Forum Topics

Pull the other one!

Just seen this on the front of both this Forum and also ChsiwickW4, I know I am a cynic but this really does beggar belief! What next? Father Christmas really exists? Muppets.Hounslow Council Leader 'Unaware' of Colleague's Legal DifficultiesShantanu Rajawat says he first learned of Hina Mir case through press reportsCllr Shantanu Rajawat (left) and Cllr Hina Mir (right)ChiswickW4.com and BrentfordTW8.comDecember 22, 2025Hounslow Council’s leader has claimed he had no idea that one of his senior councillors had been found to employ an illegal worker earlier this year.In January, a civil court ruled against Councillor Hina Mir, a now-suspended Labour Party member, for employing a woman as a nanny in her home, who was not permitted to work in the UK. She also paid the illegal worker below minimum wage.Cllr Mir, who represents Feltham West, was fined £40,000, and in early December failed in her attempt to have this fine overturned, which brought to light the previous ruling. A source close to Hounslow Labour claims that the Council Leader, Cllr Shantanu Rajawat, and other senior members knew about the case. However, this is something vehemently denied by Cllr Rajawat.Since the hearing, several media outlets have reported on the ruling, however Cllr Rajawat insists it was not until the reporting that he, or anyone else in Hounslow Labour, became aware of the ruling initially made in January. The LDRS asked how it was possible that he and the entire Labour group were unaware at a time when journalists were aware.He said, “I don’t necessarily have an answer for that, except to say once we know about something like that happening, we will take action or the [Labour] party will take action. We’re a large group.“And there is a number of people there, so we rely on people self-referring. With the best will in the world, as much as I’d love to sit there and search through court papers and stuff, it’s just not possible for us to do.”Cllr Mir was suspended by the Labour Party on 9 December, following the ruling made at the City of London County Court that the fine would not be overturned. However, she remains a serving councillor and is still Chair of the Housing and Environment Scrutiny Panel. She has not been convicted of a criminal offence in relation to the issue.Cllr Rajawat was asked why it is that Cllr Farhaan Rehman was effectively forced to resign his chairmanship of the Licensing Committee after it emerged that he parked a Lamborghini in a disabled bay without a blue badge, yet Cllr Mir retains her committee role which gives her an additional £7,089 a year as a special responsibility allowance.Cllr Mir was also found to have parked in a disabled bay without a blue badge just days after the LDRS revealed Cllr Rehman had done the same. According to Cllr Rajawat, it is for technical reasons that she has not been compelled to resign her role as Chair.“There is a subtle difference between Cllr Rehman’s position and Cllr [Mir’s] position, and it is more a technicality than anything else in so far as Cllr Rehman was appointed by me as Chair of Licensing whereas Hina is elected by council – scrutiny is completely independent of the executive.”Cllr Mir has not issued a public apology for parking in a disabled bay, whereas Cllr Rehman did. Cllr Rehman also made a voluntary £160 donation to charity.Cllr Rajawat says Cllr Mir is also going to make a £160 donation to charity. In Hounslow, parking in a disabled bay without a blue badge usually triggers a £160 fine for members of the public.A Hounslow Labour spokesperson previously confirmed it had suspended Cllr Mir, adding, “We do not comment on any internal investigations.”Cllr Mir said in response, “I would like to confirm my KC and legal team is [sic] dealing with this matter and we are challenging the decision on civil penalty at county court.“I hope you will understand that there is a lot of misinformation on media, I have dedicated many years of my life in serving others in different ways i.e. food bank, supporting charities locally, nationally and internationally or by giving time at local Citizen’s Advice Bureau and church to support residents, I would love to carry on supporting others with respect and dignity. I remain fully committed to my role and responsibilities in serving the residents of Hounslow.” Philip James Lynch - Local Democracy Reporter

