lawsuit (http://www.anh-usa.org/traditional-medicines-to-become-illegal-in-europe/). My belief is that this is an issue that the people need to address. There did not appear to be an existing petition that could do the job. I contacted Avaaz and asked them to take it on, but they refused, saying that they were booked for months in advance. It became clear that, if I didn't take this on, then THMPD would probably come to pass. I hope to be able to carry it forward. Regards, Heidi Stevenson Please, everyone - Invite your friends to join the Cause and to sign the petition!

Philip Walsh ● 5837d10 Comments ● 5759d

End the fisheries discard disgrace - Write to your MP

Dear Ms Macleod - ( email mary.macleod.mp@parliament.uk  ) As one of your constituents, I am writing to ask you to sign Early Day Motion 1123: Fish Fight campaign, which calls on the new government to eliminate discards from our fisheries. Discarding is an environmentally and economically damaging practice: up to half of the fish trawled from the North Sea are thrown back dead or dying because of the current quota system imposed by the EU’s disastrous Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) which is due for reform.I am supporting the Fish Fight campaign because I am deeply concerned about this senseless waste of food and I want this shameful practice to end. The campaign is backed by the fishing industry, environmental groups (including environmental law organisation ClientEarth and the Marine Conservation Society among others), and fast-growing numbers of the general public. Now it needs all-party government support.As my representative to parliament, I urge you to add your signature to this Early Day Motion, to show the UK has a united ask for the CFP: end discards. For your convenience, the text of the Early Day Motion is reproduced below this emailr. More information on the campaign can be found at the Fish Fight website.Thank you for your support,Kind regardsName & addressFISH FIGHT CAMPAIGNGoldsmith, Zac That this House welcomes the resolution of the `Fish Fight' campaign to eliminate the environmentally and economically damaging practice of discarding fish before landing; is concerned that up to half of all fish trawled in the North Sea are thrown back either dead or dying; further welcomes the campaign's support for the sustainable use of discard species by retailers, suppliers and restaurants to stimulate the creation of new markets for lesser known species; and calls on the Government to demand strong reform of the European Union Common Fisheries Policy to institute a regionalised, ecosystems-based management framework which incentivises the use of selective gear, uses real-time management, including temporary closures, and establishes ecosystem catch quotas rather than single-species landing quotas.

Steve Taylor ● 5763d9 Comments ● 5762d