Forum Topics

LBH Executive approves £1.5m package to empower tenants and leaseholders

The Council's Executive last night unanimously approved my proposal to make up to £1.5m available from the Housing Revenue Account for resident-led estate improvement projects.Tenants' and residents' associations on estates managed by Hounslow Homes will be able to bid for serious money for projects such as play facilities, refurbishing community centres, landscaping and suchlike.It will be for residents, not Hounslow Homes or the council, to identify those projects which it is felt are most needed and to make the case for a grant application.  Hounslow Homes and the local authority will be on hand to advise, and to assist, as well as of course to evaluate issues such as ongoing maintenance, but the leadership of the projects will come entirely from the community.My purpose in launching this radical new initiative is, quite unashamedly, to empower residents on our estates, and to encourage them to participate in estate life by helping to give associations real clout.  A thriving and active community is the best defence there is against the cronyism and cliqueishness which has stifled the tenants' movement on some of our estates in the past, and which leads to demoralisation and large-scale abstention from the process.This will be just the first of many empowerment initiatives which will take place during the lifetime of this administration, not just on estates managed by Hounslow Homes but throughout the community, following the Motion passed by Borough Council on March 4th (which has been discussed at length previously on this forum).The programme will be formally launched at the Annual Conference of the Hounslow Federation of Tenants' & Residents Associations (HFTRA) in May.

Phil Andrews ● 6793d43 Comments ● 6779d

Wanted - New Labour support for ICG policy

No, you did read this correctly!Some users of this forum may be aware that the local authority recently took possession of several properties on Twickenham Road, Isleworth, which had previously been managed by Co-op Homes but which had always been owned by the London Borough of Hounslow.Additionally, we reclaimed another property in Chiswick which had also previously been let by Co-op.  We sold the property in Chiswick on the open market, and used the proceeds of that sale to refurbish the Isleworth properties, and in some cases to convert them into larger properties, so that we could let them out to large families who were currently on our housing list.Now I accept that there will be different views as to whether or not we were right to take these properties back under the wing of the local council, however that is not the issue which I raise here.The refurbished properties in Twickenham Road are now being let out to families which meet the criteria in terms of household size.  As it happens most, if not all, of these tenancies happen to have been allocated to families who are from minority ethnic groups.I have made the necessary enquiries and am completely satisfied that due process has been followed, and that all allocations have been made solely on the basis of the greatest need.However, I have to report that there has been a fundamentally racist reaction on the part of a small number of neighbouring residents to the occupation of these dwellings by these new, incoming families.There exists, of course, in such a climate, the potential for unscrupulous elements to try to take advantage of the situation which has arisen, for short-term political gain.  We have witnessed, during the two most recent local election campaigns, the preparedness of New Labour to stir up racial unrest in Isleworth where it previously hadn't existed in the hope of securing a few extra votes. I therefore call upon all New Labour politicians, past and present, who use this forum to state unequivocally that they support in principle our policy of allocating these properties on the basis of housing need without any consideration whatsoever of the ethnic and cultural background of those residents concerned.I further call upon them to offer me their public assurance, here and now, that they will not seek in any way to exploit the dissatisfaction which has arisen amongst a very small section of the surrounding community as a result of these allocations.Specifically, I seek such assurances from Councillor Ruth Cadbury (TW8 resident and Deputy Leader of the LBH Labour Group), David Hughes (regular Labour Party spokesperson on this forum), Alan Sheerins (ditto), and Vanessa Smith and Councillor John Connelly (ex-Labour Party members and still frequent apologists for the Labour Party both locally and nationally on this forum) that our policy on this matter is supported.In the light of the previous words and deeds of all of these people, no answer will not suffice.  I should state that to any past or present New Labour member responding to my post that I reserve the right to publicly quote any response which might be given.An opportunity has arisen for New Labour to demonstrate that it has some principles, and that its quest for votes is not completely unimpeded by considerations of basic morality.  I look forward to the responses (or non-responses!) of the aforementioned with some interest.

Phil Andrews ● 6801d49 Comments ● 6782d

Local Government Chronicle article upsets council staff

An article by Steve Fitzgerald Interim Director of finance at Hounslow, has managed to get up the noses of civic centre staff to whom the information contained within it came as something of a shock. Mr. Fitzgerald talks of a "large number of tiers of management". "What we are looking to do is to reduce it from 9 or 10 layers to as few as four or five". Those numbers are just fanciful. The article goes on 'But the main way that the council is seeking to deliver efficiencies is to remove 4,000 staff from the payroll'. Says Mr. Fitzgerald "There are people who don't want to be part of what's happening. We are giving people the opportunity to leave on fairly generous terms rather than becoming bogged down in Industrial Tribunals".People would dispute I am sure 9 or 10 layers of management which is just a product of his obviously very fertile imagination, or else he is just lying, and if 4,000 staff were to be "removed" from the payroll, there would be NO staff at all, the man is clearly delusional. You could be forgiven for thinking that the staff had been consulted at length about this "efficiency drive", they weren't they were told, and if the terms that are being offered are so "fairly generous" and of course legally O.K. why would you get "bogged down in Industrial Tribunals"?  The article further says that 'the main fruit of the efficiency drive so far has been to freeze council tax rates for two years', no, the aim was to freeze the council tax at all and any costs. Supposedly the Leadership O.K.d this drivel? Either way - this article which is full of wild assertions, not to say downright untruths, has done little to assuage the worries of the staff and promote any goodwill towards members, it is insulting, inaccurate and unacceptable. We can only hope someone has a word in Mr. Fitzgerald's shell like, and I know just the one.

Vanessa Smith ● 6813d45 Comments ● 6782d