Forum Topics

Questionmarks over Livingstone's campaign finances

A £20,000 donation to Ken Livingstone's 2004 re-election campaign from train drivers' union Aslef was never publicly declared, it was claimed today" according to tonight's Evening Standard. "The gift does not appear anywhere on the Electoral Commission's register, even though its rules suggest any donation that "specifies that it is for the benefit of a particular candidate" must be recorded. ""Aslef accounts reveal that in 2003 the union made a £20,000 donation to "Mayor of London Electoral Campaign", yet nothing appears under Mr Livingstone's name on the commission website. ""The revelation has prompted further questions about how Mr Livingstone is able to raise money without having to make donors public, by asserting the money goes to the central party coffers. ""The Conservatives say that Aslef has made commuters' lives a misery through industrial action. ""There was further confusion last night because the £20,000 Aslef donation does not appear to have been put on the party's national register either, although the union gave 13 separate donations totalling £53,914. The Labour Party denies that any donations have not been declared properly. ""Greg Hands, Conservative MP for Hammersmith and Fulham, has attacked the Mayor's arrangements for donations and demanded he make his campaign finances public. ""He said: "It is outrageous that London voters do not know who is funding Ken Livingstone's expensive campaign for reelection. The whole point of these rules is to allow transparency yet Livingstone hasn't declared a single donation given to him since 2000. "" "The £20,000 Aslef donation wasn't even declared by the Labour Party, which shows that their arrangements for reporting donations made to Ken Livingstone are utterly flawed. In the public interest, he should release details of his donations right now." "I wonder has Livingstone received funding from his friend Hugo Chavez, the authoritarian leader who has ruined Venezuela, or from people associated with the organisations given taxpayers' money by the London Development Agency ? Or from the suicide-bombing condoning mullahs he invited to share platforms with him in London ?

David Giles ● 6798d0 Comments ● 6798d

Conservative Party position on Heathrow Expansion

Everyone knows that the Conservative Party locally is opposed to Heathrow Expansion. Prospective Parliamentary Candidate Mary Macleod and her team have delivered over 45,000 leaflets in the constituency. Councillor Barbara Reid, Council Leader Peter Thompson and other Conservatives have long been campaigners against the Expansion. Our Conservative GLA Assembly Member Tony Arbour is a veterabn campaigner against Heathrow Expansion.Conservative London Mayoral Candidate Boris Johnson MP is against Heathrow Expansion. Richmonf Conservative PPC Zac Golsmith is against Heathrow Expansion. Locally the Conservative Party is the green party.Some people have asked questions about the position of the Conservative party nationally on this issue.In his speech opposing Heathrow Expansion at Methodist Central Hall, Westminster on 25th February 2007, Peter Ainsworth MP, Shadow Secretary of State for the Environment, repeatedly referred to the four criteria set out by Theresa Villiers MP, the Shadow Secretary of State for Transport, in her speech on 22nd November 2007.This is a quotation from www.conservatives.com "Thursday November 22, 2007Heathrow expansion has to satisfy four key environmental tests."Commenting on the Government's plans to consult on a third runway at Heathrow, Shadow Transport Secretary, Theresa Villiers, said: "Characteristically Ruth Kelly has refused to come to Parliament and answer MPs questions on these plans. This is not democracy. This is one of the most important decisions we face as a nation and it is scandalous that Ruth Kelly won't answer in Parliament to the MPs who represent people whose lives are directly impacted by the future Heathrow. Yet again she's running scared."We recognise that the economic arguments for expanding Heathrow are much stronger than any other airport in the South East but in a week when Gordon Brown tried to shore up his green credentials by talking about eighty percent cuts in emissions, Ruth Kelly has got some very tough questions to answer about Heathrow expansion."Before a decision can be made on this critically important issue, we believe that four tests must be met - on NOx pollution, on noise, on alternative ways to meet demand and free up capacity, and above all, on meeting our climate change targets."Enormous efforts are needed from the Government if all these safeguards are going to be put in place and I hope Ruth Kelly can reassure the public that she will work with us to ensure that any plans for the future of Heathrow are consistent with these key environmental goals." "End of quotation. This statement was made at the commencement of the Consultation- over 3 months ago.Since then, the Conservative Party has reviewed the Government's Consultation paper.Numerous representations have been made to Pater Ainsworth MP, Theresa Villiers and other Shadow Cabinet members on the matter and the Conservative Party position has firmed up as shown in Peter Ainsworth's speech last Tuesday night.Peter Ainsworth made it clear on Tuesday night that he believed that the Government had not met the 4 tests laid out by Thesesa Villiers last November, 2007. Thousands were there and heard him say it. I was there also and heard strong oposition to Heathrow Expansion from Boris  Johnson MP for Henley, Justine Greening MP for Putney and Councillor Barbara Reid of Hounslow representing the 2 M Group of Councils. Zac Goldsmith, Conservative PPC for Richmond, and a long time environmental activist and adviser to David Cameron MP, will be speaking at a meeting opposing Heathrow Expansion on Thursday 6th March, 2008 along with Terry Waite CBE.

