Forum Topics

Breach of civil liberties?

Ealing and Hounslow are being rather cagey about the use of cameras in residential streets.These are not cameras to deal with crime hotspots or illegal fly tipping.These are cameras that have a capability of recognition of people and their property.In Ealing, parking registration - even for stop and shop is coupled by use of data being compiled and then the owner of that data being tracked by cameras recording their movements.With no opt out for the T&Cs of this. Everyone who disclosed bank details or any other personal details is agreeing to be a component of Data gathering.  To a third party/ The Local council, who?Ealing won't say, but use a slippery get out clause about your data is deleted after use.  But it is vague as to what that actually means and if it is then one would be re-registering each time.Ealing are also utilising School Streets cameras out of enforcement hours for this and again, will not respond to any enquiries. There is nothing to protect being part of a data ingress by criminal activity - as has happened with TfL, several London Boroughs and even M&S.In Brentford, a series of spy cameras have virtually ghettoised the Griffin Park area.The notice is too vague.What rights to residents have about their image or their car being recorded?Who and exactly what is the purpose ?Try enquiring and then enquiring again? The responses are very minimal and evasive.Not obliged to divulge commercial interests or partners. So who asked permission of the commercial partners of LBH ? That is the Council Tax paying residents and citizens of this Borough.Even if this is the most innocent of things, residents should have the right to see exactly what footage is being recorded and fully know the context of why it is being recorded.Once its done, there are copies, back ups and all, whatever the disclaimer might be.So does anyone else really know what this is all about?

Raymond Havelock ● 47d6 Comments ● 43d

I beg to differ.

Reference this item in Guy Lambert's weekly blog - below.I've just spent months trying to get an 3 bed council house where I live finally let, because I was so outraged that this is allowed to happen. I was in constant contact with a ward councillor, and the various tales he got from housing and gave to me really did beggar belief. The house finally has been let, but it was empty for a YEAR and a bigger load of old garbage offered as ongoing and ever changing excuses for their outrageous tardiness by the housing dept. were worthy of a Pullitzer Prize! There is also another 3 bed property here, also empty for over a year, so what the bloody hell is going on? Guy maintains we need ever more flats built, but I'd like to know why the council doesn't use the powers it has Under the Empty Dwelling Management Order (EDMO) legislation to bring into use abandoned private properties, where an owner cannot be located? I did ask ages ago and got told it's all too complicated - well it's a damned site more complicated to be stuck in a room with a couple of small children  with no sense coming out of Hounslow council. We all know there is a terrible shortage of really affordable housing, and surely that means every, effort with all the powers at their disposal should be used by local authorities? Or am I missing something?"Nobody turned up for the surgery but a man who I had invited had explained he could not attend: he has been put into a B&B in Hayes following a no-fault eviction by a private landlord. He is in a single room with one bed with two daughters, at least one of which is a toddler. meanwhile his wife is in West Middlesex with some illness that means she is retained there. He is pretty desperate, trying to survive in a single room with 3 people, bringing his daughter somehow to nursery in Brentford. I tried to reassure him: the housing people have to find places for many people with similar problems with no flats available. People think they are unhelpful but in my experience they are determined to help as fast as they can. and their record with 'my' homeless people has been resolved fairly soon. I asked him to try and be calm and come back to me at the end of this week if nothing has happened."

Vanessa Smith ● 74d5 Comments ● 62d

Pull the other one!

