Forum Topics

President Obama is the Problem and not the Solution

The Transocean Deepwater Horizon accident in the Gulf of Mexico has now become a very serious and complicated issue indeed.The exact causes of and responsibility for the disaster are not yet know so it is wrong of anyone, including particularly the President of the USA,  to leap to conclusions, prejudge the issue and prejudice any subsequent legal proceedings.Mr Obama as a graduate of the Harvard Law School should know this even though his practical legal experience is very limited. I am sure BP's lawyers are studying his statements with interest.Some of the statements made by BP's CEO Tony Hayward have been clumsy and insensitive but it needs to be borne in mind he is a geologist by profession and not a lawyer, politician or spin doctor. In retrospect it would have been better to let one of BP's senior US executives such as Lamar MacKay or Bob Dudley do the talking.BP has accepted its responsibilities and mobilised massive resources of people, vessels, equipment, material, knowledge and skill to deal with this very serious problem.The US Government or any other Government simply does not have the resources to deal with this. President Obama knows this, realises that he is impotent in this respect and instead of calming down and working with BP and others to solve the problem, has done what he knows best- mounted a highly political and chauvinist campaign against BP. As a consequence, millions of US, UK and other shareholders in BP and people whose pension funds have invested in BP have seen the value of their investment and pensions plummet. Tens of thousands of BP employees, contractors and suppliers fear for their jobs and the oil industry worldwide has been severely affected.I hope that David Cameron will have a word with Barack Obama this weekend and tell him to calm down and stop attacking BP and, by implication, Britain.

David Giles ● 5991d14 Comments ● 5975d

Better Use of the river for freight

I was surprised to see Sainsburys, Wandsworth mentioned below.Could there be hope for Morrison's Brentford or Tesco Bull's Bridge ?http://www.mhwmagazine.co.uk/LatestNews/Future_%27unsustainable%27_without_radical_change_says_Transport_for_London-6848.html"With 89% of all freight traffic being carried on London's roads and 23% of carbon emissions due to ground based transport, the case for moving more cargo on the River Thames has become imperative, according to Joseph Dack of Transport for London.Speaking at an inaugural Modal Shift conference held in London at The Chamber of Shipping by independent industry body Freight by Water, Mr. Dack was one of a series of high profile speakers from across the freight transport sector to issue a serious challenge to the industry to work together to deliver a viable alternative to traditional road haulage.Challenge to the freight industryBetter use of the river - the Blue Ribbon network - for freight transport is an important part of the Mayor's Transport Strategy," he said. "Currently we are breaching legislation with regard to air quality issues, whilst growing congestion is impacting on journey speeds and reliability of delivery times. Water freight is clearly recognised in London's transportation strategies, policies and plans, which provides a framework for 'modal shift'. However, we can't do this without the engagement of the industry and unless that happens, the future is unsustainable!"The challenge was welcomed by Peter Ward, Executive Director of Freight by Water, a not for profit membership organisation, supported by the Department of Transport and established to promote and facilitate modal shift. He described the River Thames Modal Shift forum, the first in a series of planned events across the UK, as a launch pad for change and a call to action to the water freight transport sector to deliver a tangible 'bundled' solution including a matrix of routes, times and services. Freight by Water will be facilitatorWard called on major retailers and manufacturers, as well as the leading logistics providers to play their part. "The role of Freight by Water is to set an agenda for change, identify the key drivers and recruit willing partners," he declared. "The case for shifting lorry loads of cargo from London's roads onto the river is made. The time for talking is over - now we must be prepared to actively develop a solution."Retail giant Sainsbury's, which has taken a strong lead in exploring possibilities of modal shift to water in London, and sister retailer Homebase both contributed to the event and offered strong support for the Freight by Water initiative. Kevin Greenaway, National Planning Manager at Sainsbury's, spoke of the challenges and complexities involved, but reiterated the company's firm commitment to add water to its portfolio of transport following the success of trials centred around its Wandsworth store.

Tim Henderson ● 5983d3 Comments ● 5982d

Dirty Hounslow

Thought this was very interesting especially in view of a very recent report before the local elections that gave Hounslow good marks for street cleanliness. At the time I did wonder what streets the inspectors had visited as the centre of Hounslow is invariably filthy and was just as awful last weekend. What with the unfinished roadworks (billed as improvements????) Hounslow Town centre is a tip.TOP 10 COUNCILS WITH THE DIRTIEST STREETS IN ENGLAND The % of relevant land and highways assessed as having deposits of detritus that fall below an acceptable level The % of relevant land and highways assessed as having deposits of litter that fall below an acceptable level England 12 5     Merton LB 49 21 Hounslow LB 44 15 North Hertfordshire DC 44 6 South Northamptonshire DC 43 7 Hertsmere DC 40 18 Bromley LB 36 24 Bradford MD 36 19 North Lincolnshire UA 36 14 Thurrock UA 35 23 Epsom & Ewell DC 35 6 Paul Kenny, GMB General Secretary speaking at Southport said, "There is an alarmingly high and dangerous level of dirty streets and pavements in far too many places. On average the 12% of streets that are officially classified as unacceptable is bad enough but there are 129 councils in England that have a higher proportion than that which is totally unacceptable.Local communities deserve clean and healthy environments. GMB know that clean streets are perfectly feasible everywhere, it's just a matter of ensuring there are enough properly trained and equipped street cleaners employed to do the job.Councillors should be clear that for street cleaning, as for other public services, you get what you pay for. The next thing that failed politicians may come out with is that people, as well as paying their council tax, should clean the streets themselves."* Detritus comprises dust, mud, soil, grit, gravel, stones, rotted leaf and vegetable residues, and fragments of twigs, glass, plastic and other finely divided materials. Detritus includes leaf and blossom falls when they have substantially lost their structure and have become mushy or fragmented. A significant and avoidable source of detritus is uncollected grass cuttings that have started to decompose.* Litter includes mainly synthetic materials, often associated with smoking, eating and drinking, that are improperly discarded and left by members of the public; or are spilt during waste management operations. Litter may also include putrescible or clinical wastes, or faeces such as dog, bird and other animal faeces.

Vanessa Smith ● 5993d7 Comments ● 5986d