Forum Topics

Swyncombe Ave now a political toy.

So now it's political  Football time with featured teams playing at swyncome Ave Stadium of enlightenment.If the statement released is not an April 1st wheeze then it's a shame it would be a winner!But it is incredulous that its flawed in basic detailSwyncombe Ave is a wide straight road. Built with strengthened Sewers for heavier traffic to allow for those lanes and older roads that do not. Windmill Road and Northfields Ave being examples nearby.Swyncome does not have a CPZ. Why/ Because it cannot be profited from.Almost every property has garaging and off street parking. It is stuffed up with Traffic at  times because Windmill Road, Northfields Ave and South Ealing Road cannot cope with the increase in HGVs and general local traffic.At other times it's much the same as it's always been.Swyncombe Ave residents will also be stuck in the ensuing chaos just to reach their personal checkpoint charlie.No one will gain.South Ealing Road has been a no go zone for local traffic for nearly 24 months. and badly for the last 12.Lower Boston Road is now chaotic for most of the day even weekends and during the lockdown at it's peak.The fallout goes a long way. Swyncombe ave is a wide straight link road with ample off street parking. Windmill Road, Boston Manor road and all the other local roads cannot claim that luxury.This is messing about with a scheme that is completely flawed in every aspect.The losers in this are all those who rely on transportation to make a living, help others and balance time with work.Not everyone works in an environment where it's easy to rock up stinking of sweat and have a macbook and a perch as a workplace.

Raymond Havelock ● 1592d7 Comments ● 1584d

Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club and the Sports Hub

We are delighted to see that the Sports Hub is now open. The Bowls Club wishes every success for this enterprise.For the Bowls Club, the photograph in the article is particularly poignant in that it features the bowls pavilion and bowls green. The statements from officers of LB Hounslow and LB Ealing talk of delivering "important community, sports and leisure facilities for residents in the local area" and a vision for Gunnersbury Park "where local people can enjoy sport, beautiful green spaces and a rich local history long into the future.."Meanwhile, bowling in Gunnersbury Park is facing extinction after a history of 90 years. The Community Interest Company is bent on ensuring this fate through a policy of intentional neglect.Members and supporters of the Bowls Club have repeatedly been refused access to the site to carry out extremely urgent maintenance to the green. We learned yesterday that an expert and fully accredited third party has also been refused access by the CIC. This party had very kindly offered to carry out maintenance on behalf of the Bowls Club.The planning application from Putt in the Park has yet to be determined by Hounslow Planning Committee. We believe that by the time this decision is made, whether it is to refuse or to permit, the bowls green will be beyond repair.You may, as does the Bowls Club, wonder how it has been possible to arrive at this situation in what is, after all, a public park which was conceived to be for the benefit of the entire community.

Jim Storrar ● 1585d0 Comments ● 1585d

Spot the difference

From last week's councillor's blog.'The meeting about Boston Manor Park was lively, much as I expected. As a non-expert, I figure that if our own council parks people, Heritage Lottery, Historic England, landscape architects, professional ecologists come up with a plan after a lot of consultation, it won’t be far wrong but this is not always how people see it. I’ve worked quite hard over the years to try and improve engagement between the bevy of experts and local people who often have a different perspective and deserve to be heard.It’s apparent that there’s a disconnect in BMP, but I’m hoping the increased public engagement (and reacting to public views where appropriate) plus the park looking better as spring growth revives it, will help bring about a meeting of minds. Of course, not everyone will be satisfied, but I’m getting a few quiet appreciations of the changes amongst many protests.'Then read the article on this week's front page from Chris Longhurst re the future of Boston Manor Park.There appears to be a bit more than a 'disconnect' where this issue is concerned, and I fear Hounslow have a lot to learn and have given up listening or even caring what park users, residents and the stalwarts of the Friends group think.At the same time as this appalling state of affairs rumbles on, Hounslow are pushing the idea of 'Environmental Champions', we are told that they want people to get involved with various ideas in their communities to improve the environment - such as litter picks and wildflower meadows and tree planting, all laudable aims. However, there exists a network of volunteer groups already doing these things - a lot of them are local Friends groups, so the question is why not work with what you have and bring these ideas together? Why keep re-inventing the wheel. Of course any criticism brings forth accusations of 'dissing' the council or 'holding a grudge'. To say a number of people are fed-up with this attitude that does not allow for any independence of thought and has to be run by Hounslow, who of course have a shortage of staff which means many people spending hours trying to contact the living via e-mail, this is exacerbated by Covid - which is now the 'go to' excuse for all and sundry.Whether Hounslow want to admit it or not - they have dropped a real clanger where Boston Manor is concerned, and there are many of us who are absolutely fed-up to the back teeth with this heavy handed way of doing things. 'Disconnect'? that's putting it mildly.

Vanessa Smith ● 1592d2 Comments ● 1592d

1% disgrace.

This is what a dear friend of mine thinks about the government's pay offer to NHS staff.Yesterday, the final blow was dealt. A proposed 1% pay rise for NHS staff, whilst others, outside the NHS, are proposing to vote themselves increases above 1%. This is an absolute disgrace. For the past ten years, pay and conditions in the NHS have been ransacked. Pay frozen, public pensions attacked. Remember the coalition government, who managed to convince the public that NHS staff all had gold plated pensions?  Who stood up to oppose those changes and support the NHS ? Who has stood up and challenged the huge management costs in the NHS ? Layers and layers of management posts, directors, non executive directors, trust chairmen, plus all the others in every NHS hospital. Some junior managers, with few or no qualifications, no direct contact with patients but many paid the same or more than a Ward or ITU Sister with  professional degrees. What has happened over the past year? The doctors, nurses, health care assistants, frontline admin staff, porters and cleaners, left to basically run the hospitals, whilst most of the management have worked from home. Imagine the nursing staff, having to deal with several deaths per shift, being the last person to hold someone's relatives hand as they die? The sheer stress each hour of each 12 or 13 hour shift, worked with no breaks. Exhausted, emotionally and physically. Who stood up and challenged the 44.000 nursing vacancies? Well I can hold my hand up and say that I have, especially in the last ten years of my 47 year career as a nurse. I retired 2 years ago, fed up with no one listening to us, targets above patient care, plus many many other issues. The time has come to stand up and demand a complete overhaul of the structures in our NHS. Bring back the outsourced staff, porters and cleaners in house, so that their pay and conditions can be improved. Yes the NHS requires managers but not in the numbers, we currently have. Savings made can be redirected to frontline staff. Who is actually going to stand up and challenge all of the above? A golden opportunity for the Labour Party and others to step up to the plate.

Vanessa Smith ● 1626d3 Comments ● 1609d

Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club - Petition

The Gunnersbury Park Community Interest Company has refused to grant access by the Bowls Club to the bowls green to carry out urgent maintenance work.Some readers may wish to sign this petition:https://petitions.hounslow.gov.uk/GPBowlsClub/Our request is that all councillors, whether members of the Planning Committee or not, should seek to use their good offices to persuade the CIC to allow the Bowls Club access to the bowls green.Gunnersbury Estate (2026) Community Interest Company (the CIC) is responsible for the management of Gunnersbury Park on behalf of the joint owners, the London Boroughs of Hounslow and Ealing.In April 2020 a planning application was refused for the conversion of the bowls clubhouse to a cafe/restaurant. In January 2021, a decision on a further, almost identical, planning application was deferred by Hounslow Planning Committee. This proposal would lead to the re-purposing of the bowls green as a mini-golf facility which would mean the end of bowls in Gunnersbury Park after 90 years.In deferring their decision, the Planning Committee wished to have more time to consider all of the relevant facts, including the consideration of alternative sites for the mini-golf facility.The Bowls Club and volunteers from the wider community have been refused access by the CIC to carry out urgent maintenance work. Without this work the bowls green will rapidly deteriorate to a condition beyond repair and this will mean that the Planning Committee will be faced with a situation where bowls is no longer a viable use for the site of the bowls green.The Bowls Club is not opposed to the establishment of a mini-golf facility in the Park. Indeed, it supports the principle of this important source of revenue for the CIC but not at the expense of

Jim Storrar ● 1626d13 Comments ● 1609d

DISHONEST TRADING.

Misleading information provided by energy switching company Look After My Bills to the public has been addressed by the Advertising Standards Authority. Below is a post shared by Nick Blagg, a member of:                                                                                                                                                                        "Look After My Bills Problem Reporting Page."                                                                                                                                                     Nick Blagg shared a link.The complaint made to the advertising standards agency against LAMB has been upheld !! It feels like a partial victory to me based on what the ruling is (see below) but it’s still a win and the more of us that continue to complain the more pressure is applied.  Keep it up guys. 👍🏻Dear Mr Blagg,Thank you for your continued patience.  Further to the below, we received another complaint which raised issues similar to those highlighted in your complaint.  Based on the information you and the other complainant provided, we considered that advertising content from Look After My Bills was likely to break the advertising rules we apply.  Therefore, we contacted the advertiser to ask for their assurance that future ads do not misleadingly imply that users of the service will have access to every single energy company and every single energy deal on the market.  They have provided this assurance.This now resolves your complaint, and the case will be closed.  Basic information including the advertiser’s name and where the ad appeared will be published on www.asa.org.ukThank you for bringing this matter to our attention.Kind regards,JamesJames JonesComplaints ExecutiveDirect Line 020 7492 2214Please note, I do not work on FridaysAdvertising Standards AuthorityCastle House, 37-45 Paul StreetLondon EC2A 4LSTelephone 020 7492 2222

Neil Milkins ● 1616d0 Comments ● 1616d

It's another world!

SENSITIVE AS THOUSANDS LOSE JOBS AND BUSINESSES GO BUST. A working group of Borough councillors is due to report shortly on remuneration for councillors. Should it increase and, if so, by how much? Currently, Council leader Steve Curran receives £42,332 per year. This compares with neighbouring leaders' pay – £41,808 in Ealing (Labour), and £65,947 in Hillingdon (Conservative). In 2018 a report, The Remuneration of Councillors in London, recommended £68,130. It said: "This is a full-time job, involving a high level of responsibility and includes the exercise of executive responsibilities. It is right that it should be remunerated on a basis which compares with similar positions in the public sector, while still retaining a reflection of the voluntary character of public service."The Working Group's recommendations are expected to be presented at the Council's next meeting, 30 March.The last increase in Hounslow councillors' allowances was in 2018. They all receive a basic £11,045 pa. There are then Special Responsibility Allowances for committee and other work. Deputy leader Cllr Lily Bath currently receives £29,586. Other Cabinet members receive £25,508. The 2018 report recommended these figures should be between £47,962 and £54,505.The 2018 report said: "It is important that, as far as reasonably possible, financial loss does not prevent people from becoming councillors. Allowances are not shown by polls to be something which influences councillors to take on the role, though they are instrumental in making it possible for some people to do so. Allowances should be set at a level that enables people to undertake the role of councillor, while not acting as an incentive to do so. If it is important that there are no financial incentives to being a councillor, it is equally important that there should not be a financial disincentive. It is clearly desirable that service as a councillor is not confined to those with independent means."

Vanessa Smith ● 1641d21 Comments ● 1621d

With friends like these......

How sad and disheartening to read of the situation that the Friends of Boston Manor find themselves in, unfortunately it is not an uncommon experience among groups like them. This group of people work their socks off, and have done for years only for the council to sweep in and undo all the hard work and committment. The whole idea is that the council and the Friends groups work together, unfortunately Hounslow seem to be control freaks and think they know best with their grandiose schemes and so-called 'consultations'.If we have learned anything over the last dreadful year, it is that volunteering and working together has been of great benefit to communities all over the country. Our parks and open spaces have come into their own as valuable and valued assets. To see a group of volunteers who have raised a lot of money and thrown themselves into making Boston Manor what it was feeling so let down they feel they have no option other than to walk away is appalling, heads in Hounslow should truly be hanging in shame. And before anyone starts shouting 'Covid' this was the situation for many of us prior to the pandemic. There are many Friends groups around this borough who possibly feel the same at times, dealing with Hounslow is not an easy task. E-mails go unanswered, communication is dire and you are left in limbo.But then looking at our elected members and their performance this week is it really any surprise?

Vanessa Smith ● 1626d0 Comments ● 1626d

Fresh attempt to develop Syon Park Allotments

I don't know how many people are aware, but there is another attempt to develop the Park Road allotments opposite Syon Park Gates by the Duke's Northumberland Estates. The proposal is to build 80 duplexes and flats on about two thirds of the allotments that has been green fields for centuries and allotments for over 100 years. This is at a time when allotment demand is increasing. Out of 33 mature trees, 23 will be felled, along with a multitude of fruit trees and bushes.  Great harm will be caused to the habitats of various wildlife.If you would like to submit a comment on this application, its reference on the council website is P/2020/4292 I have submitted an objection thus: Objection to Park Road Development Application The only good thing that can be said about these buildings is that they are not excessively high compared with other applications in the area. However, the very idea of building on this site, with the loss of 23 trees out of 33 and a multitude of trees and bushes over two thirds of the present site should be considered unacceptable per se. The site is Local Open Space, has been designated an Asset of Community Value, and demand for allotments is hugely increasing due to the population increase in London and its concentration in apartment blocks. Figures obtained by the National Allotment Society (NAS): 40 per cent of councils who responded to the survey saw a "significant uplift" in applications during April 2020, with a 300 per cent increase in one case. The NAS also saw a 45 per cent increase in requests for information about allotments through its own website.  In Brentford there are expected to be many more apartments in 5-10 years than exist now, with an extraordinary community dispute growing over access to private areas of Brentford Dock and Brentford Lock. The continuing existence of green space and allotments should mitigate against this unwelcome trend. It is not acceptable for the applicant to provide smaller plots and say that solves the problem.

Ian Speed ● 1668d7 Comments ● 1645d

Getting to those falling through the vaccination net

There are quite a few very elderly simply falling through the net on vaccinations.If you know a neighbour particularly on their own it might help to check that they have had some form of communication and are not confused or unable to respond correctly.If you have a basic mobile phone ( which is very common in with over 70's) you will get a text message to call your GP. They will then call you back and take basic details for your suitability of the vaccine.(Sometimes texts come via audio texts on a landline. They are usually very hard to follow and understand.)GP practice can then set your appointment up for you and text you or call you with date, time and location.For this you do not need a smartphone or be online.But. If you only have a landline, you must call your GP and any other vital service and stress this to them so there is a clear note recorded to ensure you are either contacted by a person via landline or get a letter.Oddly many of the letters are being sent to over 80s inviting them to book online and at a location up to 45 mins away ( not including traffic deviations or volume)Completely housebound residents are being kept completely in the dark as are their regular District Nurses and Carers.If you know a housebound non ambulatory resident ( and a great many are hemmed in by  LTNs and are completely unknown. Check on them and make sure that their GP knows that cannot be transported.  A wrong assumption is being made with algorithm based data that a Housebound person can be transported.This has led to some being assumed to be refusing the vaccination by not being able to respond or having not stressed being totally unable to leave home.I noticed on BBC Breakfast how two spokespersons ducked and dived in avoiding questions about this very situation.It would be far better to either say they did not know or that the logistical issues are not resolved.  Transporting the Pfizer Vaccine is still a huge problem.A proper explanation would be far better, even if it's not particularly positive.

Raymond Havelock ● 1669d11 Comments ● 1649d

Look After My Bills Nightmare.

This is a post from today (Monday 8 February) put on the Facebook page, Look After My Bills Problem Reporting Page by B**** Orm***"After initially being attracted by the promise of finding consumers the best market deal and starting the registration process, I read some worrying reviews and immediately cancelled - told LAMB that I had changed my mind and did not want them to look after my bills. Subsequently I continued to receive emails saying I had been transferred, causing me grief and frustration. I again informed them that I did not want LAMB to look after my bills and also emailed my current supplier to tell them I did not want LAMB to transfer me and that I wished to remain with Coop Energy. LAMB continued to email me about my transfer. What a nightmare! Fortunately Coop Energy stepped in on my behalf. This was quite some time ago and I continued to receive email from them but I have blocked them. Neil I wish you luck. Once they get their claws in you they fill your life with worry and anxiety. Relentless!"                                                                                                                                                                     For some reason, Money Saving Expert Martin Lewis on Saturday 6 February urged energy users to use switching companies such as Look After My Bills to try to get cheaper energy.                               All I can say is, before you consider doing this look at the Facebook groups page Look after My Bills Problem Reporting Page and Trustpilot, Look After My Bills reviews before making a decision you may regret for months to come.