Vanessa Smith ● 131d1 Comments ● 130d

Ten more years of Gunnersbury Park Events

FYI. This just got picked up by a colleague.This is for 10 years of events but so far details are sketchy as we could not access the detail online. So fyi for those who may be affectedDate: 27/11/2025                                                        Ref: P/2025/3274Dear Owner/OccupierTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990PLANNING (LISTED BUILDING AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990Site: Gunnersbury Park, Popes Lane, Ealing, W3 8LQProposal: Temporary change of use of areas of Gunnersbury Park for the staging of temporary eventsbetween May 2026 and May 2036. Up to 28 live event days per calendar year, exclusive of 90 days of set-up, inactive and removal days. Including the erection of associated temporary structures, fencing, ancillaryconcessions and facilities.There has been an application for planning permission to carry out the development described above. We invite you tocomment on the proposal before we make a decision. If you wish to comment:You can go to     https://www.hounslow.gov.uk/planning-building.   for details of the application and to follow its progress. You then enter the reference number  P/2025/3274 To give your views please do so in writing within 21 days of the date of this letter using the ‘comment’ option onthe summary page for the application. If the consultation period includes a bank holiday, the bank holiday days willbe added to the 21 days. If we receive comments after this date we will still take them into account if we have not madea decision. We will not consider objections made on previous applications.If you would like more information about the application, you can find the case officer’s details on the summaryIf you want to comment, please consider the following advice on what are relevant PLANNING considerations that theCouncil can take into account in deciding whether to grant or refuse planning permission:1. A planning application must be evaluated against Council planning policies, set out in the Local Plan (see.       https://www.hounslow.gov.uk/planning-building     2. The Council also has other adopted guidelines against which planning applications might be judged, such asguidelines on House Extensions. You can find these at: https://www.hounslow.gov.uk/planning-building

Raymond Havelock ● 156d14 Comments ● 141d

Share Your Views on Brentford High Street Regeneration!

Hi everyone!I hope you’re all doing well! I’m working on my A-Level Geography project about the social and economic impacts of urban regeneration in Brentford High Street and I’d really appreciate your help.I had set up a Google Form for the survey, but sadly the link isn’t working at the moment. To make it easy for you to participate, I’ve added all the questions directly below.The survey is completely anonymous, voluntary and only takes 5–10 minutes. Your thoughts and experiences will really help me understand how the area has changed over time, from housing and shops to community life and the environment.I’d be super grateful for your input—it would really make a difference to my project! Thank you so much for taking the time to share your experiences 🙏💛Brentford High Street Regeneration Questionnaire:Age group (optional): Under 18 / 18–30 / 31–50 / 51–70 / 70+Gender (optional): Male/Female/Non-binary/Prefer not to sayHow long have you lived here?* 0-2 yrs/3-5 yrs/6-10 yrs/11-20 yrs/20 + yrsHow would you rate the following since regeneration?*1 = Very Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent- Housing Affordability- Local services (schools, healthcare, shops)- Transport links- Safety/crime levels- Social/community feel (local festivals, neighbourhood groups, charity events)- Environment (green spaces, litter)- Job opportunities- Accessibility for people with disabilities (wheelchair ramps, accessible public transport, step-free access)Which types of buildings, spaces or facilities have changed the most in Brentford since regeneration? (By 'changed we mean new or renovated buildings, areas now used for something different or public spaces that have been improved/added). - Residential (houses, flats)- Commercial/shops (retail stores, restaurants, cafes)- Offices/workspaces- Green/public spaces (parks, playgrounds)- Cultural/leisure facilities (community centers, sports halls, museums)- Other:To what extent do you agree with the following statements?*1 = Very Poor 2 3 4 5 = Excellent- Regeneration has improved the local environment.- Regeneration has affected the affordability of living in Brentford.- I feel connected to my community.How have housing prices changed in Brentford since regeneration?  *1 = Much cheaper 2 3 4 5 = Much more expensiveHow have prices of everyday products in local shops changed?*1 = Much cheaper 2 3 4 5 = Much more expensiveDo you feel connected to your community?*1 = Not at all 2 3 4 5 = Very connectedDo you think Brentford is a better place to live now than it was 5 years ago?* Yes/No/Not sureWho do you think Brentford is now more suited to?*- Families- Professionals- Tourists- Long-term locals- Other:Has regeneration made you feel more or less at home here?☐ More / ☐ Less / ☐ No difference – why?*What aspects of regeneration do you like or appreciate the most?*What concerns or challenges has regeneration brought to your daily life?*If you could change one thing about the regeneration in Brentford, what would it be and why?*

