An Apology and a reply to A Atkinson
I note your response to my posting in which I referred, incorrectly, to your performance in a Hounslow Council election. I accept that this did not occur and that you have never stood for the Council, and am happy to unreservedly apologise for any upset caused. I will, in future, check out "information" received from others in order to ensure that I do not make false statements again.In your posting you objected to me describing the content you produce as "bile and vomit". I do not accept this. Below are a few postings of yours, drawn at random, that demonstrate that this description is perfectly reasonable:-1) To George Anthony Burrell on 9th June 2003"Grow up you twat.........stop trying to be such a pratt, and go and give John Murphy a cuddle."2) To "Mr Ewew" (Your text)on 15th June 2008"Mr Ewew,Was you born an utter prick or did you have to work at it?"3) To Jamie Halliday on 15th July 2008"What bloody planet are you on.....Zog?"This is the language of a cyber bully, and your whimperings when others reply in kind underlines your bully boy approach.You repeatedly invite posters critical of your adverse remarks, usually levelled at ethnic minorities, to prove you are a racist. However, you know how to structure your remarks in order to avoid being identified as an overt racist. If you crossed the line your activities as a police volunteer would be terminated. For what it's worth, in a reply to Phil Andrews on 2nd March 2003 you stated:"There is an excuse for me. I'm an ingnorant (sic), narrow-minded, blinkered and prejudiced individual."Straight from the horse's mouth!In your response to me you choose to repeat the accusation that I was lying when I accused you of standing for the council. I have already acknowledged that I was in the wrong. I offer for readers' consideration 2 Atkinson lies posted on this site recently:-On the 17th July 2008 you said the following in a lengthy posting about planning in Hounslow"The nod and the wink culture was prevalent with this committee many years ago, especially the Central ward, one of its members on this planning committee built a structure without planning permission, and as I recall uprooted two trees in a conservation area in the process...........(H)e was never kicked off the committee."THIS IS LIE NUMBER 1You continue"a structure approx. 20ftx12ftx10ft.........ended up in the hands of a government inspector who upheld the enforcement.........but guess what, it's still there courtesy of fellow Labour councillors."LIE NUMBER 2In the first case the structure was built in Cranford. The member responsible was removed from the Planning Committee (of which he had been Vice-Chair), the structure was taken down and replacement trees planted. In the second case, the owner of the property, The Asian Food Centre on Staines Road, was able to prove the canopy had existed for more than 4 years and it was therefore immune from enforcement. I advised Mr Atkinson of this in an e-mail dated 12th December 2007, so there is no excuse for repeating the lie.Incidentally, wasn't it Joseph Goebbels who stated "if you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it people will eventually come to believe it"? History suggests that he, too, was an ignorant, narrow-minded, blinkered and prejudiced individual.
John Connelly ● 6632d23 Comments ● 6625d