Neil Milkins ● 1651d0 Comments ● 1651d

The death of local democracy

We have all been so happy to finally see the peaceful transfer of power in the USA this week; the removal of a fanatical tyrant who ignored the interests of the people he represented, with often fatal consequences; and the commitment of the new leader to represent ALL the people of the country, including those who didn’t vote for him. Contrast this with our own local government and their continued anti-democratic denial of the right to have our views listened to and acted on by those who would pretend to represent us. Our local councillor is remarkably candid in admitting that the Streetspace / LTN roll-out will continue regardless of the massive continued opposition by the majority of those who’s lives have been affected – he has said he is happy to engage [forum 27/11], but that is clearly a politician’s promise – unless he is referring to the secret meeting just before Christmas that only 3 residents were able to find out about. He compares these changes to the fight against drink-driving; as though there is any comparison between a law that saves lives and the continued attack on freedom of movement that will probably cost lives – does he think we will be persuaded by such childish arguments? Ealing is pressing ahead with its own war against its electorate – this is despite a massive 77.5% negative feedback – two councils working together to heap misery on those who need to travel to work, shop or care for loved-ones. They would have us believe that these measures are pro-cycling and pro-pedestrian – was there ever a problem walking or cycling down the roads that have been closed? Would not a more pedestrian-friendly option be to reinstate school crossing patrols to protect our children on the way to school – there is plenty of money sloshing around to build cycle lanes – could some be diverted to safeguard children? But, of course, this policy was never pro-pedestrian – it’s simply anti-car. We might aspire to have Biden-like representation in local government, but we’re clearly stuck with mini Trumps building their walls and dividing communities whilst denying the obvious and real opposition of those who’s lives have been blighted by their pointless vanity project.

Graham Thorpe ● 1669d23 Comments ● 1656d

FUNERAL ARRANGEMENTS.

FUNERAL ARRANGEMENTS.For some people it is not bearable to think about, or to plan for their own funeral or for that of their spouse. However in these uncertain times I believe it is a responsible thing to do to take some of the pressure and grief off family members by not leaving things to late. Myself and my wife have taken steps to leave very little for our family members to worry about regarding these arrangementsWe have taken steps to arrange Pure Cremation funerals which was catapulted into the news a few years ago by singer David Bowie. For instance, if I die first, my wife will contact a funeral director in Hampshire. They will take care of all the arrangements needed. I would be collected from my home or from anywhere else and taken to Hampshire to to the funeral director's own private crematorium for disposal. No flowers, no family present and no funeral service. Arrangements have already been made for a memorial service shortly after my death.The benefits of doing things this way is that the cost to my wife and family is minimal. If I die at home the cost of the complete funeral arrangement is £1195.00 or £1.445 if I die in hospital or nursing home. The average cost of a cremation funeral in the UK is £3,986, sometimes thousands more.Being a very competitive business I am sure that some funeral directors would charge less than £1195.00.Nobody wants to die, but time and unforeseen events befall us all. In the mean time wash your hands and socially distance.

Neil Milkins ● 1664d0 Comments ● 1664d

Book a vaccination through the national booking system

Good Afternoon to Residents & Partner Organisations of Hounslow CCGPlease see important messages below and attached posterLetters are now being sent to NW London residents to book a vaccination through the national booking systemLetters inviting residents to register for an appointment at large vaccination centres have now started to be sent out by the national booking service to people in the first priority groups.The letters invite people to log onto the national booking system or call a national number to book their appointment at a centre within 45 minutes of their home address.More information about the national booking service here.The letter will include a unique booking code and individual NHS ID number to support the booking – these will be needed from the letter to book the appointment.Residents will not be able to book an appointment until they receive this invite letter, which will be sent when it’s your turn for  a vaccination.Letters will initially go to people in the top JCVI groups who are in reasonable travelling distance of the locations that are open, and who haven’t already been vaccinated through other NHS vaccination services.People will only be able to book into the large vaccination centres and pharmacies using this system.More large vaccination centres and pharmacies will open over the next few weeks, which will be added to the booking system.Residents are being reminded that if they have already booked an appointment with their GP they should ignore this letter.Public information is also available here https://www.nwlondonccgs.nhs.uk/coronavirus/nhs-covid-19-vaccination-programmeReminder not to turn up too early to ensure social distancingIf you have an appointment booked, please try to ensure that you arrive no more than five minutes before your appointment time.  This is to avoid you having to wait in long queues outside.When you attend your appointment, you'll need to:    bring a face covering, unless you are exempt from wearing one    wear a loose fitting top that lets you uncover your upper arm easily    bring your booking reference and NHS number, found on your invite letter, if your appointment is at a vaccination centreIf you need a carer you can bring them with you on the day.If you’ve not been invited for a vaccination yet, don’t worry.  The NHS will let you know when it's your turn to have the vaccine. It's important not to contact the NHS for a vaccination before then.For more information you can go to the website:https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/Kind regardsHounslow CCG Communications TeamWebsite: www.hounslowccg.nhs.ukTwitter: @HounslowCCG

Bernard Allen ● 1672d9 Comments ● 1665d

About time too!

AGAIN LABOUR COUNCILLORS BREAK RANK AND CHALLENGE CLLR STEVE CURRAN AND CABINET. This is the third time in three months – unprecedented since her took over.Two groups of councillors have called in Cabinet decisions to be examined by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee.The first call-in – next Wednesday – is supported by the 12 councillors below, with the lead being Cllr Unsa Chaudri. It concerns the Cabinet's decision to purchase affordable homes in developments in Brentford, Hounslow High Street and Feltham, at a cost of £82m.The second call-in – to be heard one week later – concerns the Cabinet's decision regarding Council Tax Support. It is led by Cllr Theo Dennison and proposes consultation on cuts of up to £7.8m in support for the Borough's poorest households. Fuller details of this call-in are not yet available.These follow one last November regarding traffic changes – when Cllr Richard Eason called for the resignations of two Cabinet members, Cllr Katherine Dunne and Hanif Khan.Details of next Wednesday's call-in became available today and are as follows:What Decision is to be Called-In: Council Housing Building Programme Update “ ...approved the following purchase schemes to be included within the approved Council Housing Building Programme:1. 50 homes from Network Homes in Fern Grove, Feltham.2. 55 homes from Barratt Homes at High Street Quarter, Hounslow.3. 164 homes from Berkeley Homes/St Edwards at the Homebase site in Syon, Brentford.”Whose Decision is being called in: Affordable Housing Committee (Councillor Steve Curran –Leader of the Council and Cabinet Member for Corporate Strategy, Planning and Regeneration)Reason(s) for Call-In (Continue on a separate sheet if required):1 Inadequate consultation with stakeholders prior to the decision;· This item did not appear on the Forward Plan for a clear 28 days.· There has been no consultation with ward councillors in respect of majorproposals likely to impact the immediate area.· The Ward location of one site was incorrectly stated.· The status of at least one of these sites is otherwise described in the LocalPlan and consultation does not appear to have been considered to begin to resolve this.2 Inadequate evidence on which to base a decision;· The report contains assumptions of outcomes from a yet to be decided planning application.· The decision allows for procurement, agreeing terms, associated costs, without detailing or showing these costs.· The report does not refer to any agreement for future costs and charges to the authority or potential tenants should the report be agreed.3 Contrary to the budget or policy framework;· This decision does not adequately explain the financial implications of these proposed purchases.· There is insufficient shared Background Information to explain processes, unit costs, specifications and the appropriateness of the mix of purchase being sought.A key decision but not treated as such;With an estimated cost c.£81.9m plus transaction costs and ongoing revenue costs this must a key decisionInsufficient consideration of legal and financial adviceThe report contains no information on future financial implications (revenue costs) of purchasing leasehold properties within a larger development There is no evidence of any legal advice on the implications of making this decision prior to the authority making a decision on Planning Permission

Vanessa Smith ● 1670d5 Comments ● 1668d

Gas and electric suppliers.

ENERGY SUPPLIERS.Because I haven't got a head for figures I have stuck with SSE Swalek for 47 years. But owing to Look After My Bills without my permission signing me up to Utility Point in October 2021, I have had the opportunity to try and figure out which energy provider gives the best deal. I have learned that using switching companies provides the worst deals and leave behind a trail of stress. For instance Look  After My Bills and Utility Point for 4 months have both blamed each other and both have launched an investigation into the mess they have dropped me in. And the situation has not been resolved with 2 BBC consumer programmes investigating hundreds if not thousands of complaints against these 2 companies.My energy provider for 47 years, SSE had suggested that I start off with them as a new customer and on 12-1-21 a contract was agreed with a customer service agent emailing me the following details."Good day Mr Milkins,This is to confirm the effective start date with Swalec-SSE is the 29 January 2021 to take over the gas and electricity supply.This means that you will only be charged from the date mentioned above going forward. All other charges will be applied by your current supplier until the date your supply starts with Swalec-SSE.Thank you.Regards,Yolanda."Hooray. Then I get the following  email from Jolene from SSE on 20-1-20."I understand that you have been sent an email regarding the dates the supply has come back to us and you were advised that you would not have a bill until SSE started [29-1-21], feedback is being provided to that adviser so this incorrect information is not given in the future, for this I can offer a goodwill payment of £30.00 for incorrect information given. SSE can keep their £30 !!!!!!!!!!I have now learned how easy it is to find the cheapest deal for gas and electric. Find a company offering a 2 year fixed tariff which I have done. To date, the best deal offers a 2 year fixed tariff.                                 For gas, the daily standing charge is 27 pence per day. The charge for gas is 2.952 pence per kw hour.For electric, the standing charge is 24.02 pence per day. The charge for electric is 17.42 per kw hour.These prices are considerably cheaper than my former supplier. If anyone can direct me to a better deal, please let me know as haven't signed up to EDF yet.

Neil Milkins ● 1668d0 Comments ● 1668d

OFGEM Investigation Into Utility Point.

IMPORTANT UPDATE. UTILITY POINT HAVE HAD THEIR SUPPLY LICENCES REVOKED BY OFGEM?                                                                                                                                                                                          After spending nearly 4 months trying to get to the bottom  of how Look After My Bills illegally changed my energy supplier from SSE to Utility Point, today has come a breakthrough. I had to deal with the matter myself after Look After My Bills who claimed to have started an investigation into the matter 65 days ago refused to respond to my last dozen or so phone calls or my last 8 emails. Today someone posted the following on trusted website Trustpilot regarding Utility Point and Look After My Bills.                                                                                                                                   "I just got a quote from LAMB and it suggested I change to a company called Utility Point.According to Trustpilot, this company are under investigation regarding giving customers incentives for positive reviews.The OFGEM website says they have revoked their supply licences with effect from 4 January 2021.LAMB...you say you work with suppliers who value their customers and are committed to improving their customer service.“Don’t worry, if a supplier has terrible customer service we won’t switch you to them even if they want to pay us!”I think you need to have an urgent review of some of the companies you are recommending.I won’t be using LAMB."

Neil Milkins ● 1679d3 Comments ● 1676d

Look After My Bills Nightmare.

Sorry to get on peoples' nerves but my warning to people about the possibility of the collapse of energy company Utility Point has shaken Look After My Bills into issuing the following statement to a disgruntled Trustpilot reviewer.                                                                                                                                                 Hi Jenny,I understand that there has been a lot of concerns around receiving your refund from Utility Point.At this point in time last year, we switched a lot of customers to Utility Point, we are now switching these customers away from Utility Point. This means that Utility Point have to process refunds for 1000's of customers, so please bear with them as this can take some time. They have doubled their resources to help deal with this backlog and have informed us that the majority of these refunds will be processed in the next 10 days.We review the suppliers we work with regularly based on a number of factors including customers' feedback, Trustpilot reviews, Citizens Advice Bureau and financial stability. If we have several customers expressing dissatisfaction with a particular supplier, we raise an investigation to decide whether we want to continue working with them.If you can kindly respond to my private request for more information then I can look to go through your account with us in greater detail and let you know how best to proceed.I look forward to hearing from you.​Thomas - Senior Energy AdviserLook After My Bills

Neil Milkins ● 1682d0 Comments ● 1682d

Look After My Bills Nightmare.

To save people the agony of having to deal with a future nightmare  with Look After My Bills and Utility Point please read their horrendous reviews on Trustpilot.                                  This is an email I received from Trustpilot this week.                                                People are reading your review!Hi Neil Milkins,You recently wrote a review on Trustpilot and it looks like people find it helpful.117 people have already read your review.                                                                                                       LOOK AFTER MY BILLS SHAMBLES.It is now 12 weeks since Look After My Bills without my knowledge or permission changed my energy provider from S.S.E. to Utility Point. Jacqueline Loughman promised me 9 weeks ago that they would resolve the matter within 14 days. A week ago their senior complaints manager Daniel promised me he would phone me on (29-12-20) and have the matter resolved. No phone call and no answer to my emails to him. In the meantime I am going to have a sky high electric and gas bill when this matter is resolved. It is near impossible to get a reply from them once you have emailed and phoned them and it is totally impossible to phone Utility Point as ALL their phone lines have been cut off. I have been on the phone and emailing 19 hours in total trying to sort this mess out. Anyone thinking of going with Look After My Bills or Utility Point please check their horrendous reviews on Trustpilot.

Neil Milkins ● 1688d2 Comments ● 1688d

The Council WANTS to hear from Isleworth residents

I've posted this on the CW4 Forum but it is important for Isleworth residents too.   You have until Tuesday 12th JANUARY to make your comments known to Hounslow Council, it's earlier if you're attempting to run a Business, that one is Thursday 7th January.Should you be concerned about the traffic issues in our lovely borough, finally HOUNSLOW COUNCIL are ASKING FOR YOUR OPINIONS but you must do this almost immediately after NEW YEAR.The Council has organised a series of engagement meetings online, the link is given below, on the many road changes made so far including one for Businesses in the Borough, the C9 in Chiswick and Brentford, the road closures in the centre of Chiswick and the South Chiswick Liveable Neighbourhood scheme in Grove Park/Strand on the Green.    (Not included are the many additional schemes for further LTN's to come)It’s important that as many opposing voices as possible are heard to challenge Hounslow Council's view that these schemes are well supported.  WE NEED TO RAISE THE DIFFICULTIES THEY HAVE CAUSED.There are four events, allocated by area, anyone can attend.  They are online, book via Eventbrite using the link below. Hounslow Council wants people to submit questions in advance though they can also be asked during the sessions.  More details via the link.https://www.hounslow.gov.uk/news/article/2236/hounslow_moves_ahead_with_next_round_of_phases_1_and_2_streetspace_engagementThe dates are:•    7pm on Thursday, 7th January: BUSINESSES  boroughwide•    7pm on Friday, 8th January: North Chiswick (LBH language for north of the A4 - including C9 in Chiswick and Brentford & the road closures in the centre of Chiswick)•    7pm on MONDAY, 11th JANUARY: South Chiswick (LBH LANGUAGE FOR SOUTH OF THE A4 - incl. Hartington Rd)•    7pm on Tuesday, 12th January: IsleworthPlease circulate this widely to friends, family and neighbourhood groups. It is vital that the other side of the argument regarding the borough’s traffic is heard.Hounslow Council say they WANT TO HEAR FROM US - NOW IS THE TIME TO SPEAK UP, it's our last chance!They have more LTN's planned for us here in W4 too.  So get your voices out there now before they start on the next tranche of misery.

Jennifer Selig ● 1698d3 Comments ● 1689d

E-scooters and legal use

Reading the report on this sites news page and one wonders if our Council are from another dimension.Have none of these people seen what is already going on out in the streets of this borough?There are E scooter users riding with 2 people, riding on pavements, roads, in the dark, hooded,, no lights. often no refelective gear at all, or safety gear, riding along with dogs. Then riding with ear plugs and by the nature of the design completely unable to use hand signals or look behind them without losing control.70 years nearly of RoSPA and it's come down to this - just to suit a trend wave?Now a shop selling these and marketing towards pre- provisional licence age young people is to open in Northfields Ave.Yet on the BBC a report states that riding these is still illegal.Its so twisted that cameras and  all means of enforcement can be deployed against fully insured and tested road users and yet not for people who clearly break the law, show not road sense for themselves or for others, pedestrians or road users.This current behaviour underlines the fact that users cannot be trusted so clear and effective regulations have to be in place.HGV and PCV drivers go through hell and risk losing their livelihoods if involved with a cyclist accident. They are treated as though guilty before any evidence or investigations are completed.Even when found completely not at fault, they are pilloried on social media.  yet very little ever mentioned of the victim if it was in the event their fault. Or if it was neither parties actual fault.But one is not insured, tested, retested and trained.  The other is not.And those supporting all this remain very deft at avoiding the facts and the real problems and issues.RoSPA , set up to bring safer use of roads for ALL road users has been completely swept aside and this is slamming all the advances and changes that they have brought about. Wholly irresponsible to the point of arrogant stupidity.                

