Forum Topics

Widening of the M4

Apparently the documents issued in connection with the Heathrow decision included a Highways England report on Surface Access Works :https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/562063/airports-commission-surface-access-works-strategic-road-network-proposals-validation-of-costs-and-delivery-assumptions.pdfWithin this is mention of widening the M4 between Junction 2 and 3 :Scope Definition of Proposed “M4 J2-3 Widening” and “M4 J4B Replacement”The scope of works proposed for widening of M4 J2-3 requires particular attention because of the elevated sections of the M4 immediately west of J2 and the high concentration of properties immediately adjacent to the highway boundaries over this section. Widening the M4 over this location is very challenging and it is highly probable that tunnelling would be required in the built-up areas to the west of M4 J2. There is a high level of inherent uncertainty in the scope of works required for widening of the M4 between junctions 2 and 3. Our assumed scope for the basis of our estimate is summarised below:M4 J2 to J3 - Road widening in both directionsoProvide one additional lane in each directionoWiden M4 Junction 3 eastbound merge and westbound off-slipoAdjust Motorway Service Area entry and exitsoRemove existing portal and cantilever gantriesoProvision of replacement sign and signal gantries complete with electronic and staticsignageoDemolish and replace three overbridgesoProvision of increased drainage capacityoRemove and replace lighting as requiredoReplace road restraint systemsoDemolish and replace one footbridgeoWidening of the M4 Junction 3 underbridge, three overbridges, one waterwaycrossing, one pedestrian underpass and one rail crossingoConvert the elevated viaduct/carriageway from junction 2 to westbound only travelfor approximately 3km to immediately west of the existing rail overbridgeoConstruct a driven 3 lane tunnel for eastbound traffic with the entry slot to the eastof the rail noted above and exiting in parkland to the north of Junction 2, ramping upto merge with the existing viaduct

Tim Henderson ● 3654d13 Comments ● 3632d

New Watermans Arts Centre Exhibition

Appalling, absolutely appalling.  Open developer profiteering in the extreme.Would have thought someone would have posted something on this site before now.  Was advised that 208 people went to the exhibition on Wednesday (from another source) and it was crowded today with people asking questions.  When I was approached if I had any questions, I said, "It's disgraceful, you need your heads looking at. I'm leaving and I have only been here 2 minutes", and promptly left. How the heck are they going to get the two, however many storey buildings, side by side onto the tiny width space here at the old Police Station! A space in between these 2 towers rising to 1/2 storeys is indicated which I assume will also encompass the ground floor/s of the 2 towers for the 500 seat theatre.  Unsure at the moment how many seats are currently at Watermans to make a comparison.On the existing Watermans site they want to put up an eight-storey block - the ground floor at a lower level than is existing at present alongside the river will house a café, etc., (I think - I didn't stay long enough to find out) with flats above.  A gigantic carbuncle on the riverside.  If anything should happen to this site afterwards it should become an extension of Watermans Park (a park) for the enjoyment of residents.  Don't forget also that a little outdoor café is planned for the marina development so why have another one in this new building?????Maybe I am wrong on this café! bit but just looking at the height of these buildings has put my hackles up.Its about time this Council and its Officers started thinking about its existing residents rather than cashing in on new.

Eileen Henderson ● 3645d29 Comments ● 3638d