David Giles ● 6828d12 Comments ● 6798d

Invitation to take part in research (Most Haunted)

Invitation to a discussion on haunted house television programmesResearchers from the University of Westminster are conducting a study on television programmes such as Most Haunted, Derren Brown’s Trick of the Mind, or related television, films or websites. During April 2008 we would like to interview you (for one and a half hours, with others) to talk about these programmes. We are interested in discussing what you think of ghost investigations, mediums, magic and illusions in the media. In today’s society, why do we still have a fascination in traditional ghost stories?This is a non-commercial project, led by Annette Hill who is writing a book about ghosts in contemporary society and culture. Please be assured your confidentiality would be respected and no names would be used in the project. Your input will be invaluable to our research.The group interviews will take place over a series of evenings from Monday 7th April to Thursday 24th April, with the first session from 6pm-7.30pm and the second session from 8pm-9.30pm in the University’s Regent Street building at 309, Regent Street, London, W1B 2UW. You would only be required to attend one of the sessions. We can provide light snacks and £20 to say thank you for your time and contribution. If you are interested in taking part, please email Lizzie Jackson at ghostmedia@hotmail.co.uk indicating your interest and giving your contact details including the best telephone number to call you on, and a good time of day to call. We will telephone you to ask a few initial questions and organise a time for you to attend the group interviews. We would love to know what you have to say on this subject.Thanks,Annette Hill and Lizzie Jackson

Lizzie Jackson ● 6807d0 Comments ● 6807d

Alistair Darling's Budget is one of the worst budgets ever

This is one of the worst budgets ever- even by Gordon Brown’s woeful standards. It will do nothing whatsoever to stimulate the economy, create employment and avoid recession. It will do very little to protect the environment as the so-called "green taxes" are simply just desperate revenue raising measures and are hypocritical coming from a Government which pursues global warming and environmentally disasterous policies such as Heathrow, Gatwick and Stanstead Expansion and coal-fired power stations.It will do nothing to get people out of the poverty trap or to stimulate the economy and help Britain thrive in an increasingly  competitive world.It will not protect Britain against recession and in fact may hasten recession and make it worse. It will not stimulate private sector employment.It does nothing to reduce real cost inflation for ordinary people which is now running at well over 7% per annum when rapidly rising food, housing, fuel and tranport prices are properly accounted for.It is backward rather than forward looking, regressive, unimaginative, much too complex, inefficient and economically illiterate. But there again Alistair Darling was a lawyer and Gordon Brown was and is still a historian and neither of them know very much about economics, poverty, business or the real economy.Alistair Darling fiddles while Brown broods and worries about his place in history.What we need now are very serious cuts in public expenditure, a massive downsizing of the bloated public sector, concentration of spending on front-line services, radical reform of Brown’s wasteful,complicated and inefficient tax and credit schemes, raising the basic  personal allowance for everyone to at least £10,000 a year (like in Ireland) to take the lower paid, pensioners and others out of the tax and benefits dependency traps, abolition of hundreds of quangoes, regional assemblies, advisory bodies and such like, strict control on the hiring of expensive private sector consultants to do the work which should be done by civil servants, reduction of corporation tax for small businesses to 15%, an end to foreign military adventures we cannot afford or sustain and a greater harmonisation of public spending throughout the Disunited Kingdom.And of course we need an end to the expensive, wasteful and immoral EU Common Agriculural and Fisheries Policies and the increasing transfers of British taxpayers' money and rights to the unelected, corrupt and unaccountable EU bureaucracy.The Conservative Party response so far has been adequate but not radical enough. It took an American journalist on Sky News this morning to remind us of the Laffer Curve, an economic concept widely accepted in the USA, Ireland and elsewhere which says that if you reduce taxes and give people the freedom to spend and invest their own money, the economy will be stimulated, more jobs will be created, exports will grow, companies will prosper and consequently tax revenues will grow allowing more money to be spent on defence, literacy, numeracy, education, health services, the police, prisons, pensions, infrastructure and the other essential functions of government.It is time to:Move Over, Darling.

David Giles ● 6813d1 Comments ● 6808d