Raymond Havelock ● 1717d7 Comments ● 1715d

Fighting to save bowling in Gunnersbury Park

A great many of you were disgusted at the appalling way CIC treated the Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club and expressed your support for our fight, so here's an update. Putt in the Park, with the backing of the CIC, put in a planning application, which would involve destroying the bowling green in order to turn it into crazy golf and use the pavilion as a restaurant/cafe. The first application was refused. They have now put in another application. Since the project remains the same, if there were a level playing field this application should also be refused. But who knows what's going on in the background...Our task now is to make sure the Planning Committee know how much we value the bowling facility and want it to continue. Our objections should be sent to planning.objections@hounslow.gov.uk under the email title :Bowls Green and Pavilion, Gunnersbury Park, W3 8LQ (Ref: P/2020/3080) by 30 October 2020. Bowling is an almost a century-old tradition in GP, it's excellent to maintain physical health, to promote wellbeing and good mental health, to help combat obesity, to prevent loneliness and isolation in the older community. It should remain in the park as an amenity for posterity, costing the councils not a penny as it would continue to be maintained and looked after by the members as it has for so many years. If we win our fight, anyone can come along on their own or with friends to try bowling. We can provide free instruction to get you started and also the free use of equipment. You'll really enjoy it! So send in your objections and let us safeguard bowling in GP!

Bela Cunha ● 1772d16 Comments ● 1732d

Hounslow Labour Councillor abuses Pensioners 4th November 2020.

A 69-year-old pensioner has been abused and publicly slandered by a serving Isleworth Councillor, who until 2018, served as the Borough of Hounslow Mayoress.The 69-year-old was sitting watching a European Football match in a community club in Isleworth when Councillor Sue Sampson aggressively approached (uninvited) and demanded the pensioner leave the club.  Ms Sampson seemed agitated and uncontrolled and her spoken broadcast was made (loudly) in front of several dozen people.  It was embarrassing.  The encounter went like this: -Councillor Sampson “You have got to leave this club now”.Pensioner (after being taken aback) “Oh, why is that?Councillor Sampson “Because you are being investigated by the police for identity fraud”.Councillor Sampson “and, you have heard from my Solicitor”Pensioner “I have never heard from your solicitor”Councillor Sampson “It doesn’t matter, you have to leave this club”.Pensioner “I’ve just told you I have not heard from a solicitor”Councillor Sampson “You can’t speak.  You have to leave this club now”.At that point, the pensioner (me) left the building feeling absolutely humiliated and confused.I wrote to (and emailed) Ms. Sampson two days later and requested the Police Crime Reference she alluded to and that ‘her solicitor’ clearly spell out what this ‘fraud’ was.  Not heard a word from her, the police, or any solicitor.This encounter was distressing enough but I’ve been contacted by and 80-year-old woman and a 64-year-old man who have confirmed Ms Sampson abused them shortly after I left the club that evening.Needless to say, a full complaint is being prepared and will be submitted to the appropriate authorities in due course.

Christopher Devlin ● 1741d9 Comments ● 1734d

Punch-ups at Hounslow

‎Brentford TV‎ to Brentford Today & TV: #Debate Not Hate#7tSponhsodaregd · OPEN WARFARE ERUPTS ON COUNCIL: VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE IN STEVE CURRAN PROPOSED BY CHISWICK CONSERVATIVES. A degree of antagonism is to be expected between councillors but the recent traffic schemes have stoked it to a new high, going from smouldering to red-hot. It has now crossed a line and got up close and personal. It has turned from mere hostility into undisguised fury, a state as close to open warfare as councillors can get without carrying arms.At the heart of the matter are the changes on Chiswick High Road, Turnham Green Terrace and Devonshire Road. It is not just their physical implementation, good or bad. It is about whether the Labour Council – with overwhelming Labour votes from Brentford to Feltham – really cares sufficiently about the relatively well-off Tory bastion on its eastern fringe. Backers of Cllrs McGregor and Biddolph believe it doesn't, that consultation has been minimal to non-existent, and that all this is evidence of political malice and class warfare, aggravated by a cultural chasm. It is Chiswick v the Rest.At first glance there seems little chance of the motion passing – Labour has a big majority – but it could trigger a process in the Labour Group itself to vote on Cllr Curran's leadership. The Group meets on Monday, the day before the Council meeting. When elected to his position, Cllr Curran won by one vote. Other Labour councillors could now offer themselves to the Group as an alternative – and there are a number of possible contenders: Amrit Mann, Katherine Dunne, Tom Bruce, Shantanu Rajawat. This is what happened in the Ealing Council Labour Group in similar circumstances recently, also centred around traffic changes – and their leader, Julian Bell, only just scraped home. The Hounslow Group doesn't have to follow suit but it could if it chose to do so. At this stage, it would look disloyal to step forward but the option remains open. If that happened, Cllr Curran would need to round up and secure support with various promises. He is a strong personality who loves his job and he would not give it up without a hello of a fight. He sees himself continuing for a number of years.The council debate itself offers a platform for the Tory rump to put the blame where they believe it belongs: on Cllr Curran and his Cabinet colleagues. They argue that he has used the current crisis to ram through major changes without the need for discussion and against the wishes of many locals. They will stake their position ready for the next council elections – under Cllr McGregor, an old bruiser – hoping that voters elsewhere may join them in their opposition to Cllr Curran's style of leadership. In response Cllr Curran will no doubt say the new restrictions were brought in at the behest of the Tory government, are on trial and will be independently reviewed in time. The Tories will say the High Road cannot wait, that he is "destroying Chiswick".It's the sort of row which would best be relished in the Council Chamber itself, where others can join in with a bit of shouting and jeering. Instead it will be online and not so entertaining. On the other hand it will be accessible and there will be many, not just in Chiswick, who might tune in for the big fight and savour the thumping even if there is no chance of a knock-out.

Vanessa Smith ● 1748d4 Comments ● 1745d

Swyncombe Ave to be blocked off

Informed yesterday that borough engineers have been measuring up for the blocking off of Swycombe Ave.This is being claimed as a direct fallout of the LTNs in Northfields & Boston ManorTheres no doubt it is a bit busier and for longer. But then Windmill road and the section to Northfields is far busier and taking an age on the E2 even at usually quiet times of the day.But the LTNs have been installed in very quiet localities.I think the extra traffic is more down to the major roadworks in South Ealing Road and Culmington road/Church lane with huge diversions which feed to Northfields and Little Ealing Lane plus the Road works in Boston Manor road Half Acre leaving Swyncombe Ave. as an only through route for local traffic.A bus route uses the road for students only and yet for 70 years even London transport have been refused permission to operate a bus route through the road, even a hoppa type was refused in the 1990sBut in all honesty, Swyncombe has always been a busier road even when at school in the 1970s it was a bit of a race track and had long queues.Residents concerns were dismissed as long ago as 1971 when Gunnersbury School was planned to move to the locality and expand by 200%.  There were though more schools locally then but in recent months a new school has reopened at the bottom of the road. But then there were two thriving sports grounds which had traffic all weekend. That's gone now so it's actually quieter. But closing it?   That will be as damaging as the LTNs and divide a community up even more.The real losers will actually be the residents of Swyncombe Ave as they will have the same problems inflicted as those in LTNs are experiencing now, especially the further isolation of elderly, less able and infirm.This is the result of meddling where it was not needed. Creates a problem that did not exist, and spawns another problem in the next street. and on and on.Hounslow ought to be leaning on Ealing over the LTNs without consultation, not looking to expand on an already ineffective imposition.It has to be accepted too that it is the Key local link route for emergency services. The Ambulance Station is in Boston Manor road and is already badly affected by the LTNs.For this reason and that it is also the route to a rehabilitation hospital, that there are no speed humps to allow safe transit of frail patients.And the wisdom of closing Occupation lane is still rather poor as that is causing patient transport issues especially for volunteer tranpost who do not have the benefit of air suspension vehicles.It could be anyone of us,family, friends or colleagues that might need that facility at any time.But certainly something to calm the speeds of road users. It's one of the few roads where the 20mph is less observed.

Raymond Havelock ● 1768d30 Comments ● 1745d

Transport Secretary admits new cycle lanes are leaving roads backed up.

Transport Secretary admits new cycle lanes are leaving roads 'backed up' with trafficGrant Shapps warns he is 'not prepared to tolerate' badly designed closures and cycle lanes, imposing 'sweeping changes' to communities. The Transport Secretary has admitted too many cycle lanes are being left “unused” with traffic “backed up” as a result of his green transport revolution, The Telegraph can reveal.In a strongly worded letter sent to councils, Grant Shapps has warned he is “not prepared to tolerate” badly designed road closures and new cycle lanes which are imposing “sweeping changes” to entire communities.And in a move that will infuriate cycling and green campaigners, he has declared the Government is not anti-car, explaining: “No one should be in doubt about our support for motorists.”Mr Shapps announced a £250 million Emergency Active Travel Fund in May intended to promote walking and cycling as the country emerged from lockdown. Councils were invited to apply for the cash by drawing up projects intended to entice people away from their cars and take more active forms of travel.However, critics have complained that badly designed road closures and new cycle lanes have in fact increased traffic and pollution on main roads, as well as reduced the number of people visiting high streets at a time when small businesses are desperate to recover from lockdown.Private residents have even launched legal action, claiming that because the schemes were introduced under emergency Covid powers, disability groups, local residents and businesses were not consulted, and consequently, normal local democratic procedures have been ignored.Meanwhile, so-called ‘Low Traffic Neighbourhoods’, where bollards and planters close off residential streets to traffic, have resulted in delays to 999 emergency response times as police, paramedics and fire crews encounter newly shut roads.The letter, sent on Friday to local authority transport bosses and local highways authorities and seen by The Telegraph, warns how a “notable number of councils used their funding poorly and were simply out of step with the needs of the local communities.”Mr Shapps continues: “I saw or heard from the public and parliamentary colleagues about far too many instances where temporary cycles lanes were unused due to their location and design, while their creation left motor traffic backed up alongside them; of wide pavements causing unnecessary congestion in town centres; and other issues that many have, rightly, reacted angrily to.”He explains how he had ordered his staff to “engage” with those councils where he had “concerns”, because badly thought out road closures and cycle lanes had been introduced.“Since then, numerous schemes have been scaled back and revised,” he wrote. “I am pleased with this, but the work will continue where local residents continue to have concerns.”He warns the second round of funding in the scheme could see some town halls receiving “considerably less” money if they fail to “embrace good design” or “consult their local communities”.He adds: “We all want to see the benefits that active travel brings to be realised, but poorly implemented schemes will make no friends for the policy or more broadly for active travel…“The crucial test is, does it deliver for the community it serves, and has it been done with their consultation.“Schemes must balance the needs of cyclists and pedestrians with the needs of other road users, including motorists and local businesses.“Only authorities which have passed these key tests will receive the funding they have asked for.“I want to be absolutely clear: we are not prepared to tolerate hastily introduced schemes which will create sweeping changes to communities without consultation, and ones where the benefits to cycling and walking do not outweigh the dis-benefits for other road users.”With The letter comes after thousands of people have held demonstrations and signed petitions forcing some town hall bosses into a series of humiliating U-turns after they introduced schemes with little or no public consultation.Last week, the Telegraph revealed how some councils were making hundreds of thousands of pounds in fines from motorists driving on newly closed roads.Projects in some parts of London have proven so divisive that planters have been daubed with graffiti and bollards ripped from the concrete. In one West London borough, opposition has been so vehement that police have had to attend to support council workers as they installed planters and bollards to close roads.So far, a total of £42,102,454 has been secured by 111 councils in England, including many London boroughs where opposition has been most vocal.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/10/17/transport-secretary-admits-new-cycle-lanes-leaving-roads-backed/

Bernard Allen ● 1764d8 Comments ● 1752d

Hounslow's answer to Dominic Cummings?

For those familiar with the saga of the cladding/painting houses on two estates in Isleworth and the unhappiness of tenants and neighbours over the chosen colour on some homes, the role of the planning department in this was also being questioned. Advice from an independent source was that no planning permission was required and the work could have been done under permitted development.A Freedom of Information request to ascertain why Hounslow's housing and planning departments had gone down this road was returned with an answer that confirmed that our advice was indeed correct, but still did not answer the question as to why this was done. We pointed out that the information in the FOI was in fact incorrect so therefore there was no need at all for planning permission and we again asked for an explanation of their actions. Having gone round in ever decreasing circles and still not getting the courtesy of an straightforward answer I wrote to one of the Isleworth councillors, copying in the cabinet member for housing who had previously poo-pood residents complaints and asked that they personally asked planning and housing for an answer. Today I am told that our queries are being treated as a Stage 1 complaint, as we had not asked to go down this route I asked why this was happening without our agreement? The answer staggered me:"I have asked firmly and frankly for answers to these questions multiple times. I have also made my opinion very clear on this colour scheme. Peter Matthew has been very clear he will only deal with further questions and concerns as a Stage 1 complaint." So, an elected member is letting a council officer, a paid borough employee dictate what he will and won't do, since when did we elect officers? We elect councillors to act as our representatives and advocates not to stand for this nonsense. I find this absolutely outrageous, and it is clear that this officer will use the council's appallingly slow and ineffective complaints process as an opportunity to keep kicking this matter into the long grass. There have been many justified comments about how our P.M. is having his plonker pulled by one Dominic Cummings - well here we have the Hounslow version. What is wrong with the people we elect? It is quite simple - why did the housing department let planning persuade them they needed planning permission for work that could have been carried out under permitted development? Why did the affected homes have the removal of their permitted development rights inserted as a condition of the planning permission? Why were planning officers allowed to dictate the external colour scheme without any consultation?

Vanessa Smith ● 1767d1 Comments ● 1767d

Another nail in the coffin.

Wards: Brentford – Isleworth – Osterley and Spring Grove - SyonItem Address Ward Ref. No. Case officer details2 Syon Park, London Road, TW8 8JF Syon 00707/E/P116 rupinder.dhoot@hounslow.gov.ukProposal Creation of a one-way link road between Syon Park and London Road, including associated engineering operations, earthworks,drainage and landscaping.No. ofsubmissions:Summary of objections (x7)- Will negatively affect the existing quite cycle route linking Syon House to London Road.- Cuts through a Grade I listed landscape to sacrifice this for commercial gain is unacceptable.- Extra traffic will only add to delays and pollution.- Would create an urban intrusion into a local, national and internally valued rural setting.- No realistic assessment has been given of volume of vehicle movements.- Left exit into London Road with increased usage of Syon Lane off London Road.- With no future use of the Wyevale premises or a master plan predictions are not possible to ascertain potential maximum traffic flow.- If the gates are left open, as suggested, at the busiest hours of the day drivers would inevitably be tempted to ignore “no entry” signage andenter via the proposed new route.- No preventative measures are indicated to deter usage by lorries/large vehicles.- Proposed gates and signage would clutter an existing rural setting.- Loss of grassland.- Fails to preserve the character and appearance of the parkland and conservation area.- Fails to preserve or enhance both the setting and special architectural and historic character of the Grade I Listed landscape.- Very special circumstances of the proposed have not been demonstrated.- Archaeological survival potential is assessed as “high”; therefore, ground intrusion from proposed tree planting and subsequent root actionwould remove or severely disturb any archaeological remains at the planting location.- The planning application provides insufficient information on public benefits to offset what may be the “less than substantial harm” to aheritage asset.- Negative impact on biodiversity and Archaeology.Summary of support (x8)- Allowing vehicles to come off the main road will reduce congestion and pollution.- Closure of garden centre has led to a drop in visitors to the park the proposed road will help bring back visitors.- New egress will aid in cars being able to leave the site without having to use Park Road.- Will improve access to nursery.- Will help businesses and residents of Brentford.General comments (x4):- Closing Church Street was a terrible mistake19Wards: Brentford – Isleworth – Osterley and Spring Grove - Syon- Reopen Church Street with traffic calming measures.- Suspend all parking on Park Road on event days.- Opening Church Street would have prevented the closure of Wyevale Garden Centre.Summary of reasons for approval- Less that substantial harm to listed park outweighed by public benefit.- No harm to highway and pedestrian safety subject to safeguarding conditions.(Please note that this item was previously added to the week 11 list recommending refusal, since then further information has been submitted toovercome the reasons for refusal).

