Forum Topics

The Legg Inquiry- Reassessment of MP Past Allowances

I received a response today to my FOI request for information on the correspondence relating to "exceptional circumstances".http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/alan_keen_exceptional_circumstan?unfold=1" The House [ of Commons] considers that confirmation or denial of whether or not theinformation is held (and the provision of data where held) would beunfair as disclosure to the public generally would be likely to resultin trial by media. During Sir Thomas Legg's inquiry, it would beunfair on the MPs concerned to have to deal both with media speculationon such disclosures and with presenting their cases or points of view tothe inquiry and there is no guarantee that their representations inresponse to the media would be heard or published."I must admit that I had not registered that this Inquiry was happening and certainly hadn't heard of Sir Thomas Legg. Google also had relatively few references (and many were to another Inquiry into arms sales to Sierra Leone in 1998).Full information about the Inquiry appears in a Parliament Library briefing paper, "Reassessment of past ACA claims"http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/briefings/snpc-05123.pdfThe Independent apparently had an article a week ago including some of the ramifications of the Legg inquiry "MPs face the holiday from hell" :...Labour MPs warn that other MPs could go nuclear and force by-elections if they are humiliated by the Legg inquiry. "I wouldn't be surprised if more MPs charged with breaking the rules follow Ian Gibson after the summer recess," one said.Normally, MPs long for their drawn-out summer break. Many have mixed feelings about it this year. Contrary to popular belief, the majority take only two or three weeks' real holiday and spend the rest of their 12-week recess in their constituencies.Since the expenses controversy erupted in May, many have experienced a mixture of anger and coldness when visiting their seats. They don't expect public sympathy. But those whose claims did not create controversy are bitter at being tarred with the same brush as their colleagues who abused the system........http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/mps-face-the-holiday-from-hell-1754406.html

Tim Henderson ● 6310d1 Comments ● 6308d

Liberal  Democrats in action    Help required!

Young pretender Zac Goldsmith offers political advice to old-timer Vince Cable. (from the Evening Standard) Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. With London borough elections coming up in less than a year, I am astounded to see the LibDem leadership of Richmond Council repeat the exact same mistakes that lost them the borough in 2002. Back then, the shennanigans which surrounded a proposed redevelopment of Twickenham Riverside caused a swing which brought the Tories into power for the first time in decades. They, too, failed to appreciate the importance of local planning issues in local elections and were duly booted out in 2006. Now the LibDems are backing the wrong horse all over again - and on the same site. This time, though, the row is engulfing national politicians with Vince 'Saintly' Cable well in the frame. In a local referendum, conducted by Electoral Reform Services a few weeks ago, Twickenham residents overwhelmingly rejected council plans to sell a riverside site, which is home to a popular cafe, children's playground and a David Bellamy Award-winning garden, to controversial property developers. Council leader Serge Lourie alleged the referendum question was "rigged". Cable appears to have adopted this line, stating that "the phrasing is so obviously loaded". And he announced he would not to intervene on behalf of his constituents because "I represent Twickenham in Parliament, not on the council". This sophistry is not going down at all well among the voters, but it is helping Dave Cameron's green-eyed boy, Zac Goldsmith, the Tory candidate for the adjoining constituency of Richmond Park. "Local people have voted overwhelmingly against the proposals", he told me. "As a believer in democracy, for me that ought to be the end of it. Vince is missing a trick here, and risks losing credibility. I hope he comes to his senses." So do I, Zac. So do I.