Fatima Ali ● 242d9 Comments ● 237d

Floating bus stops not such a great idea after all

From Highways Magazine:The roll-out of floating bus stops has been halted by the Government as it responds to campaigns surrounding pedestrian safety.The Government has ordered an immediate suspension of bus stops where pedestrians board and disembark directly from or to a cycle lane.The pause was announced by Simon Lightwood, the local transport minister, in a statement to MPs on 26 June, with the minister referring to them as ‘problematic’ to people with visual impairments.The main concern highlighted by campaigners is that the floating stops force pedestrians – particularly vulnerable pedestrians or those with disabilities – to avoid cyclists using the bike lanes between the stops and the pavement.A UCL study commissioned by the charity The Guide Dogs for the Blind Association showed that guide dogs avoid using floating bus stops due to meeting cyclists travelling at speed.El Briggs, head of policy, public affairs and campaigns at The Guide Dogs for the Blind Association, said: ‘Our research has shown the significant fear, anxiety and distress caused by bus stop boarders for disabled people.‘Our research shows bus stop boarders are confusing, difficult to detect, and can create frightening near-misses with cyclists. No one should have to risk stepping into harm’s way just to board or leave a bus.’Sarah Gayton, of the National Federation of the Blind UK, also commented: ‘All types of floating bus stops are not safe or accessible for blind people, as well as all bus passengers.‘Guidance will not resolve this design flaw. The only solution is for the bus to pull up to the pavement curb where passengers can board and alight without crossing any cycle lane.‘We want cyclists to be safe, but not at the expense of the most vulnerable people; pedestrians, but particularly blind and disabled pedestrians.’

Simon Hayes ● 296d52 Comments ● 248d

Guy's blog Glyphosate

Guy when you say "has fairly clear evidence of hurting insects and less clear evidence it may be carcinogenic." What evidence?When making the decision to ban Glyphosate, why did you believe the alternatives suggested would work? How was it a surprise that they didn't. Any competent, knowledgeable gardener could have told you they wouldn't.Acid formulas and hot foam or steam are "mechanical" systems for removing weeds. They kill the top growth of plants by burning them. Glyphosate is  "systemic". It is absorbed into the plant and down into the roots, it stops cell reproduction, so as old cells die new ones aren't produced and the plant dies.Burning the top of the plant away will only kill plants with a weak root structure that doesn't store energy; annuals and recently developed perennial and trees. Perennials have evolved to store energy in their  roots. They die back in winter and then re grow in spring, so can recover from having their leaves burned off. Trees, once they have put on some growth, will recover from having leaves burned. This is well known so the most basic enquiries would have enabled you to understand that.We are going through a period of rejecting science. The anti vax movement being another example. I don't believe you have any evidence that Glyphosate harms insects any more than you had evidence that alternative methods of killing weeds would work.That people reject science in favour of what people who are not scientists say is regrettable, but you were a Council Cabinet member making a decision that has cost, I believe, in excess of £1 million in revenue, made pavements unsafe and left an expensive legacy of capital repairs needed to fix roads and pavements damaged by roots and being stabbed at with hoes.As a Local Authority you have a public body, The Health & Safety Executive (HSE) to advise you on managing risks. The HSE says that Glyphosate is safe for people and the environment.  In rejecting your own advisers advice you have cost the Council a huge amount of money. You have helped spread disinformation causing concern in the public by repeating assertions that have no basis, just like the anti vax movement. How do yo justify that?

Kathleen Healy ● 271d36 Comments ● 259d

St Paul’s Green - teenagers in the playground

Coming back from coffee and the shops, I saw around half a dozen teenaged boys (in school uniform, but sadly no identifiable blazer badges) playing very roughly on the zip wire in the children’s playground on the green. They were all well into their teens, voices broken, tall and (a couple of them) quite hefty. They were so rough that I feared they were going to break the equipment. Heart pounding, I decided to go for it and asked - nicely - if they would please be careful, as the playground was for little kids. Of course, there was a load of lip in return, including: ‘This is a public park’. Yes, It’s a public park, but the playground isn’t. You want public, go and play on the grass. Some tedious back and forth ensued. I used some choice language and walked off, only stopping to have a look at the Rules & Regs board by the gate, which stated that the playground was for under 11s. I pointed at the sign and one of them shouted ‘I’m blind’ - I shouted back that he was… well, something else more, ahem, ‘fundamental’, if you get my drift. (I’d like to point out that I do not merely spew filth - I enunciate clearly, like an effing lady.)As a child, I was always frightened of the older children when I went to the swings. (By older, I mean 9 or 10, not 15 or 16.) Perhaps I was oversensitive, but seeing older children roughhousing filled me with terror. I’m sure I wasn’t alone in that at the time or - indeed - now. It’s intimidating, makes the atmosphere horrible for children and parents and knackers the playground equipment. I don’t know I what - if anything - can be done. There’s obviously no funding for a full-time park keeper. Even if there were one, I don’t think that teenagers would take any notice of them. When I was little, park keepers were scary authority figures; now, they’re probably as intimidated as the rest of us. My poor husband is sure that I’m going to end up knifed, but I feel that sometimes you do have to call out this sort of thing. It may not be the hottest anti-social behaviour ticket, but it’s really not acceptable. Or am I just yelling into the abyss?

Tracie Dudley Craig ● 323d8 Comments ● 287d