Vanessa Smith ● 1773d14 Comments ● 1767d

Chaos reigns

Bollards have suddenly appeared on Twickenham Road separating cyclists from the rest of the traffic and thereby narrowing an already overly congested road. And making access to West Mid hospital so awkward for the Ambulance service - there is nowhere for drivers to pull aside to let emergency vehicles pass! They have also placed bollards in Park Rd which has the rear access to WMUH! As far as we can tell no consultation with LAS was done prior to this bonkers and dangerous idea. Apparently this is to promote healthier lifestyles - the fact you might die because an ambulance cannot get access to a hospital doesn't matter! Really healthy!It has now been confirmed that no consultation with either LAS or the West Middx. hospital was done. The cycleway is now to be 'tweaked' with the view to allow easier access for the ambulance service whilst maintaining cycle safety. There is also going to be a road safey audit. Stable doors and horses?I'm not sure what passes for brains these days, but it seems to me that all relative consultations should have taken place before Hounslow went off on one, sticking bollards everywhere. Clearly if you are on a bike you are an exalted being around here - and sod the rest of us. It has also been declared that this is going to happen starting at Brentford Bridge right up to College Rd. Isleworth. I have reached the conclusion that the elected councillors in this borough are totally useless, and are only interested in dictating to the rest of us how we should live our lives, and if one more of them or their bloody officers mentions sodding Covid as a justification/excuse for imposing all this rubbiish on us I will scream.

Vanessa Smith ● 1781d19 Comments ● 1772d

Well, well, well.

‎Brentford TV‎ to Brentford Today & TV: #Debate Not Hate#5h · COUNCIL'S INTERNAL REPORT EXPOSES "PROBLEMS WITH CORPORATE CULTURE • PEOPLE POLICIES NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE • POOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT APPROACH" – As soon as he saw the document, Cllr John Todd took a screen grab. That was fortunate because, when he asked questions, it was immediately removed. It had been written by the senior management at Hounslow Borough Council and was a frank admission of serious performance failings. It declared: ‘Our digital offer is ineffective, our customer service delivery is not good enough (and)…We do not have a single Corporate, systematic way of understanding our customers and their needs.'The report was an Appendix to a recent Single Member Decision in which a Cabinet member sought an additional £500,000 to restructure the Council's Human Resources and Organisational Development Department.The Appendix said: "This is a programme of change, to ensure that the council is at the cutting edge of public service delivery. We are not at the moment…The first phase is to rectify current issues and problems with our corporate culture and infrastructure."We do not systematically look at how we are doing and how effective we are and whether what we are doing is meeting the real, objectively identified needs of our communities."Our people policies are not fit for purpose and our approach to investing and developing talent and rewarding people is inadequate."Our approach to public service reform and public service integration is segmented and very under-developed. Our approach to community engagement is poor. We are stuck in a neighbourhood renewal paradigm that pre-dates austerity."Cllr Todd says: "I posed a number of questions about this report believed to have been written in February including ‘who wrote this section?' and ‘where is the data previously published which evidences the adverse comments in this section?' I received a prompt response. The senior management had drafted this paragraph (italicised above). My second question was not answered to my satisfaction."Cllr Todd says: "My interest in the council's performance was heightened In June 2019 when the cabinet agreed a different way of assessing its performance data, highlighting success rather than failure. Our opposition role is to chase the latter so I met with the Chief Executive and Head of Overview and Scrutiny to express my concerns."My intervention over the HR and OD Report caused the Cabinet Member to direct that the published appendix I had quoted from be immediately removed from the LBH website. A most unusual course of action."The Cabinet member in question was Cllr Candice Atterton and here is the Council proposal she was approving: https://democraticservices.hounslow.gov.uk/documents/s163160/HR%20OD%20SMD%2027.8.20v2.pdf

Vanessa Smith ● 1804d1 Comments ● 1804d

Grant Shapps tells councils to stop abusing £250m

Grant Shapps tells councils to stop abusing £250m fund meant for green transport revolution https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/09/05/grant-shapps-tells-councils-stop-abusing-250m-fund-meant-green/Grant Shapps has told councils to stop abusing the £250 million fund meant for a green transport revolution by installing pointless one way systems and barriers that offer “no benefit to anyone”.Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, the Secretary of State for Transport says he will personally intervene to scrap the worst examples where local authorities have ruined high streets and residential roads in an attempt to build cycle lanes and promote social distancincing for pedestrians.His comments come after a series of petitions attracted thousands of signatures from people across the country who fear councils are pandering to the cycle lobby.Campaign groups representing the disabled, small business owners, pollution activists and motorists have criticised the schemes for being rushed through with little or no consultation.Many have claimed traffic congestion has been shifted elsewhere, while pollution has increased and many high street shops are struggling to emerge from lockdown because parking spaces have disappeared.In some London boroughs, planters closing off roads have been vandalised amid concerns emergency vehicle response times have plummeted as firefighters and paramedics have encountered new road layouts.Mr Shapps announced the £250 million scheme to promote “a new era for cycling and walking” at the height of lockdown in May.But today, Mr Shapps stresses how “not everything has worked” and because they are trials and the height of the Covid emergency has now passed there is ample opportunity for councils to consult local residents, businesses and the disabled.In a direct message to council leaders, he says: “Where some councils have abused the cash, my message is clear: speak to local residents, get it fixed or no more cash.”He adds that while some schemes had been “done well”, in the worst cases “a number of them will be coming out soon”.The Sunday Telegraph revealed in July how the minister had personally intervened in his own constituency after being dismayed with the way Hertfordshire County Council had set up a one-way system in the village of Welwyn which was said to have left the high street deserted.He writes: “Some councils have introduced random one-way systems, which don't seem to offer many benefits to anyone.“Some of those plastic barriers that have gone up in town centres to widen the pavements can actually prevent pedestrians, including disabled people, crossing the road.“They narrow the carriageway for traffic, causing congestion and increasing danger for cyclists. They reduce parking for essential visits to the pharmacy or dentist or doctor. And they don't seem to be much used by pedestrians either.”The minister said while many green activists claim the car should “die”, he believes it should instead “evolve” to help save the planet.As an electric car driver himself he added how he was an “electric head” rather than a petrol head, a description for those obsessed with fossil fuelled motor vehicles.He also said it was essential to “keep the main arteries of our economy flowing” at this pivotal time as Britain emerges from lockdown and prepares for Brexit.He adds: “For those who say we shouldn’t be building roads, I say there’s nothing green about standing still in traffic, pumping out CO2 and pollution.”However, the Road Haulage Association (RHA) remained adamant last night that more needed to be done to ease congestion after it had seen members, particularly in London, complaining how journey times were increasing.“We don’t believe that the Government has thought through the practical reality or economic consequences of reducing road space for vehicles,” a RHA spokesman said.“This will only lead to increased congestion and delays to deliveries – all of which increases the costs of moving goods – and somebody’s got to pay for that.“We’re all for a ‘green recovery’ but you can’t do this by clogging up our roads and making it more difficult for people and goods to get about.“On a local level, councils are using Covid-19 as an excuse to circumvent proper consultation about traffic schemes and ignoring their damaging economic and environmental consequences.“We’re hearing from members, especially in London, of increasing journey times and delays. In one instance round trips taking up to 50 percent longer than normal.”

Bernard Allen ● 1806d7 Comments ● 1805d

Paramedics couldn’t get to patient because of covid-bollards

Paramedics couldn’t get to patient because of covid-bollards blocking roadZoe Drewett Thursday 3 Sep 2020 10:57 amParamedics were delayed from treating a patient by 20 minutes because the road they wanted to take was blocked by newly installed bollards. The man was found unconscious by people living in Leighton Road in Ealing, London, at around 2.15pm on Saturday. Emergency services were called but the medics could not get past new bollards and raised flowers beds installed at the road junction. It has emerged the area is one of ten new ‘low traffic neighbourhoods’, created during the pandemic to make social distancing easier. According to the council’s website, the low traffic neighbourhoods are ‘essential for the post-lock down period where social distancing is needed, and public transport is at reduced capacity’.It is hoped that making the area only accessible to pedestrians and cyclists will ‘prevent increased future rat running’ as people choose to stay away from buses and trains and drive more instead. But London Ambulance Service had not been issued with keys to the new bollards – put up by Ealing Council three days before the man’s collapse. Witnesses said the paramedics were angry they could not get close enough to help the man during the medical emergency. Dominic Small, 53, who lives near the alleyway where the man was found said it took the medics around 20 minutes to park, then they had to walk 40 yards with their equipment to help the patient.He said: ‘The paramedic was really quite cross about the whole situation. In the end he had to park across on the other side of the barriers and walk to the patients around 30 to 40 meters and treat him that way. ‘If they had to get to him for something more serious, it could have been the difference between life and death. They had to go quite a distance and then if they had to trolley someone that far back to the ambulance it would cause a crucial delay. ‘The paramedics said it was a risk to health and safety and we should complain to the council as they can’t. ‘I asked the council why they haven’t removed the barriers given that they now know the ambulance services don’t have keys, but have not got a response yet.’The sick man was treated at the scene and refused to be taken to hospital, the ambulance service said. Ealing councillor David Millican said the bollards caused another ambulance hold-up on Tuesday evening when an elderly resident fell and had to wait an extra 30 minutes for paramedics to arrive because of the new diversion. The woman needed to stay in hospital overnight and is now said to be fine but her husband was worried about the slow response had it been a matter of life and death, the councillor said. He added: ‘I’ve been warning senior councillors and council officers for many weeks that the emergency services would struggle to navigate and pass through the road blocks.'The refuse lorries are also unable to pass through the barriers, meaning it is taking them much longer to complete their rounds, as there are sections of the scheme that their lorry cannot reach.‘If refuse lorries cannot pass through the barriers then clearly fire engines cannot either, despite the assurances we have received.’ Christina Fox, who lives near the new barriers, called them dangerous and said someone could ‘die waiting’ for an ambulance. London Ambulance Service claimed they reached the first patient within their target of 18 minutes for a category 2 emergency call. Category 2 calls are those that are classed as an emergency for a potentially serious condition that may require rapid assessment, urgent on-scene treatment or to be urgently taken to hospital. Ealing Council has been contacted for comment.Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2020/09/03/ambulance-couldnt-get-to-man-who-collapsed-because-of-road-bollards-13216848/?ito=cbshare Twitter: https://twitter.com/MetroUK | Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MetroUK/

Bernard Allen ● 1809d14 Comments ● 1806d

Secondhand book sale to raise funds for the FoodBox.

Brentford Voice’s recent Plant Exchange and Sale raised an impressive £680 thanks to you, our community. We would now like to try and help the Hounslow Community FoodBox again with your fantastic support.Brentford Voice will hold a secondhand book sale on 13th September 2020 beginning at 11.00 a.m. in the Market Place, High Street, Brentford. The sale will coincide with the regular Brentford Market which is held on the second Sunday of each month.All proceeds from the book sale will be donated to Hounslow Community FoodBox. Only cash payments will be accepted so please come armed with an adequate supply of coins and notes.In the light of current restrictions buyers will have to judge each book by its cover. There can be no browsing or tender fondling of books. Social distancing will be observed at all times, hand sanitiser will be provided, and masks are advised.We would very much welcome any donations of secondhand books. Books suitable for readers of any age - hardbacks and paperbacks, fiction and non-fiction - will all be most welcome. We ask only that your donations are in reasonably good condition.Donations can be dropped off in advance at:20 Avenue Road, TW8 9NS or 46 Lateward Road, TW8 0PLThe Verdict Bakery in the Market Square has very kindly offered to accept book donations in advance of the sale. Please drop off your books at the Verdict during their opening hours (8.00 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday to Saturday, and from 10.00 a.m. on Sunday).Alternatively, please bring along your donations to our stall in the Market Place from 10.30 am on 13th September.

Jim Storrar ● 1807d0 Comments ● 1807d

Rave at 35 Enfield Road

Last night I went to bed at about elevenish and became aware of a lot of noisy activity in the road.  Eventually I looked out of the window and saw a load of youths (male and female) gathering around 35 Enfield Road and going in and out of the property.  They looked as though they were up for a party.  Some arrived on foot, others by private car, some were dropped off by taxi.  The age range was probably late teens/early twenties.At about midnight the noise increased and about twenty (possibly more) people spilled out of the house and into the road where they milled around.  Shortly afterwards a police car arrived and also Hounslow's Noise Team.  There was music thumping away.The police officers had a long conversation with some of the occupants of the property and one of my neighbours and myself came out of our houses and spoke to the officers and also the noise people.  Apparently the back garden of the property was heaving with people - some of whom were smoking weed and taking cocaine.The owner does not live at the property but rents it out - we think he's been doing the airbnb thing.  A similar "event" took place at the property the weekend before last.  He is, apparently, not bothered on the occasions when he's been contacted about what's happened.Police said they were powerless to do anything; noise team said they would be contacting the owner.The party continued for most of the night.  The volume of music increased.  There were continual comings and goings and shouting in the street.  I observed people emerging from the property and urinating/defecating behind parked cars and then going back inside.I also rang the police and was told that they had been contacted by a number of local residents but that, in reality, there was very little they could do.I gather that this sort of thing is fairly common at the moment.  It's horrible for local residents who just want to go to sleep. The party was still going strong at 4am but I managed to get some sleep by going to the back of the house.  Did anyone else hear this event?  What can we do to make sure it doesn't happen again??

Alison Robins ● 1821d35 Comments ● 1817d

Is there a funny smell around here?

