Forum Topics

Heathrow Expansion ; Meeting Civic Centre, Hounslow , 7.30pm Tuesday 22nd January 2008

It’s time to say no (thousands already have)Local people are being urged to turn out in force and demonstrate their opposition to Heathrow expansion at a public meeting to be held in Hounslow on Tuesday 22 January.Around two thousand residents have already contacted Hounslow Council to say ‘no’ to  plans to double the airport’s capacity, and anyone who is opposed to expansion is being encouraged to do the same.The government is currently conducting a 14-week public consultation and as part of its ‘Say No’ campaign, Hounslow Council is keen to ensure that local people have every opportunity to register their views.Councillor Barbara Reid, the council’s lead member for aviation, said:  “The government is planning to embark on the biggest ever programme of airport expansion the country had ever seen. It is essential that every single person in the borough who is opposed to these plans makes their voice heard.“It is clear to everyone that expansion will mean more planes, more noise and more pollution. By turning out to the public meeting in force we can send a very clear and simple message to the government - Hounslow says ‘no’.”The public meeting will be held at the Civic Centre in Hounslow at 7.30pm on Tuesday 22 January 2008.In addition to attending the public meeting there are a number of different ways that people can register their support for the council’s ‘Say No’ campaign including:Joining the council’s Say No Facebook group at www.hounslow.gov.uk/heathrowFilling out and returning a Say No postcard Leaving a message of support on the Say No answerphone Emailing sayno@hounslow.gov.uk

John Todd ● 6866d34 Comments ● 6854d

"Green Insanity"

Just been looking at the TFL website about the new Low Emission Zone which starts officially on Monday. Is Livingstone clinically insane or what? This measure will destroy thousands of small businesses throughout Greater London who rely on their old "white vans" for transport. Someone on the news this morning was estimating a cost of some £4000 to make vehicles compliant with the new regulations - most of the vans in use are not worth £4000 and if the businesses concerned could afford a new van, no doubt they would already have one. Watch and wait while every single thing we buy in London, whether a service or a product, becomes significantly more expensive as companies have to add on the extraordinary cost of this new charge (or completely renew their transport fleet). It also includes fire engines????? and other public service vehicles. This is the most appalling example of gesture politics we have yet seen. Even if I thought Ken Livingstone was the best thing since sliced bread and I agreed with every other single thing he did, I would still vote against him for this piece of vicious anti-motorist nonsense. The man must be stopped.I must also admit a personal stake here. I have an Iveco van which I use for transporting my dogs to and from shows and races. More importantly it is large enough (which my car is not) to contain my disabled wife's electric buggy. If we want to go for a walk in the country, we run the buggy up the ramps into the van, load up the dogs and we are off for the day. From October 2010, we will be unable to use the van without incurring a £100 per day charge. We may even be liable for such a charge on a continuing daily basis as it is permanently parked within the LEZ. We cannot afford to modify the van as it is not worth £4000 and we certainly couldn't afford a newer model which satisfies the conditions. So, from 2010, Ken has effectively made us more or less housebound. Nice one Ken - just wait till May!

Mick Brent ● 6854d0 Comments ● 6854d

The Queen's bit of Terminal 5

I was amused by this bit (at the bottom of a longer article on how BAA might run out of cash next year....) I wonder if we could persuade Prince Charles or her Majesty not to agree to let BAA have the section of the Longford River under the third runway..........----------------------------------------------------------------------http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/transport/article3256269.eceTERMINAL PROBLEMBAA could be hit with an estimated £20m bill by the Crown Estate after it emerged the Queen’s property company owns a “ransom strip” under the airport owner’s flagship £4 billion Terminal Five development at London’s Heathrow, writes Jenny Davey.BAA is now locked in talks with the Crown over a compensation package that could stretch to tens of millions of pounds, according to experts.The Spanish-owned business insists that it knew the Crown owned the strip of land before it started construction of T5. But it pressed ahead with the work before a compensation figure had been agreed.The Crown Estate hands over all its revenue to the Treasury each year in return for the Civil List, which pays for the upkeep of the royal family. Property experts said the Crown had a duty to press for the highest possible compensation for the land from BAA because taxpayers’ money was at stake.The row centres on the Longford River, one of two river channels that have been diverted around the perimeter of the airport as part of the development.In a statement, the Crown Estate and BAA confirmed they were in talks but refused to comment on how much compensation would be paid.The Crown said: “The Crown Estate owns a strip of land under Heathrow Terminal Five. At the request of BAA and in the interests of allowing this major scheme of international importance to progress unhindered, the Crown Estate allowed the development of the terminal to begin, on the basis that suitable compensation would be agreed during its construction.”

Tim Henderson ● 6856d0 Comments ● 6856d

Ann Keen MP and Alan Keen MP named in Complaint

Ann Keen,MP for Brentford and Isleworth, and her husband, Alan Keen, MP for Feltham and Heston, have been named in a Freedom of Information Complaint against the House of Commons which was the subject of a  Decision by the Information Commissioner, Richard Thomas, on 13th June 2007.The Complaint was made to the Information Commissioner because the House of Commons refused to provide information regarding the Additional Costs Allowances claimed by the named MP's. Additional Cost Allowances are claimed by MP's for constituencies  outside Inner London in respect of accommodation in London. The Keens are entitled to and both claim Additional Cost Allowances because their constituences are in Outer London even though their home in Brentford is less than 10 miles from the House of Commons.In 2005/06, Ann Keen claimed £15,794 and Alan Keen claimed £14,494 in Additional Costs Allowances out of their total expenses claims of  £127,385 and £124,570 respectively.For details see:http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2007/fs_50071451.pdfThe other MP's mentioned are the former Prime Minister, Tony Blair MP for Sedgefield, Barbara Follett MP for Stevenage and John Wilkinson MP for Ruislip. The EU Commissioner, Peter Mandelson,the former MP for Hartlepool, is also named in the Decison. It appears that the House of Commons has 28 days in which to appeal against the decision and 35 days in which to provide the information. If the House of Commons does not appeal by 11th July, then the House of Commons has to provide the information by 18th July 2007.

David Giles ● 7073d6 Comments ● 6858d