Just seen this on the front of both this Forum and also ChsiwickW4, I know I am a cynic but this really does beggar belief! What next? Father Christmas really exists? Muppets.Hounslow Council Leader 'Unaware' of Colleague's Legal DifficultiesShantanu Rajawat says he first learned of Hina Mir case through press reportsCllr Shantanu Rajawat (left) and Cllr Hina Mir (right)ChiswickW4.com and BrentfordTW8.comDecember 22, 2025Hounslow Council’s leader has claimed he had no idea that one of his senior councillors had been found to employ an illegal worker earlier this year.In January, a civil court ruled against Councillor Hina Mir, a now-suspended Labour Party member, for employing a woman as a nanny in her home, who was not permitted to work in the UK. She also paid the illegal worker below minimum wage.Cllr Mir, who represents Feltham West, was fined £40,000, and in early December failed in her attempt to have this fine overturned, which brought to light the previous ruling. A source close to Hounslow Labour claims that the Council Leader, Cllr Shantanu Rajawat, and other senior members knew about the case. However, this is something vehemently denied by Cllr Rajawat.Since the hearing, several media outlets have reported on the ruling, however Cllr Rajawat insists it was not until the reporting that he, or anyone else in Hounslow Labour, became aware of the ruling initially made in January. The LDRS asked how it was possible that he and the entire Labour group were unaware at a time when journalists were aware.He said, “I don’t necessarily have an answer for that, except to say once we know about something like that happening, we will take action or the [Labour] party will take action. We’re a large group.“And there is a number of people there, so we rely on people self-referring. With the best will in the world, as much as I’d love to sit there and search through court papers and stuff, it’s just not possible for us to do.”Cllr Mir was suspended by the Labour Party on 9 December, following the ruling made at the City of London County Court that the fine would not be overturned. However, she remains a serving councillor and is still Chair of the Housing and Environment Scrutiny Panel. She has not been convicted of a criminal offence in relation to the issue.Cllr Rajawat was asked why it is that Cllr Farhaan Rehman was effectively forced to resign his chairmanship of the Licensing Committee after it emerged that he parked a Lamborghini in a disabled bay without a blue badge, yet Cllr Mir retains her committee role which gives her an additional £7,089 a year as a special responsibility allowance.Cllr Mir was also found to have parked in a disabled bay without a blue badge just days after the LDRS revealed Cllr Rehman had done the same. According to Cllr Rajawat, it is for technical reasons that she has not been compelled to resign her role as Chair.“There is a subtle difference between Cllr Rehman’s position and Cllr [Mir’s] position, and it is more a technicality than anything else in so far as Cllr Rehman was appointed by me as Chair of Licensing whereas Hina is elected by council – scrutiny is completely independent of the executive.”Cllr Mir has not issued a public apology for parking in a disabled bay, whereas Cllr Rehman did. Cllr Rehman also made a voluntary £160 donation to charity.Cllr Rajawat says Cllr Mir is also going to make a £160 donation to charity. In Hounslow, parking in a disabled bay without a blue badge usually triggers a £160 fine for members of the public.A Hounslow Labour spokesperson previously confirmed it had suspended Cllr Mir, adding, “We do not comment on any internal investigations.”Cllr Mir said in response, “I would like to confirm my KC and legal team is [sic] dealing with this matter and we are challenging the decision on civil penalty at county court.“I hope you will understand that there is a lot of misinformation on media, I have dedicated many years of my life in serving others in different ways i.e. food bank, supporting charities locally, nationally and internationally or by giving time at local Citizen’s Advice Bureau and church to support residents, I would love to carry on supporting others with respect and dignity. I remain fully committed to my role and responsibilities in serving the residents of Hounslow.” Philip James Lynch - Local Democracy Reporter

Vanessa Smith ● 121d1 Comments ● 120d

Ten more years of Gunnersbury Park Events

FYI. This just got picked up by a colleague.This is for 10 years of events but so far details are sketchy as we could not access the detail online. So fyi for those who may be affectedDate: 27/11/2025                                                        Ref: P/2025/3274Dear Owner/OccupierTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990PLANNING (LISTED BUILDING AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990Site: Gunnersbury Park, Popes Lane, Ealing, W3 8LQProposal: Temporary change of use of areas of Gunnersbury Park for the staging of temporary eventsbetween May 2026 and May 2036. Up to 28 live event days per calendar year, exclusive of 90 days of set-up, inactive and removal days. Including the erection of associated temporary structures, fencing, ancillaryconcessions and facilities.There has been an application for planning permission to carry out the development described above. We invite you tocomment on the proposal before we make a decision. If you wish to comment:You can go to     https://www.hounslow.gov.uk/planning-building.   for details of the application and to follow its progress. You then enter the reference number  P/2025/3274 To give your views please do so in writing within 21 days of the date of this letter using the ‘comment’ option onthe summary page for the application. If the consultation period includes a bank holiday, the bank holiday days willbe added to the 21 days. If we receive comments after this date we will still take them into account if we have not madea decision. We will not consider objections made on previous applications.If you would like more information about the application, you can find the case officer’s details on the summaryIf you want to comment, please consider the following advice on what are relevant PLANNING considerations that theCouncil can take into account in deciding whether to grant or refuse planning permission:1. A planning application must be evaluated against Council planning policies, set out in the Local Plan (see.       https://www.hounslow.gov.uk/planning-building     2. The Council also has other adopted guidelines against which planning applications might be judged, such asguidelines on House Extensions. You can find these at: https://www.hounslow.gov.uk/planning-building

Raymond Havelock ● 146d14 Comments ● 131d