Hot on the heels of the news that our local aristocrat, the Duke of Northumberland who is still trying to build on the local allotments,  is the staggering revelation that the Northumberland fortune has seen upwards of a £36M increase. Quite why some of that can't go towards the work we keep being told is needed on Syon House we do not know.There are also worries about the somewhat close relationship of Hounslow council's Leader and the Northumberland Estate who have had three meetings to dicuss future plans which include a fresh planning application, in spite of the Estate losing the public inquiry at the end of 2018, which says the allotment site should remain as local open space.We seem right to be concerned about these meetings when you read what 'The Guardian' has highlighted about the dubious deals councils - Hounslow among them - are stitching up with developers, and not for the good of any local people."Revealed: London councils take funds from developers to pay for planning guidelinesCritics say ‘poachers have become gamekeepers’ as a result, but councils deny conflict of interestThe final straw? Tory heartlands in revolt over planning reformsMoD cavalry barracks in HounslowThe Ministry of Defence paid Hounslow council £20,000 to fund supplementary planning guidance for its cavalry barracks, which it plans to sell for the development of 1,000 homes. Photograph: Martin Argles/The GuardianRobert Booth Social affairs correspondentSun 23 Aug 2020 17.40 BST266Councils have accepted hundreds of thousands of pounds from property developers to fund planning guidelines designed to help govern their own schemes, a Guardian analysis has found.In deals that have been criticised for allowing unfair influence and marginalising local residents, bodies including housing developers, landowners and urban regeneration companies paid large sums to draft supplementary planning documents (SPDs), which councillors must then consider when determining planning applications.The planning documents subsequently published set out major and potentially lucrative development strategies for the sites in which they have an interest. The payments are not declared in the documents.AdvertisementCouncils, which normally fund SPDs, and developers have denied allegations of conflicts of interest, but critics fear the arrangements mean “poachers become gamekeepers”.The practice has emerged less than two weeks after ministers announced a wholesale reform of the planning system which campaigners and voters fear will hand greater powers to developers in order to speed up building.According to responses the Guardian obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, Conservative-run Barnet council in north London received £223,000 from the housing association Notting Hill Genesis to cover the costs of a planning brief for Grahame Park, a 3,000-home estate regeneration. The borough accepted the money via its joint venture company with Capita.The SPD for Grahame Park specified additional social housing only “where viable” and the housing association later proposed cutting the number of affordable homes by 257. The London mayor, Sadiq Khan, described it as “a classic example of how not to do estate regeneration”.In Hounslow, west London, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) paid the Labour-run council £20,000 to fund supplementary planning guidance for a barracks site it is planning to sell for the development of 1,000 homes, which critics have attacked as over-development.In response to a freedom of information request to all English councils, none outside the capital said they engaged in the practice.The London councils insist the arrangements afford developers no unfair influence over what is permitted on the sites, but some cited budget shortfalls as the reason for needing to take the money. Critics, however, attacked the practice.“It is blatant collusion between planning authorities and developers,” said Bob Colenutt, the head of research the Northampton Institute for Urban Affairs and author of The Property Lobby. “Is this what the government means by cutting planning red tape? ... Poachers have become gamekeepers with local councils ceding yet more influence over planning to vested interests in speculative development.”Steve Reed, the shadow communities and local government secretary, said: “Government cuts to council funding have left town halls without the resources to develop full planning guidelines so developers have been allowed to write their own. This appears to be part of a strategy to diminish the voice of local communities and let wealthy developers bulldoze and concrete over local neighbourhoods and green spaces increasingly at will.”Reed said it was a harbinger of the “anti-democratic planning reforms” the government proposed earlier this month, which could fast-track development without a requirement for detailed planning consent.Councils usually pay for and draw up SPDs to provide guidance for what developers will be allowed to do. Councils said that plans drawn up using developer cash must still be meet wider planning rules. They are a material consideration in planning decisions.“It is often said that ‘he who pays the piper calls the tune,’” said Steve Goodrich, a senior research manager at Transparency International UK. “Any planning guidance developed which then contributes to council policy should be drafted in the public interest, not that of landowners and developers. Accepting payments for this work from those with a clear financial interest in the outcome risks exposing the authors to heavy and undue influence.”Barnet council also received £140,000 from the development company Joseph & Partners to draft a strategy for the renewal of North Finchley town centre. It then entered into a partnership agreement with the firm. The planning document included a proposal to demolish an art deco shopping arcade and replace it with an 12-storey apartment building. Campaigners including Dave Davies, the Kinks guitarist who used to buy guitar strings at the arcade in the 1960s, are opposing the scheme.Jonathan Joseph, the head of Joseph & Partners, denied there was any conflict of interest. “If and when any proposals do come forward for North Finchley, a full consultation and engagement process will be undertaken,” he said.Barnet denied the arrangements gave developers the role of poacher and gamekeeper. An SPD cannot be in conflict with wider planning policies in the borough, it said.Notting Hill Genesis stressed that Barnet “retained responsibility for final decision-making both on the SPD and subsequent planning decisions” for Grahame Park.On the Greenwich peninsula, the landowner Scotia Gas Networks (SGN) paid the council almost £30,000 for a planning brief for a gas-holder site. The brief concluded the area could accommodate high-rise buildings including as many as 1,200 homes, offices, a hotel, shops and restaurants.The council cited “a decade of government cuts” as a reason for needing to accept the funds, but said the landowner had no unfair influence over the planning brief.Dan Brown, a spokesman for SGN, said: “We had no role in producing the planning brief and the brief does not necessarily reflect the most favourable possible outcome for us.”In Hounslow, the MoD’s property arm spent £20,000 to fund supplementary planning guidance for its 18th century cavalry barracks, which it plans to sell as a site for 1,000 new homes. When Hounslow formally adopted a version of the planning strategy drawn up by the Defence Infrastructure Organisation, it made clear it “will be a material planning consideration in the determination of future planning applications”. Some local campaigners who oppose the plan say it amounts to “over-development” and want the buildings turned into a military museum.“The draft planning brief underwent full public consultation,” said Lily Bath, the deputy leader of Hounslow council. “The brief is in no way a guarantee for planning permission, but provides a framework for consideration of future planning applications.”An MoD spokesperson said it works “collaboratively with councils to draft guidance that ensure a quicker, and more cost efficient process for planning, design and development.”

Vanessa Smith ● 1819d0 Comments ● 1819d

Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club

Some readers may have read the very sad and alarming news that the bowling green at Gunnersbury Park is to be "repurposed" as a putting green (also known as a crazy golf course).Much has changed since the incorporation of the Community Interest Company (CIC) in 2015. In that year, as part of a leisure strategy for the Park, it was stated that "the location of the bowls club and its green is seen as a positive to the scheme in terms of development of the club, membership and participation. For example use of the sports hall for indoor short matt bowls and general increase in footfall to the site. The councils have met with the bowls club committee and will continue to work together in developing these proposals."There is no question that the CIC faces formidable financial challenges, greatly exacerbated by the Covid crisis and by the fire at the cafe. However other significant problems, including the one year delay in the completion of the Sports Hub, appear to be due to poor project management rather than to bad luck.The CIC is a not-for-profit community interest company set up to manage Gunnersbury Park and Museum. The CIC is managed by a board of 6 people, supported by an executive arm comprising the CEO and other salaried staff. Amongst other things a CIC is statutorily responsible for ensuring that the company is run in a way that satisfies the community interest test. In practice, this means that it may be required to give more weight to the interests of the community than to financial returns although, like any other company, it is required to remain solvent. A matter of very significant public concern is the "democratic deficit" which characterises the CIC's activities. This is manifested in a lack of transparency, accountabilty, and reluctance to engage with the community. For example, the CIC publishes no lists of meeting dates, agendas, minutes, or agreed action points.This latest announcement by the CIC presages the wanton destruction of a precious community facility which was founded in 1931 and which could still be reinstated. It is clear that the CIC is bent on the cynical engineering of a situation whereby they hope that a planning permission for a cafe/restaurant at the bowling club pavilion will be be granted in due course.Descriptions of events over recent years have been characterised by misunderstandings, blatant misinformation and, like any other sports club, some internal dissension. At the end of its life the Bowling Club had 25 members, of which 22 were active. The Club was fully aware of the need to grow its membership, of all ages. To this end, the CIC were approached and a strategy was presented to them. A 2-year plan, allowing for completion of the new Sports Hub building, then 1 year exposure to all the visitors to the Hub, and then 1 year of open days and free training and associated publicity. It was felt that as a result the membership could easily be raised to 60 or more particularly as there were positive signs of a revival in the sport.The CIC rejected the plan out of hand.The club was given notice to quit the site by 9 January 2020. The CIC had reneged on an agreed extension of the Licence to Occupy and thereby forced the departure of the bowls club. All of those involved in the CIC's decision should hang their heads in shame. Brentford Voice wishes to do all in its very limited power to rescue the situation. To that end we would welcome any comments, suggestions, and expressions of support.Please post your replies on this Forum or send an email to info@brentfordvoice.co.uk

Jim Storrar ● 1832d12 Comments ● 1829d

Building over dropped kerb at end of York Rd :-(

Hi Brentfordians -Last week the new Shepherd's Bush Housing / Bugler development of flats at the end of York Rd (what used to be the New Inn pub) built over what was a dropped kerb - which formed part of the turning circle at the end of the street.This is very annoying and means we can't turn cars around easily / safely any more in what is a fairly long / narrow + increasingly congested cul-de-sac.  It won't just affect residents - but also visitors (deliveries, post, milk, bins etc) and emergency services wanting to get in + out of the street.I tried to see if this was within Shepherd's Bush Housing Planning Application / Consent (Planning Ref. 01244/AB/P10)- and from all that I can read online in the Hounslow planning files, it doesn't seem to be.  The Planning drawings all show the dropped kerb intact and not modified, and as far as I can recall/tell there was no neighbour consultation on this change from Planning drawing details.So I am wondering if this might be an 'illegal' development / infringement, and if there might be any grounds / avenue to have it restored..I've tried tweeting Hounslow / Shepherd's Bush / Bugler for a response - but nothing.  Have just logged a 'Planning infringement' thing with Hounslow in the hope they are obliged to formally respond.If anyone's got any better advice on how to check the official status / legality of this, or even speak directly to planning folks, I'd be interested to hear.Many thanks, Tony (York Rd)

Tony Griffiths ● 3029d15 Comments ● 1837d

Information

Requesting Hounslow Councillor's case figures for municipal year of 2019/2020.  Please detail by ward and councillors. The information listed below shows casework numbers as recorded on our systems.  Councillors receive and act on many other issues which aren't recorded on our own systems either because they take them up direct with officers by phone, email, and in meetings, or help the resident/business solve them without the need for additional council intervention, or because they are outside council responsibilities.  Those outside council responsibilities might be issues raised with police, TfL, business owners or be about, for example, parks not owned/managed by the council.  In addition, responding to queries about planning applications is not recorded as casework.   CouncillorVolumesWardCouncillor Aqsa Ahmed34Feltham NorthCouncillor Javed Akhunzada63BedfontCouncillor Candice Atterton15HanworthCouncillor Harleen Atwal Hear48Heston CentralCouncillor Patrick Barr63Chiswick HomefieldsCouncillor Lily Bath70Heston WestCouncillor Joanna Biddolph249Turnham GreenCouncillor Tom Bruce301Hounslow SouthCouncillor Samia Chaudhary80HanworthCouncillor Komal Chaudri58Feltham NorthCouncillor Unsa Chaudri64Osterley & Spring GroveCouncillor Bandna Chopra65Hounslow WestCouncillor Mel Collins119BrentfordCouncillor Steve Curran636SyonCouncilor Theo Dennison13SyonCouncillor Michael Denniss6Chiswick RiversideCouncillor Sukhbir Singh Dhaliwal42CranfordCouncillor Poonam Dhillon1CranfordCouncillor Katherine Dunne60SyonCouncillor Richard Eason174Osterley & Spring GroveCouncillor Richard Foote41HanworthCouncillor Adriana Gheorghe225BedfontCouncillor Gabriella Giles28Chiswick RiversideCouncillor Ranjit Gill158Turnham GreenCouncillor Ajmer Grewal90Hounslow CentralCouncillor Pritam Grewal163Hounslow CentralCouncillor Puneet Grewal10Hanworth ParkCouncillor Shivraj Grewal53Heston CentralCouncillor Vickram Grewal78Hounslow HeathCouncillor Bishnu Bahadur Gurung90Hanworth ParkCouncillor Sam Hearn157Chiswick RiversideCouncillor Kamaljit Kaur0Heston EastCouncillor Hanif Khan75Hanworth ParkCouncillor Hina Kiani1Hounslow HeathCouncillor Afzaal Kiani28Hounslow HeathCouncillor Gurmail Lal43Heston EastCouncillor Guy Lambert338BrentfordCouncillor Tony Louki685Osterley & Spring GroveCouncillor Khulique Malik135CranfordCouncillor Nisar Malik13Hounslow CentralCouncillor Amritpal Mann33Heston EastCouncillor Gerald McGregor48Chiswick HomefieldsCouncillor Shaida Mehrban66Hounslow SouthCouncillor Hina Mir8Feltham WestCouncillor Alan Mitchell61Feltham WestCouncillor Ron Mushiso86Turnham GreenCouncillor Surinder Purewal40Heston CentralCouncllor Shantanu Rajawat49Heston WestCouncillor Daanish Saeed47IsleworthCouncillor Sue Sampson80IsleworthCouncillor Balraj Sarai*0Heston WestCouncillor Salman Shaheen105IsleworthCouncillor Jagdish Sharma2Hounslow WestCouncillor Raghwinder Siddhu191BedfontCouncillor Corinna Smart29BrentfordCouncillor Karen Smith795Hounslow SouthCouncillor Sohan Sumra28Hounslow WestCouncillor Kuldeep Tak*16Feltham NorthCouncillor John Todd399Chiswick HomefieldsCouncillor Mohammed Umair30Feltham West

Vanessa Smith ● 1840d2 Comments ● 1840d

The truth re Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club

It is important for people to know the truth, not CIC propaganda, so here is a rebuttal of some points in Cllr Lambert's statement re the club:'the bowls club has been wound up by the members/committee' - trying to make it sound as if it was our decision; in fact it was forced upon us by the CIC who ordered us to be out by Jan 2020'it had 22 members of whom 12 were active' - there was in fact a petition signed by 21 playing members who wanted the club to be allowed to continue'They maintained the green themselves with some help from Capel Manor' - the vast majority of the work was carried out by the members; there was occasionally some help from Capel Manor students who in exchange benefited from learning greenkeeping skills'the lease called for them to maintain the clubhouse, however the CIC stepped in to do so at times at a cost of around £2 per annum' - three longstanding members say they have no idea where this claim came from; there was no regular contribution from the CIC; in fact no one can remember any contribution except something to do with some fire alarm/equipment'they believed membership would grow after the delayed sports hub was completed but the development is many months late' - CIC should have kept a proper check on working practices and the (lack of) progress. The delays were not our fault, so couldn't the CIC have waited a few months longer to give us a chance to grow the membership?'Most of the bowlers have moved on to other clubs or retired' - not because we wanted to, but forced to retire in the case of those of us without cars who want to respect the instruction not to travel on public transport unnecessarily'It's not clear there would be anyone to fix the green' - a number of volunteers have offered to do so. Before the club was kicked out Capel Manor offered to take over the green maintenance provided the club was allowed to remain there. The CIC wouldn't even consider it.'The CIC is supposed to grow the use of the park' - how does killing off one of its longest-established activities contribute to that? Why could no other place in the park be considered for the pitch and putt so both activities could have co-existed?'pitch and putt mooted to attract 3000 players per year' - apart from the wildly optimistic numbers, if golf is so important to the park, why was the previous pitch and putt eliminated rather than relocated?

