Forum Topics

Gordon Brown can't bear to name Ken Livingstone.

Greg Hands, the MP for our neigbouring constituency of Hammersmith and Fulham, has posted the following on www.conservativehome.com today:"Gordon Brown can't bring himself to name Ken Livingstone.The enmity between Gordon Brown and Ken Livingstone is longstanding. In Tom Bower's biography of the PM, there are almost as many references in the index to Livingstone as there are to Neil Kinnock. "Major disagreements have included independence of the Bank of England, PPP for the tube, public spending levels in the late 1990s and so on. In 2000, Brown even penned a full-page article in the Evening Standard (19/1/2000 - not available online) urging London Labour members to back Frank Dobson, predicting "disaster" if Livingstone were elected. I recall that at that time Blair set himself a priority that Livingstone should not be a "Labour Mayor" - but Brown went one stage further, urging Livingstone not to be elected at all. "Livingstone is now mired in sleaze allegations, and Brown's first big election as Labour Leader is only 3 months away. At the weekend, Brown had little choice when asked by the press to back Livingstone, but could only bring himself to talk about Livingstone as "he". "Yesterday, at PMQs, I asked Brown about corruption at the LDA and whether the PM would support calls for an independent inquiry into the role of Livingstone. Again, Brown couldn't bring himself to name him, concluding weakly that "we need a Labour Mayor.""A strange world when a Party Leader can't bring himself to name his leading candidate. I think the last time this happened was in the Bermondsey by-election in 1983, when Michael Foot avoided endorsing Peter Tatchell. The omens aren't good for Labour here."-Greg Hands MPAnn Keen MP was also a strong supporter of Frank Dobson MP against Ken Livingstone in 2000 when Dobson was the official labour candidate and Livingstone had been expleed from the labour Party and ran as an Independent.Dobson came third after Livingstone and steve Norris, the Conservative candidate.I wonder does she share Gordon Brown's very evident enmity towards Livingstone ?

David Giles ● 6862d2 Comments ● 6862d

The Hounslow Chronicle Thursday 17th 2008

Two statements appear in this paper in two different articles and they show a strange attitude to upholding the law and public decency.In one on page 6 in an article concerning gay men having sex in public places such as Gunnersbury triangle (the local nature reserve visited by children) ch insp Andy Morgan insisted the practice was not a major issue in the borough and rarely provoked complaints it’s not a crime unless someone says it is. It usually happens late at night in secluded places and between consenting adults.Having spent time having to clear up the area of Osterley by Windmill lane also, used by the cottaging/ cruising/ dogging fraternity, I say it is. The whole area was full of rubbish old needles and discarded Durex. My children, now teenagers visited the Triangle many times as they grew up and many small children still do. The idea that this is not a problem is wrong, ask anyone doing community service about their experience of clearing up these sites if you doubt the seriousness of this problem.On page nine ch insp. Andy Morgan takes a different stance on a illegal practice also often carried out late at night between consenting adults only this time in the privacy of their own homes and with out turning public places into cess pits of discarded filth.I am talking about consuming cannabis. On this issue we get this rant from ch insp Mogan who believes downgrading cannabis has sent the wrong message to users and dealers. When Cannabis became declassified (it should have been but it wasn’t, it was downgraded) dealers thought the potential for them to be caught convicted and sentenced had been reduced, he said. (Why the penalties applicable under class B are the same as under Class C for these types of offences)It created an artificial belief we wouldn’t do much about people importing cannabis.Cannabis clearly leads to other crimes because there are big profits to be made (only because it’s illegal Andy)Also as people become unstable (after smoking the drug) they become more of a problem.  (The percentage of those who may become unstable is very small and in the words of Professor Stanley Zammit one of the authors of the critical overview published in the lancet and misquoted by the right wing press and other fascist types.“In conclusion we found that the evidence concerning mental illness and cannabis to be inconclusive”).They can become involved in harassment, intimidation and other offences. (Sounds more like alcohol users to me or perhaps police officers enforcing the cannabis laws in my experience.So as I understand it there a two types of laws  one were people can be kept terrorised in their home for matters of individual  choice over life style and one were you can outrage public decency by taking it up the rear in public and leaving your discarded filth all over the place and that’s ok. What hypocrisy!

Philip Walsh ● 6865d0 Comments ● 6865d

The Hounslow Chronicle Thursday 17th 2008

Two statements appear in this paper in two different articles and they show a strange attitude to upholding the law and public decency.In one on page 6 in an article concerning gay men having sex in public places such as Gunnersbury triangle (the local nature reserve visited by children) ch insp Andy Morgan insisted the practice was not a major issue in the borough and rarely provoked complaints it’s not a crime unless someone says it is. It usually happens late at night in secluded places and between consenting adults.Having spent time having to clear up the area of Osterley by Windmill lane also, used by the cottaging/ cruising/ dogging fraternity, I say it is. The whole area was full of rubbish old needles and discarded Durex. My children, now teenagers visited the Triangle many times as they grew up and many small children still do. The idea that this is not a problem is wrong, ask anyone doing community service about their experience of clearing up these sites if you doubt the seriousness of this problem.On page nine ch insp. Andy Morgan takes a different stance on a illegal practice also often carried out late at night between consenting adults only this time in the privacy of their own homes and with out turning public places into cess pits of discarded filth.I am talking about consuming cannabis. On this issue we get this rant from ch insp Mogan who believes downgrading cannabis has sent the wrong message to users and dealers. When Cannabis became declassified (it should have been but it wasn’t, it was downgraded) dealers thought the potential for them to be caught convicted and sentenced had been reduced, he said. (Why the penalties applicable under class B are the same as under Class C for these types of offences)It created an artificial belief we wouldn’t do much about people importing cannabis.Cannabis clearly leads to other crimes because there are big profits to be made (only because it’s illegal Andy)Also as people become unstable (after smoking the drug) they become more of a problem.  (The percentage of those who may become unstable is very small and in the words of Professor Stanley Zammit one of the authors of the critical overview published in the lancet and misquoted by the right wing press and other fascist types.“In conclusion we found that the evidence concerning mental illness and cannabis to be inconclusive”).They can become involved in harassment, intimidation and other offences. (Sounds more like alcohol users to me or perhaps police officers enforcing the cannabis laws in my experience).So as I understand it there a two types of laws  one were people can be kept terrorised in their home for matters of individual  choice over life style and one were you can outrage public decency by taking it up the rear in public and leaving your discarded filth all over the place and that’s ok. What hypocrisy!

Philip Walsh ● 6868d0 Comments ● 6868d