John Todd ● 6309d3 Comments ● 6309d

South West Trains and London Overground Disruption this Weekend (25/26 July)

Due to engineering works, the following services will be disrupted on the weekend of 25-26 July 2009.South West Trains - Saturday 25 JulyThe lines between Barnes and Kew Bridge will be closed all day.■The “Hounslow Loop” train service will only run between London Waterloo and Kew Bridge via Richmond and Hounslow.■A replacement bus service will run between Barnes and Kew Bridge. Trains from Reading to London Waterloo will make extra stops at Barnes and Putney for connections. ■Trains between London Waterloo and Weybridge via Staines will be diverted between Barnes and Feltham, calling instead at Richmond, Twickenham and Whitton. ■A reduced train service will run between Kew Bridge and Hounslow. From late evening (about 2230) replacement bus services will run between Barnes and Hounslow. South West Trains - Sunday 26 July The lines between Barnes and Hounslow will be closed all day.■Trains between London Waterloo and Woking via Staines will be diverted between Barnes and Hounslow, calling instead at Richmond and Twickenham. ■A replacement bus service will run between Barnes and Hounslow, connecting at Hounslow with the altered Woking train service. ■Passengers use alternative train services between London Waterloo and Barnes to connect with the bus service.For more information:  www.southwesttrains.co.uk London Overground - Sunday 26 July The London Overground is suspended between Richmond and Stratford due to planned engineering works. Use the District line between Richmond and Gunnersbury. Replacement buses operate between Gunnersbury and Gospel Oak and between Hampstead Heath and Stratford.For more information, visit:  www.tfl.gov.uk

Chris Calvi-Freeman ● 6315d0 Comments ● 6315d

Highway Skip Licensing

Hello, my name is Alan Weaver. I am a Scrutiny Officer with London Borough of Hounslow. I can be contacted on 0208 583 2365 by telephone, 0208 583 2526 by fax, or at alan.weaver@hounslow.gov.uk by emailScrutiny members at the council are currently undertaking a review of the authority's highway skip licensing service. All skips on the highway should be licensed by the authority and only approved skip companies can apply for a licence. The skip licence obliges the applicant to ensure that the London Borough of Hounslow Policy for 'The Placement of Builders Skips on the Public Highway' is followed.  Scrutiny memebrs would like to get some rapid feedback over the next fortnight about how local residents view this issue and whether they consider this policy is followed - so the results can be fed into the review.  Thankyou for any comments you may have about this matter. The Policy is as follows:  1. Each skip shall be indelibly marked with the owner's name and telephone number. 2. Each skip shall not exceed 5 metres in length and 2 metres in width. 3. Any skip placed on the highway sahll have a current permit. 4. No skip on the public highway should obstruct access to premises unless the consent of the occupier of those premises has been obtained. 5. Each skip shall be depositied as staed above and shall be positioned so that its longer sides are parallel to the edge of the carriageway and as near to the edge of the carriageway as is reasonably practicable and so that it does not impede the surface water drainage of the highway nor obstruct access to any manhole or the apparatus of any statutory undertaker or the LB Hounslow.6. Each skip shall be placed at least 10 metres from any junction bend or corner.7. At night(that is to say between half hour after sunset and half hour before sunrise) a warning light shall be placed against or attached to each corner of the skip. Failure to attcah warning light shall result in a penalty charge being issued against the owner of the skip. 8. No skip when standing on a public highway, shall contain asbestos, inflammable, explosive, noxious or dangerous material orany material which is likely to putrefy or which otherwise is or is likely to become, a nuisance to users of the highway. 9. No skip shall be used in such a way that any of its contents fall onto the public highway, or that there is an escape of dust from the contents of the skip. 10. Each skip shall be removed for emptying as soon as practicable and in any case no later than two working days after it has been filled. 11. No skip shall remain on the highway pusuant to this permission after the period of the permit. 12. All materials placced in each skip shall be properly disposed of and the highway where the skip has been depositied shall be left in a clean and tidy condition on the expiration of this permission. 13. The London Borough of Hounslow may seek to rectify any skip that is not placed in accordance with the above schedule. In paerticulalr, this shall apply to the lighting of the skip and keeping the area clean, the company/owner depositing the skip shall be liable for any charges.     

Alan John Weaver ● 6386d130 Comments ● 6316d