Bela Cunha ● 1847d24 Comments ● 1840d

Network Management Duty Guidance

Network management duty guidanceThis guidance is additional statutory guidance issued by the Secretary of State for Transport under Section 18 of the Traffic Management Act 2004 (“the act”).It applies to all highway authorities in England, who shall have regard to this guidance to deliver their network management duty under the act. It is effective from the date of publication.It does not replace the original Network Management Duty Guidance published in November 2004, but provides additional advice on techniques for managing roads to deal with COVID-19 response related issues. It will be reviewed 3 months after publication.The guidance sets out high-level principles to help local authorities to manage their roads and what actions they should take. Updates to this document or further guidance on related subjects may be published as the need is identified.Reallocating road space: measuresLocal authorities in areas with high levels of public transport use should take measures to reallocate road space to people walking and cycling, both to encourage active travel and to enable social distancing during restart (social distancing in this context primarily refers to the need for people to stay 2 metres apart where possible when outdoors). Local authorities where public transport use is low should be considering all possible measures.Measures should be taken as swiftly as possible, and in any event within weeks, given the urgent need to change travel habits before the restart takes full effect.None of these measures are new – they are interventions that are a standard part of the traffic management toolkit, but a step-change in their roll-out is needed to ensure a green restart. They include:Installing ‘pop-up’ cycle facilities with a minimum level of physical separation from volume traffic; for example, mandatory cycle lanes, using light segregation features such as flexible plastic wands; or quickly converting traffic lanes into temporary cycle lanes (suspending parking bays where necessary); widening existing cycle lanes to enable cyclists to maintain distancing. Facilities should be segregated as far as possible, i.e. with physical measures separating cyclists and other traffic. Lanes indicated by road markings only are very unlikely to be sufficient to deliver the level of change needed, especially in the longer term.Using cones and barriers: to widen footways along lengths of road, particularly outside shops and transport hubs; to provide more space at bus stops to allow people to queue and socially distance; to widen pedestrian refuges and crossings (both formal and informal) to enable people to cross roads safely and at a distance.Encouraging walking and cycling to school, for example through the introduction of more ‘school streets’. Pioneered in London, these are areas around schools where motor traffic is restricted at pick-up and drop-off times, during term-time. They can be effective in encouraging more walking and cycling, particularly where good facilities exist on routes to the school and where the parents, children and school are involved as part of the scheme development.Reducing speed limits: 20mph speed limits are being more widely adopted as an appropriate speed limit for residential roads, and many through streets in built-up areas. 20mph limits alone will not be sufficient to meet the needs of active travel, but in association with other measures, reducing the speed limit can provide a more attractive and safer environment for walking and cycling.Introducing pedestrian and cycle zones: restricting access for motor vehicles at certain times (or at all times) to specific streets, or networks of streets, particularly town centres and high streets. This will enable active travel but also social distancing in places where people are likely to gather.Modal filters (also known as filtered permeability); closing roads to motor traffic, for example by using planters or large barriers. Often used in residential areas, this can create neighbourhoods that are low-traffic or traffic free, creating a more pleasant environment that encourages people to walk and cycle, and improving safety.Providing additional cycle parking facilities at key locations, such as outside stations and in high streets, to accommodate an increase in cycling, for example by repurposing parking bays to accommodate cycle racks.Changes to junction design to accommodate more cyclists – for example, extending Advanced Stop Lines at traffic lights to the maximum permitted depth of 7.5 metres where possible.‘Whole-route’ approaches to create corridors for buses, cycles and access only on key routes into town and city centres.Identifying and bringing forward permanent schemes already planned, for example under Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans, and that can be constructed relatively quickly.Other considerationsAll these measures can be introduced temporarily, either in isolation or as a combined package of measures. Some interventions, including new lightly-segregated cycle lanes, will not require Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs). Others will require TROs, of which there are different types. The main ones are:Permanent: this process includes prior consultation on the proposed scheme design, a 21-day notice period for statutory consultees and others who can log objections; there can be a public inquiry in some circumstances.Experimental: these are used to trial schemes that may then be made permanent. Authorities may put in place monitoring arrangements, and carry out ongoing consultation once the measure is built. Although the initial implementation period can be quick, the need for extra monitoring and consultation afterwards makes them a more onerous process overall.Temporary: these can be in place for up to 18 months. There is a 7-day notice period prior to making the TRO and a 14-day notification requirement after it is made, plus publicity requirements. These are most suitable for putting in place temporary measures and road closures.Emergency legislation came into force on 23 May 2020 to amend, temporarily, the:The Road Traffic (Temporary Restrictions) Procedure Regulations 1992The Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996The Secretary of State’s Traffic Order (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1990The amendments speed up making emergency Traffic Orders that may be needed to, for example, widen pavements or install cycle lanes. The main change is to the means of advertising the order, which can be via digital means. A second order still needs to be published for information 14 days later in a newspaper, where these are available, or via digital media.The amendments also allow, for non-emergency Orders, alternative publicity arrangements to help deal with some practical difficulties that have arisen as a result of restrictions that are in place. For example, these might be where local newspapers have closed or have moved publications on-line or local authority offices are closed to the public, and there are concerns about the safety of staff posting site notices in some circumstances. The amendments will cease to have effect as of 30 April 2021.Traffic signs may be needed to inform pedestrians, cyclists and drivers of changes to road layouts, particularly where temporary widening is in place. Advice on using existing signing, and some new temporary designs, will be published alongside this guidance. These are covered by the provisions of the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 and as such do not need special signs authorisation from the department.Authorities should monitor and evaluate any temporary measures they install, with a view to making them permanent, and embedding a long-term shift to active travel as we move from restart to recovery.Access will still be required for other activities in the road, particularly street works, maintenance and other highway works, which will need to be balanced with work to reallocate road space to active travel. Street works and maintenance activity should carry on, as they will be essential to getting the economy going again. Use of the Street Manager digital service will help to plan and co-ordinate works.Depending on the measures they are installing, authorities will also need to consider access for Blue Badge holders, deliveries and other essential services as appropriate.Authorities should seek input from stakeholders during the design phase. They should consult with the local chiefs of police and emergency services to ensure access is maintained where needed, for example to roads that are closed to motor traffic. Local businesses, including those temporarily closed, should be consulted to ensure proposals meet their needs when they re-open. Kerbside access should be enabled wherever possible for deliveries and servicing.The public sector equality duty still applies, and in making any changes to their road networks, authorities must consider the needs of disabled people and those with other protected characteristics. Accessibility requirements apply to temporary measures as they do to permanent ones.

Bernard Allen ● 1856d0 Comments ● 1856d

Black Lives Matter peaceful socially distanced protest.

https://www.facebook.com/events/577516463202681/Sunday at 1:30 PM – 5:30 PM13–22°C Partly CloudyBrentford MarketMarket Place, TW8 8AH BrentfordJoin us on Sunday 28th June 1.30pm as we hold a peaceful protest with social distancing to continue to show solidarity with protesters against racism and demand racial justice globally. This is a family - friendly peaceful protest with a welcoming atmosphere and music. Please bring your beautiful artwork and banners. We will stand in line with social distancing rules on the wide pavements along side Virdict all the way up to Goddard's on Brentford high street. We should have enough room to make 2 lines, as well as the open space in Brentford Market. Meeting point:- Brentford Market at 1.30pm, then proceed to line up. AIM:- Kneel for George Floyd and the countless before him at 2pm. Chant the UK names of preventable lives lost:- Stephen Lawrence, Mark Duggan,Joy Gardner, Sara Reed Raise awareness with drivers and people passing, by encouraging then to honk their horns. It would be advisable to write slogans such as: Honk for Justice/Silence is Violence. Open Mic to share: Experiences, thoughts , art and anything related to facing discrimination all people of colour face. There will be a few minutes for each speaker to allow everyone to be heard. Once all have spoken the floor will be open to speak for longer. (Hoping to get a Community Leader Speaker) 2.30pm. Please bring a bag to put your rubbish in. Looking for:- Speakers for music Volunteers to be stewards of chanting and facilitating social distancing Ideas on how to make it better for everyone Please remember : Remain peaceful IF YOU HAVE SYMPTOMS PLEASE DO NOT ATTEND! Bring protective masks and gloves, and if possible wet-wipes or anti-bacteri gel Observe 2 metres social distancing guidelines Pack food and water Bring identification and emergency contact information Wear comfortable shoes Carry essential items like your medication or inhaler Women on periods are advised to wear pads instead of tampons incase toilet access is restricted Look forward to seeing you at the event!!!

Anil Patel ● 1882d26 Comments ● 1864d

Mobile Testing Unit for coronavirus

FOR ACTION: COMMUNICATIONS FOR CIRCULATION TO ALL RESIDENTS    Hi all,    Hounslow will be hosting a Mobile Testing Unit for coronavirus testing for residents at Grasshoppers' Rugby Club, Osterley, on Monday 29th June and Tuesday 30th June 2020.    Mobile Testing Units are an essential part of the national testing programme as they offer pedestrian appointments as well as drive-through appointments.    You must register via the gov.uk portal before attending a mobile testing unit and bring your 16-digit code or appointment confirmation with you on your mobile phone.    Testing site location: Grasshoppers Rugby Club Syon Ln Osterley Isleworth  TW7 5PN   Criteria for testing:  Anyone over the age of 5 who is symptomatic is now able to receive a test at one of the testing centres. You should be within the first 5 days of symptoms when you have your test, as otherwise it is not effective.    Coronavirus symptoms are:     • a high temperature     • a new, continuous cough     • a loss of or change to your sense of smell or taste   This test can tell you if you have coronavirus at the time the swab sample is taken. The test to tell if you’ve ever had coronavirus (‘antibody test’) is not available yet.   Book an appointment: Appointments are open for both Monday and Tuesday  at Grasshoppers' Mobile Testing Unit from 8pm on Saturday 27th June via the nhs.uk link:  https://www.nhs.uk/ask-for-a-coronavirus-test    If you would like a pedestrian appointment at the Mobile Testing Unit, please put “unknown” in the box requiring your vehicle registration number. This should allow you to continue the booking process.    If you have any problems refer to the helpline detailed below, or you can use the 16-digit authorisation code that is sent you via SMS and go to the testing centre anytime on foot or in a car between 10.30 and 15.30 where local authority staff will help you.    The testing centre will be operating between 10.30-15.30 on both Monday and Tuesday.     Alternative testing provision Please note that if an appointment is not available at the Grasshoppers’ site, then the same testing criteria apply for bookings at the Twickenham testing site and they operate 7 days a week. They do however only offer drive-in appointments.   There are also home testing kits available, bookable via the same website: https://www.nhs.uk/ask-for-a-coronavirus-test     Questions or problems If anyone has any problems booking via the portal, please contact the National Coronavirus Testing Helpline on 0300 303 2713    Capacity for testing is limited so is released on an hourly basis; it is recommended to try at regular intervals to access an appointment.    If you are displaying coronavirus symptoms you must self-isolate for one week from the start of the symptoms, and members of your household should isolate for two weeks from the start of your symptoms. If you are showing symptoms.    If you have any questions about testing, please contact publichealth@hounslow.gov.uk 

Bernard Allen ● 1877d2 Comments ● 1876d

A message from Cllr Steve Curran, Cllr Lily Bath and Cllr Katherine Dunne

I received an email on 12th June from these Councillors.  "we stand with the millions of people around the world who are saying loud and clear that Black Lives Matter"The capitalization leads one to infer they are referring to the organisation as well as the sentiment. https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/ The BLM website makes it clear that this organisation has objectives beyond seeking justice for all people regardless race, for example:"We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."For those in the know, this reeks of cultural Marxism, the program to destroy Western civilisation through systematic attacks on its values and institutions.I ask the senders of this email - are you comfortable with disrupting the "Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement"?I see no condemnation of the vandalizing of our public monuments that occurred during the weekend of 6/7th June, instead "We support the Mayor of London’s Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm to review the city's murals, street art, street names, statues and other memorials. We will fully participate in this review and take appropriate action when it is concluded." - so they are proposing to spend my taxes on a ridiculous exercise: at best virtue signalling, at worst an erasure of elements of British history for ideological reasons.BLM is objectively a racist organisation using tactics from Mao's cultural revolution, Pol Pot's Year Zero and Stalin's Soviet Union.  Objectively it also works to support the interests of the global elites by dividing workers.I fear Labour is a lost cause having been taken over by Marxist activists - are there any Labour voices left who have the courage to stand up to this?

Andy Riley ● 1886d17 Comments ● 1878d

Hancock's testing regime................

t really does get worse as Hancock has hired private firms to run the drive through testing sites rather than increase the NHs's own capacity, thereby rewarding friends of the Tory Party.The DoH failed to tell 'Private Eye' who these were so they did their detective work.Deloitte manages the process - operations on the ground are performed by a range of privatisers. One is Mitie - a former Tory leader of Westminster council - Baroness Couttie a mate of David Cameron is a board member and advised Dodgy Dave on 'public sector efficiency'. Mitie boast openly that the Baroness is a Conservative Whip.Next up - Compass - through its sports event subsidiary Levy. Their Chairman, Paul Walsh, was one of the business leaders who signed a 'vote Tory' letter ahead of the 2015 election.Then comes Serco who appointed Rupert Soames as Chief Executive in 2014, he is grandson of Winston Churchill and also brother in law of Tory MP Philip Dunne.One reader of Eye working at a site says temp. staff managed by outsourced contractors are showing 'shocking' standards of PPE awareness.  Boots supplied core testing staff for the first drive through centres many with clinical experience and all trained by pharmacists. However, then Sodexo was called in to supply both testing and training staff without medical experience. The reader said that on their site some testers will be trained by 'a Sodexo trainer, who only has to have actually performed three swab tests themselves to qualify as a trainer'.

Vanessa Smith ● 1914d12 Comments ● 1913d

Cure worse than the disease?

There is increasing discussion online and in the media regarding the "exit strategy".  At one extreme we could lift all restrictions soon and accept that the NHS may be swamped and that a lot of vulnerable people will die.  At the other extreme we continue with the lockdown restrictions until we have completed the NHS capacity ramp up, have sufficient antibody and antigen tests and have better data about prevalence, morbidity etc. There are costs associated with each strategy. Understandably, the stories of suffering and deaths dominate the headlines. But we know that there will be significant and increasing problems as the lockdown continues.  Business failing, unemployment rising, poverty increasing, childrens' education disrupted, mental health problems, domestic violence, breakdown of social order to list the obvious ones.There has been a remarkable consensus so far about the need to follow the government's instructions, perhaps because of the perceived authority of the scientific advisers.  But there is a fallacy in taking their advice as final. They are epidemiologists, virologists, clinicians etc. so they will tend to see problems from the perspective of their specialty. Ultimately this has to be a decision taken by us all collectively (no, I'm not talking about a referendum, I mean via our representatives locally and nationally, the media, and forums like this).I get the impression that the experts are still not in a position to give a timescale, so the lockdown seems to be open ended. Clearly this cannot continue for much longer.  Should we move to the Swedish model of a lighter approach? Should we set a deadline for easing restrictions?

Andy Riley ● 1960d24 Comments ● 1927d

GOOD NEWS.

Although we are going through a worldwide crisis, possibly never known so bad in human history, things are going to get better. The Bible promises: "And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away." ( Revelation 21 v 4.) At present the whole world is going through a period known as the "last days" of a system that is about to be put right.2 Timothy 3:1-5 New International Version (NIV) says:(1)"But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. (2) People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, (3) without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, (4) treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— (5) having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people."Is that a huge coincindence or is that an apt description of how many people in the world are today?Luke 21:10-11 New International Version (NIV) states:10 Then he (Jesus) said to them: “Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. 11 There will be great earthquakes, famines and pestilences in various places, and fearful events........"What is happening worldwide surely qualifies as seeing fulfillment today.This is the storm before the calm.“ALL creation keeps on groaning together and being in pain together until now.” So said the apostle Paul. (Romans 8:22) Despite advances in medical science, sickness and death continue to plague the human race. How wonderful, then, the promise that climaxes this part of Isaiah’s prophecy! Imagine the time when “no resident will say: ‘I am sick.’” (Isaiah 33:24)

Neil Milkins ● 1974d11 Comments ● 1973d

If you are self employed or a sole trader/operator

Many self employed are finding all their bookings and contracts being cancelled or postponed indefinitely.  Worse still many are having invoiced payments deferred using Coronavirus as justification.Many of these larger companies will be receiving help and directors may well be keeping their huge salaries and bonuses.There are several petitions to help long term self employed who pay Tax and NI in full but do not get any assistance that people in PAYE get.Govt on TV today stated Local Authorities have a remit to help but both Govt and Local council websites are full of hot air and no actual proper contact or pragmatic adviceHowever The House of Commons are asking for specific questions from this quite large sector of society so, as forwarded to me from others and asked to circulate and forward for others for whom this maybe a worrying concern.  Please copy and forward to anyone who may be in this vacuum“Include self-employed in statutory sick pay during Coronavirus”:https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/300336As the result of the large numbers of petitions and signatures we've received on coronavirus, we will be putting your concerns and questions directly to the Government at an evidence session (a question and answer session with representatives from the Government) in the coming days.Tell us what question(s) you'd like us to the ask the Government and experts in this short survey: https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/petitionscommittee/We'll email you again to let you know more about the session, including when it's going to happen, who'll be taking part and how you can watch it live.We will also email you a link to the video and a transcript of the session afterwards.Who are we?We are the House of Commons Petitions Committee. We are a cross-party group of MPs that looks at e-petitions submitted on petition.parliament.uk. We are independent from Government. You can find out more about us and our work on our website: http://www.parliament.uk/petitions-committee/role

Raymond Havelock ● 1978d0 Comments ● 1978d

And still it goes on...........

You may remember the sorry saga of trying to help my elderly neighbours 'downsize' from a 3 bed house to a flat in a sheltered unit that was beset by so many problems you really couldn't have made it up. This started in November 2017 they were told to get ready and start packing up last April and then left living out of boxes for months on end while Hounslow faffed with converting previous staff accomodation in the sheltered unit into two more flats. Although Hounslow did eventually help them with storage and getting a cooker that they'd removed - still they sit waiting.First of all it was questions over building regs. and the consultant that had been in charge (consultant really?) then it was questions over fire regs. These of course are both important and vital areas that have to be right - but how long can this possibly take? So from last April when they were told to get ready to move until now, all there has been is excuse after excuse.Elected members have been found wanting, and only one housing officer was of practical help as far as she was able. This is a disgraceful state of affairs, how can a local authority not convert two flats in a sheltered unit in over a year? Hounslow claim they are desperate for family houses - this would free up one, and there's been another empty in the next road since before Christmas, wouldn't you think that some sort of urgency in utilising their scarce properties would filter through somewhere?This is an absolute scandal, not only leaving elderly people in limbo for over a year but failing people who are waiting for a family home. Useless.

Vanessa Smith ● 2401d76 Comments ● 2025d

Hounslow Council

Somewhat naively I assumed I could call the Council Tax number (020 8583 4242) as given on the Hounslow website and speak to an actual employee in the department just to query some issues. I was dealt with an individual from the outsourcing company which Hounslow has contracted to deal with Council Tax. The person I spoke to advised me to go online. I said I cannot find my issue online, and suggested I do not really have the ability to be so technically efficient. Astonishingly she said that "this is 2020 and everything is done online now" and I "should get into the modern world" and went further to ask if I "knew anyone who could assist me that might be more computer literate?" I was somewhat peeved with the implication that I didn't know what year it was! More so that she considered me incompetent. I asked if there was an alternative method. She said I could write a letter to the council (which seems like a retrograde step) or visit the Council Offices in person. I asked for the address. She could only tell me that it was in Bath Road.I asked her if she was actually in the premises? No, she works for the outsourcing company and can only give advice. She was not a Council employee.I have lived in this borough for nearly 40 years. I cannot recall an incidence when I could not call someone at the Civic Centre (when it was in Lampton Road) and speak to someone in it. Times have indeed changed. I have never been particularly impressed with Hounslow Council over those years - but I sincerely worry about their operational methods and detachment to their residents today.

Paul Brownlee ● 2047d6 Comments ● 2045d

Boston Manor Park

So following on from my email and pictures to junction2I got back this...Hello Helen, Please see the attached poster that is up at Boston Manor Park regarding the rectification works taking place after the Junction 2 event. We understand that there has been significantly more damage done to the park that previous years. And those who attended the Friday, Saturday or Sunday events will know that the park was not in this condition at those times. The extreme amount of rainfall that we have had this week has severely impacted the plans for the de-rig of the event. We took all available precautions, and discussed them with the council. The rain was so significant on Monday that we had to halt works on site in the afternoon, as there was an amber warning issued by the Met office at 3pm, stating ‘danger to life’ due to flood water. Unfortunately we need to have a period of dry weather for any works to be undertaken, otherwise any activity will cause further damage. The weather has also delayed our de-rig in some areas of the park. We can take some measures regarding the paths, and have contracted a road sweeper machine to clean the public paths today, and to continue to do this when all vehicles have pulled off, and the rain has (hopefully) stopped next week. I have attended the park today and removed the items that were left behind (the metal clamps and wooden boards in your picture). We understand that the damage at the moment looks like it will take a long time to repair, however we have been assured by the professional grounds maintenance company that we employ that this can be rectified reasonably quickly by taking simple steps. Once the ground is drier we will be smoothing the ruts caused by vehicle movement, and reseeding the grass. Please rest assured that we are being proactive in dealing with this, and take the condition of the park very seriously. We will be addressing the works as a matter of urgency once the ground is in a suitable state. We will be readdressing our wet weather provisions for future years. Thank you for your patience and understanding with this matter. AliceAnd this is poster BOSTON MANOR PARK RECTIFICATION WORKS JUNE 2019 Due to the unprecedented amount of rainfall during the de-rig period of the recent Junction 2 events, there has been some unforeseen damage as the vehicles have pulled off the park. The council have been working throughout with the event organisers to minimise the damage and rectify it as soon as possible. Before any works can be done to the damaged ground, we need to wait for the ground to dry. After this we will agree the necessary programme of works and undertake it as quickly as possible to return the park to full health. We have already added some extra woodchip to the paths in the wooded areas. After this we will look closer at the areas that may require further treatment.  We are also getting a road sweeper in to clean all tarmac paths once the rain has stopped and the vehicles are off site.

Helen Dickinson ● 2256d9 Comments ● 2054d

New Syon Park exit road

NEW EXIT ROAD PROPOSED FOR SYON PARK. FOLLOWS CLOSURE OF THE GARDEN CENTRE AND CHURCH STREET, AND DELAYS TO TRAFFIC INCLUDING TO THE ENCHANTED WOODLANDS. It will "provide the opportunity for the re-use of the garden centre and provide new employment opportunities."The planning application has just been filed with Hounslow Council. It states:Given the recent closure of Wyevale Garden Centre, Northumberland Estates are seeking to secure the long-term future of Syon Park, and the proposed link road is part of the wider strategy to ensure that Syon Park remains an attractive and sustainable location for new businesses and operators to occupy the now vacant garden centre.1.3  Recent changes to the surrounding highway network, particularly the closure of Church Street, have had an impact on the access and operation of Syon Park. The closure of Church Street had negatively impacted the number of visitors to Wyevale Garden Centre prior to its closure, as well as contributing towards increased travel times for visitors accessing Syon Park and Hotel.1.4  The closure of Church Street has required all traffic to travel via alternative routes (for example the Park Road/Twickenham Road and Busch Corner junctions). This change to the highway network has resulted in visitors to and from Syon Park experiencing significant journey times, with a direct result on business patronage and the long-term sustainability of Syon Park as a key visitor, leisure, and business destination.1.5  A recent example of this includes Syon Park’s annual Enchanted Woodland event, which was negatively affected by the surrounding highway network. The Park Road/Twickenham Road was subjected to three-way traffic lights which resulted in significant delays for visitors to the event, with many visitors taking up to two hours leaving Syon Park. The proposed London Road egress would have significantly alleviated this situation and allowed visitors to leave Syon Park without delay, also negating the need for two-way traffic along Park Road and thus benefiting the entirety of the surrounding highway network.1.6  The latest changes to the surrounding highway network have altered the previous historic arrangement and has effectively reduced Syon Park’s access and egress from two routes, at the Syon Park gates, to just one route along Park Road. The proposed development provides an alternative egress from Syon Park and will redress this position and re-instate the previous long-term highway access that Syon Park has benefited from.1.7  The key benefits of the proposed link road are:Provide the opportunity for the re-use of the garden centre and provide new employment opportunities at Syon Park, with sustainable transport links to the local highway networkEnable a more efficient egress route, particularly for hotel guests travelling via Heathrow Airport, avoiding the congestion of the local highway network, improving the reliability of journey times to Syon ParkA notable improvement to the cycle environment on Park Road as a result of the reduction in trafficReduction in traffic movement at the Park Road/Twickenham Road junction, improving capacity for local residents and cycle accessReduction in traffic at Busch Corner junction with traffic travelling eastbound on London Road able to avoid the junction when leaving the site1.8 Given the above, and the local highway context surrounding Syon Park, it is considered essential to deliver this link road to improve the capacity and access to and from Syon Park, making the site a more attractive and sustainable destination. Furthermore, the link road would have a significant benefit in alleviating traffic flow and over-capacity at other key locations in the local highway network.The development is for a one-way link road connecting Syon Park to the A315 London Road. The link road will be 3m wide, with a 1m service strip. The full stretch of road measures 179m and has been designed to achieve appropriate forward visibility along its full alignment. The road will tie-in to the existing road alignment adjacent to Syon Park Hotel, and a new barrier will be installed at the existing gate egress to London Road, along with new road markings and signage to ensure that the road is used safely and appropriately.The proposed link road has been designed by Caneparo Associates, and can be seen on the ‘Detail Design General Arrangement Plan’. The road has been designed to meander in a parkland style, with soft landscaping either side of the carriageway to soften the edge and provide sustainable drainage, as well as utilising all arisings on-site. A new post and rail fence and hedge is proposed at the new egress to London Road to provide a positive boundary treatment.

Reg Ghosh ● 2071d15 Comments ● 2063d

Consultation on the Isleworth cycleway

Hounslow council are 'consulting' on the above and council officers will be at Isleworth Public Hall Weds. 27 Nov. from 2.00.p.m. - 4.00.p.m.There is considerable disquiet - especially about the part of the cycleway that goes from Worple Rd. across South St. to IPH and beyond. The plan is to divide the pavement by way of a 'kerb' along the middle between pedestrians and cyclists and also to move the bus stop down South St. The reason for this is the nonsense that if two buses are passing there is not enough room, rubbish - as there is a lay by for buses going towards Hounslow to pull into. The new bus stop will only be a 'half stop' which will not afford much shelter for passengers. The conflict between pedestrians and cyclists in several places has been entirely overlooked. The proposed new bus stop will also affect traffic turning out of Worple Rd into South St. and also those wishing to turn into Worple from South St. This 'consultation' is the second attempt to foist this on local people, the first being a recipe for disaster. The 'consultation'on Hounslow's website consists of just one question - Do you agree? Yes - No - Don't know! What an insult - this is a Conservation area, there are NO comments from the Conservation officer, so much for that.Hounslow are desperate to get this thing through by hook or by crook, if you live locally please try and get along to the IPH on the 27th or go on to the website and give your views.https://haveyoursay.hounslow.gov.uk/traffic-and-transport/twickenham-to-brentford-cycleway-revised-proposals/

Vanessa Smith ● 2095d15 Comments ● 2076d

CIC forces closure of Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club

Gunnersbury Park Bowling Club was formed in 1931. When the Community (now, there's a misnomer!) Interest Company took over the running of the Park, bowls club members were assured that CIC valued bowling, wished to see it continue and wanted to discuss ways of increasing use of the green by the general public. What were those assurances worth? Or Hounslow's Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy, with its laudable aims of promoting both, but, in reality, nothing but hot air? Now the sports hall is running massively late and needs more money (were late-finishing penalties not included in the building contract?) and CIC are kicking out the bowls club to replace it with a secret sporting activity to produce revenue. CIC refuse to reveal what the secret activity is or to explain why there is such a need for secrecy. The bowls club did not cost the councils a penny; members looked after everything, including the upkeep of the green. Yet we are the sacrificial lamb, in another example of CIC shortsighted short-termism. We have been told that our site is just right for the new secret activity, but is it really believable that, had there been any goodwill or readiness to look for an alternative, there is nowhere else in the Park that could accommodate it? When/if this venture fails to generate the required revenue and packs up and leaves, the bowling green cannot be restored. Bowling was the one activity in the Park for the older members of the community; the bowling club was where for years we stayed active, socialised with friends and held competitions with other local clubs. All that has been disregarded and summarily thrown away by the autocratic CIC - judge and jury, unaccountable to the community whose interests it's meant to safeguard, not subject to oversight and strangers to transparency.

bela cunha ● 2088d12 Comments ● 2082d

Another loaded consultation, another 'done' deal

Having just taken a look at the 'consultation' on Parking Charges for Gunnersbury park, the level of loaded questions is a disgrace.They are comparing themselves with National Trust and Heritage England venues seemingly deluded that they are as important and attractive as those locations.It is OUR local park, bequeathed in covenant and trust to the people of Ealing, Acton and Brentford.It is funded one way or another through our taxes and yes, for far too long, it has been badly neglected by the ineptness of governance by it's custodians.But what have we now?  Buildings, new facilities, Yes. But way overdue, by a generation.But now, also not terribly affordable to the local populous.I usually cycle there. Take the car if  carting older or younger people or meeting friends and going on somewhere.Still, the the important fundamentals, like the  pathways are still awful making it poor for elderly walkers and toddlers and cyclists.Nor is the park easy to access for a quick visit.But to charge for the car park and justify it by comparing to venues that are not the same and not asking indeed, whether the charges are acceptable in any mode.There is even an inference that disabled badge holders will also be charged.No local residents of either borough over 60 should be charged at all.The car parks is almost deserted during the week. A hourly charge will hit the sports players as most games are 90 mins plus preparation and changing times so thats 2-3 hours.So where is the consultation question off whether to charge at weekends or when events are held?Maybe the cost of this form of managing this park in such a way is to high to be justified.Screwing the local people who support it on top of what all of us pay for whether we use it or not is completely wrong.It is a Public Open space free to use. Parking is part of that.  If it were stuffed full of vehicles 7 days a week and only 4 people in the place then maybe a different matter but it is not.As with Osterley Park which is now near deserted during the week, it now relies on corporate events to keep it's facilities alive. But local people especially the elderly are staying way as these charges left right and centre are not affordable.This is just like a TfL consultation.  Pointless as it is clearly already a done deal with everything in place.Shameful and contemptuous to all local residents of both Boroughs

Raymond Havelock ● 2144d4 Comments ● 2140d

There's none so blind.

There are times when some of our local councillors really do take your breath away. Take for instance the gem in Cllr. Lambert's weekly blog we have been treated to this week in respect of the planning application for The George Inn a Grade 2 listed building and former pub in Isleworth.The very real concerns of local residents dismissed in a couple of throw-away sentences:"Thursday evening was the Planning Committee. It was a packed hall, mainly with supporters of the proposal to turn the listed and unoccupied George pub in Isleworth into what some describe as an Islamic prayer centre and others describe as a mosque. We had had a bit of a preview of this proposal at an area forum meeting last year and I formed a favourable impression. Not much had changed in the meantime. Some locals are worried about traffic and parking impacts but the committee found it hard to see this as a decisive problem. The very urbane local Isleworth councillor Salman Shaheen suggested some conditions to the approval which everybody was happy with, but then we got into an absurd procedural wrangle which caused steam to emit from the ears of one dishonourable member (this one) as we wasted 15 minutes arguing about nothing. Anyway, approved."Leaving aside the 'procedural wrangle' which served to remind us that some people need to do some more homework on committee and planning issues, the detailed objection letter sent to ALL committee members setting out the local amenity society's and a local resident's association was reduced in the officer's report to five sentences.Now we have one of those committee members publicly patronising those same groups, as if we were a bunch of old dears with nothing else to do but have a whinge. As one correspondent e-mailed to me this morning - "he has completely undermined the concerns of local people as if they count for sod all. What chance do we have with pompous gits like him making decisions that will cause so many problems to residents?"Cllr. Lambert we need hardly remind locals around here was one of those same members who voted for the closure of Church St. which in no small way has added to the already congested local roads, and it is a decision that, two years down the line, still reverberates in Isleworth. This latest short-sighted decision will cause even more congestion, pollution and aggravation - but no matter - people who do not live here (apart from one) and care even less about something that will not affect them in the least go on their merry way without a thought for anyone. One day these 'representatives' might learn to listen - or at least try visiting an area before they come to any decision which clearly (apart from one who sees it on a daily basis) they hadn't. All Cllr. Lambert does is add insult to injury - but then we are usually referred to as 'the usual  suspects' - says it all really.

Vanessa Smith ● 2165d7 Comments ● 2144d

Ground Penetrating Radar Scan.

I am a True Crime Writer and Television Investigative Consultant. I have for the past 14 years been researching the horrendous crimes committed by Abertillery-born Harold Jones. In 1921, Jones then aged 15 murdered 2 Abertillery, Wales schoolgirls, Freda Burnell aged 8 and 11 year-old Florence Little. After being released from prison in 1941 Jones served 5 years in the army before settling in Fulham, Putney and finally Hammersmith where he died in 1971. Jones used a number of names during his time in London - first Harold Jones, then Harry Stevens and finally Harry Jones. Research has led myself and many criminal experts to believe that Jones went on to become the serial killer known as the Hammersmith Nudes' Killer (1959-1965.) https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/488557/is-this-man-the-real-jack-the-stripper/These 8 unsolved killings have over the past 11 years been given much media attention. In 2011 a one hour drama documentary titled Fred Dinenage Murder Casebook - Harold Jones -The Welsh Killer has been shown repeatedly on various satellite Channels worldwide. (Google Harold Jones -The Welsh Killer.) This led to a major 90 minute national television documentary which was shown in January and February 2019. (Google Dark Son - The Hunt For A Serial Killer to see trailers.) In the early 1960's Jones using the name Harry Stevens  had lived in Fulham, 2 streets away from 3rd nudes's victim Hannah Tailford. In 1964 and 1965 whilst living in Putney under the name Harry Stevens, he was AT THE SAME TIME occupying a rented house in Hammersmith using the name Harry Jones. This was 2 streets away from 7th nudes victim Frances Brown and 8th nudes' victim Bridget O'Hara. It is my belief that there may be trophies buried in the garden at Hammersmith and the owner has now given me permission to use ground-penetrating radar to detect any such evidence.I am trying to locate someone in the film or media industry or anyone else who would be willing to cover the cost of the scan and record the garden being scanned. (Approximately 70 square metres.)On top of the circumstantial evidence regarding Jones living just 2 streets away from 3 of the murder victims below are a few more startling links.(1) Jones' own daughter has indicated that her father would leave her and her mother at home at the times of the killings and book into Rowton House, a doss house in Hammersmith whenever her parents would have a row. The daughter stated that she now believes her father would do this in fear that he may kill his wife in temper. Jones' own son-in-law stated that "There's no smoke without fire is there?"(2) Bridget O'Hara, the 8th victim was last seen leaving a pub near Rowton House on 11 January 1975 - Jones' birthday.(3) The person believed to be the killer had in 1964 shown one woman (a prostitute) a Metropolitan Police warrant card after she had got into his car. She stated that she felt very uncomfortable and made an excuse to get out of the vehicle. The driver gave her some cash before she got out. I believe the person was Harold Jones who was using the warrant card that had belonged to John Widdows, Jones father-in-law who had died just 2-3 years earlier. Widdows was a former London Metropolitan Police officer. Jones daughter stated that she still possessed her grandfather's retirement clock and Widdows may have possibly kept his warrant card when he retired.(4) At least 4 of the 8 murder victims were stored in a disused electricity sub-station on the Heron Trading Estate in East Acton. This was about 4 miles from Jones' rented property in Hammersmith. Jones daughter claims that her father worked in ACTON at the time of the murders but couldn't or wouldn't reveal which business premises he had worked at.(5) Jones left prison in 1941 after refusing treatment or discussing his crimes with the relevant authorities. The prison authorities noted that Jones, right to the day he was released showed no remorse for his crimes in Wales. Just shortly before his release the prison governor stated: "Sad as it seems, I can see no hopeful prospects for Jones in the future." The prison chaplain described Jones as "a no hoper." And then Jones was released onto an unsuspecting public possibly in the hope he would get killed in Libya where he served 5 years in the army.I am in contact with relatives of 6 of the 8 murder victims and they all (especially adult children of these women) are keen to know the identity of the killer in their lifetime. I am now 67 years old and I would like to know for sure the killer's identify in my lifetime.If anyone would like to come on board with this matter or have any practical suggestions I can be contacted at n.milkin@sky.com or 07989555376. Regards. Neil Milkins.

Neil Milkins ● 2148d3 Comments ● 2146d

PCNs in Enfield Road, Brentford

Over the last few weeks PCNs have been issued to drivers who park outside the controlled hours on the single yellow line which runs from 26 Enfield Rd down towards Eastbourne Rd.  They are being issued because people are, of necessity, parking with 2 wheels on the kerb.It's obvious that if we don't park with 2 wheels on the kerb (in the same way as cars in the marked bays) we risk getting our cars damaged and/or completely blocking the road. The road is just not wide enough to park safely with all 4 wheels on the carriageway. When the CPZ was first implemented (about 6 years ago) I recall having a conversation with the man from the Council who was in charge of organising it all and was assured that kerb parking would be permitted on the single yellow outside the controlled hours.It is only very recently that tickets have been issued. I received a ticket at 8.30pm but most of them seem to have been issued between 11pm and midnight. 5 were issued at about 11.30pm the night before last. People who come home late and can't find anywhere else to park are particularly affected - some might say "targeted".I've raised the issue with Cllr Lambert who is sympathetic but has apparently been unable to get any response from the traffic team.  The bottom line is that if we can't park with 2 wheels on the kerb then we can't park at all and lose parking space for approximately 8 - 10 cars.  If the reality is that we cannot park at all in that location then the signage should make that clear.Could those who've been affected and those who don't want to lose this parking space lobby our Councillors to express their view?  I'm appealing my ticket and am quite prepared to take it to the Adjudicator if necessary.

Alison Robins ● 2150d12 Comments ● 2148d

Scammers - 'Tommy's Gardening Services' - Brook Road South and possibly beyond

My husband was ripped off today by a man offering to take away our garden waste. (I know, I know...)I returned home at about 2.00pm from a meeting in central London to find a man wearing a yellow hi-vis jacket in our front garden, loading bags onto the pavement, presumably for collection. My husband went to a local ATM to withdraw cash, which he gave to the man in return for a business card - Tommy's Gardening Services 07388 268 450. I called a number of times and was reassured that they were coming back - of course, they never showed up. The number is now going straight to answerphone. (Of course, we put the bags back into the front garden, as they were causing an obstruction on the pavement. We also swept up the dead leaves and mess.)I have reported it to the police (they won't be interested) and our neighbours have the man filmed on CCTV. He'd been trying to get a response from an elderly neighbour who had been badly ripped-off some months ago. I'm very glad to report they didn't succeed with her.I know it's the oldest trick in the book and - had I been at home - I'd have no compunction in telling them where to go. Sadly, my husband is a much nicer, more trusting human being. Please, please, please tell all cold-callers to sling their hook. My husband was only ripped-off to the tune of £50, but I still want to find them and cause them actual bodily harm. See, I told you I wasn't nice.

Tracie Dudley Craig ● 2166d15 Comments ● 2155d

Another one bites the dust

Can someone tell me if there's a plan to obliterate every old building in Brentford?O'Riordan's Tavern is to be demolished and replaced with... wait for it... new-build flats. Because, obvs, there's a shortage of those in the area. And, as we all know, they're in very high demand.Is it really beyond the imagination of a developer to take a tired (but pretty) building and give it a little TLC? I realise that it was not viable as a boozer, but I know a couple of people who live in old converted pubs - and they're stunning dwellings. Of course, it's much easier to bulldoze and put up an undistinguished bit of pre-fab horror which will have a shelf-life of - say - 25 years before it'll want tearing down again, but really? That's the best they can do?By and large, the people planning, designing and making decisions about our area don't live in it - it's easy to trash something if you don't have to look at it on a daily basis. And, as I've said before (to deaf ears), it takes a moment to demolish a building, but in that moment years, decades, centuries of history is consigned to the dustbin. What replaces it is very seldom worthy of praise. (Anyone remember a certain D J Trump demolishing the Bonwit Teller building in Manhattan and taking the beautiful bas-relief sculptures with it? It's not a million miles from this.) It still beggars belief that - at the very least - the Barclays and Post Office facades could not have been saved and incorporated into a new development. It's been done before, many times, and successfully too. Significantly, the old Wilson & Kyle building featured in a Guardian article about derelict buildings. I've long said that if it had been located in Shoreditch or Hackney, it would have been refurbished and given a new lease of life as achingly hip flats or workspaces. But here? Too much to ask. Much better employed as a billboard before it's flattened.I'm afraid that some committee's decision to throw around a couple of swimming pools-worth of sky blue paint, picking a funky sans-serif font and labelling something a 'project' does not inspire confidence or engender civic pride. It's patronising. Especially when they construct a watchtower too brutal for even the Korean DMZ, without planning permission - or shame.So now it's goodbye to quirky, pretty little O'Riordans, part of the landscape since 1841 - and hello to... well, more of the same. Lucky us. Lucky, lucky us.

Tracie Dudley Craig ● 2192d56 Comments ● 2171d

Proposals to Refurbish Brentford Towers

I am really glad the LBH have decide to refurbish the Brentford Towers (article on front page) instead of pulling them down as was rumoured a few years ago. They look in a sorry state at the moment and look rather scruffy against the new high rise that have been built next to them.It seems that LBH are embarking on quite an extensive refit, by cladding the outside of the building, replacing the windows, boilers, enclosing balconies and removing hidden asbestos and hopefully creating 17 more flats.My one concern is with the Lease Holders within the tower blocks, they are surly going to have to contribute a share for their flat within the overall upgrade of the building.I hope they don't end up large bills similar to the projects in Sutton and Reading, and are given time to pay, if they have to pay anything at-all, hopefully not.From front pageTwo public engagement events have already happened. The remaining ones take place at the Ground floor meeting room in Cornish House.On Wednesday 17 May, 3-7pm: Residents from 1-88 Boulton House & 1-88 Wicksteed HouseSaturday 20 May, 10am-12pm: Invited residents from neighbouring properties and any residents who are unable to make previous sessions Monday 22 May, 3-7pm: Invited residents from neighbouring properties and any residents who are unable to make previous sessions For more details please email Sukhi Randhawa and comments or queries to Affordable.housing@hounslow.gov.ukThe consultation ends on Monday 5 June 2017

Bernard Allen ● 3014d29 Comments ● 2185d

Ruth Cadbury and Boris Johnson

I am no apologist for our new PM and I have a great respect for our current MP, but I have to correct one of Ms Cadbury's comments ref. Boris Johnson.Mr Johnson's comments concerning what he thought about women wearing the burqa have been repeatedly reported out of context. In the Daily Telegraph article in which the comments were made he was highly derogatory about … the Danish. Yes, the Danish. The Danes had introduced a law banning the wearing of the burqa in public and police had been humiliating Muslim women in public by forcibly removing them. This, Johnson argued, was not the liberal attitude one normally associates with the Danish people. Johnson went on to say that while there was no Quranic requirement to wear the burqa, that he thought the were degrading to women and ridiculous nevertheless if an adult woman wishes to wear a full-face covering in public then she should be able to do so. In short Johnson was arguing against intolerance and in favour of a Muslim woman's right to wear a burqa even (or perhaps especially) when he (i.e. Johnson) personally disagreed.In short he was upholding the maxim: "I disagree with every word you say, but shall fight to the death for your right to say it." That, at least in my mind, is the mark of a true liberal. Now whether Johnson is the right person to lead the country is a moot point and one which I will not comment on, but beware of comments taken out of context.PS the original article was entitled 'Ah, Denmark". I'm sure you can find it on Google, like I did.

John Bradley ● 2214d13 Comments ● 2202d

Nice to know whose side the council is on..................

How long before another planning application appears? Will people in Isleworth be able to rely on the council's support to tell the Duke where he gets off after losing the planning inquiry last October, or will the Supreme Leader and his aristocratic chums work against the peasants? A Labour council? really?PR 1034201 August 2019For Immediate ReleasePark Road Allotment holders receive six-month extension Following negotiations between Hounslow Council and the Northumberland Estate, agreement has been reached to extend the Park Road allotment holders leases by six-months until September 2020.The Council is committed to working with Syon Park Estate Management to prepare plans for the sustainable management of the Estate, and to design a scheme that meets its objectives whilst continuing to serve the community.This positive agreement will allow all the parties more time to continue discussions to find acceptable ways forward.Cllr Steve Curran, Leader of Hounslow Council, said:“I’m pleased that we have been able to work together to allow the allotment holders to stay on site for a further six months.  I’m hopeful that our continuing dialogue will deliver a solution that is acceptable to all.”Colin Barnes from the Northumberland Estate, said:“We are confident that we will agree a way forward which delivers a good solution for all parties and allowing more time to achieve that makes sense. Both ourselves and the Council want a sustainable future for Syon Park that preserves its heritage and benefits local people and we will work positively to make that happen.”Ends AttachmentsPark Road Allotment holders receive six-month ext Park Road Allotment holders receive six-month ext Media EnquiriesContact: Jini Amarasekara T: 020 8583 5634 M: 07947 137020 (out of hours) E: jini.amarasekara@hounslow.gov.uk

Vanessa Smith ● 2208d1 Comments ● 2208d

Statement on elevated pollution levels at Boston Manor Park

Statement from Hounslow Council on reports of elevated pollution levels at Boston Manor ParkPublished: Tuesday, 4th June 2019 "It has come to our attention that the Air Quality England website reported high levels of pollutant particles at Boston Manor Park in Brentford over the weekend and on Monday 3 June. We are advised that this is likely due to the large-scale set-up for the Junction 2 music event, taking place on the 7-8 June. Organisers have been using power generators and heavy goods vehicles to set up for the event, giving rise to large-scale dust. Particulate matter pollution was measured at one of the borough’s air monitoring station located close to Boston Manor Park.“We would advise that residents avoid the area of Boston Manor Park where the work is taking place while particulate matter levels are at a high level.“However, the current rainfall in the borough will remedy much of the increased pollution since it washes away particulate matter and can also wash out pollutants that are dissolvable”“You can receive air quality alerts by signing up to our free airTEXT service, which sends alerts via SMS text, voicemail message or email when pollution levels are higher than normal for Hounslow. The website provides air quality, UV, pollen and temperature forecasts for the Borough, warns if high pollution is forecast, and provides health advice.For further information and to sign up please see: http://www.airtext.info or text ‘AirTEXT Hounslow’ to 78070” More articles in the news archiveLondon Borough of Hounslow news RSS feed

Bernard Allen ● 2265d3 Comments ● 2261d

Alfa Laval/Brentford Nylons Tower

Does anyone know the current state of play for the re-use and refurbishment of this building? I see that detailed planning permission was granted on 17 January 2017 for the use of the building as a 180-bed hotel and 4,667 square metres of offices. Other buildings were permitted in the same decision notice but it's not clear which, if any, of these form part of the already completed development (the dwellings, Premier Inn etc.) within the old Baltic Centre site.When I went along to a presentation, by Hunter Page Planning, at the Novotel in about September 2015 I got the impression that the plan at that time was for Hyundai to use the tower as their flagship showroom and offices. Is this still the intention?Whatever the precise plans I wonder if there is any indication of a timetable for the refurbishment. Alfa-Laval moved to Camberley in about 1996 and the tower has been derelict since then. It's high time for this eyesore to be given a makeover and for the advertising hoardings to be removed.  As an aside, it may be that about 137 housing units have already been built on the old Baltic Centre (which is now called Westside and includes Baltic Avenue). These were originally described as a mix of private and "affordable" homes and when they first went on the market in 2015 prices began at £310,000. I see from Zoopla that the average price in Baltic Avenue has been £535,000 and a 4-bed unit recently went for £795,000.

Jim Storrar ● 3121d29 Comments ● 2263d

Disregarding History?

It should be a concern for Brentford's history to conserve the Barlow rails alongside Dock Road, many of which have disappeared during the course of demolition and site works opposite Morrisons.Brunel had used his Baulk rails for the Great Western Railway. I have found no details for the rail used in the Great Western and Brentford spur, but presumably these would have to have matched those used in the main line? In 1849 W H Barlow had invented the Barlow Rail profile to be laid direct on ballast without use of sleepers, and Brunel adopted these for the South Wales Railway.These latter went out of general use fairly swiftly, owing to maintenance costs, and large amounts of them were being sold off by the mid to late 1850's, when Brunel's Brentford trans-shipment depot was built (opened in 1859). Use of the rail for fencing is characteristic along Brunel's various railway lines, so retention of even a portion of these along Dock Road would preserve at least a small bit of Brentford's fast vanishing history.Those not so kept should be offered to museums, and hopefully not consigned to scrap metal dealers. I have raised this concern at the last BCC meeting, and councillors have promised to look into this, but I have heard nothing back.Another, related worry, is the amount of site work, drilling and concreting that seems to progress to the detriment of a proper archeological survey of the newly cleared area. This has never been excavated previously, to my knowledge, so it is vitally important that the planning conditions mandating such a survey should be enforced - and this done quickly, before integrity of the site is further compromised, and the plea go up that it would prove all too expensive now that so much work has already been done.

Nigel Moore ● 2421d34 Comments ● 2267d

LBH Wilful Parking Inaction Endangers Lives in Isleworth

The other day we had five ambulances, a fire engine and a police car outside our living room window, trying without success to access the estate on which we live.  The reason for their lack of success was that two cars were parked side by side across the very narrow stretch of Town Field Way which is the sole access and exit from the estate, leaving a gap of less than two feet between them.The West Middlesex estate comprises 143 dwellings and the adjacent White Lodge Close 149 dwellings.  All of the latter and 99 of the former were blocked to vehicles when this double parking took place, a total of 248 households.Incredibly, this road blockage was not the first of its kind.  In fact it happens on an approximately weekly basis and has done for several years since a bay was made available for a Car Club without any restrictions first having been placed upon the space directly opposite.  Anybody using the space opposite the Car Club bay for parking can do so legitimately, and then if a car is returned by a club user that too may lawfully be parked in its allocated bay, creating said blockage of access to and from 248 dwellings.I reported this to one of our ward councillors several years ago, and also to a senior officer dealing with parking at LBH.  Whether it is because I was the person who reported it (and they are certainly petty and insecure enough for this to be the case) or whether it was down to good old-fashioned inefficiency no attempt to rectify the situation (a process which would involve the painting of about 12-15 feet of double yellow lines on one side of the road) has been made at any time during this entire period.Following last week's incident the police have taken it upon themselves to place cones along one side of the road to ensure access.  Are our local councillors (one of whom is the Leader of the Council) at all embarrassed by this?  Presumably if they are they will finally despatch a man with a brush and a can of yellow paint to perform this highly complex and intricate operation in the very near future.  If they don't, then judge for yourselves the level of contempt in which ordinary residents of this borough are held by those who profess to represent them.

Phil Andrews ● 2324d6 Comments ● 2310d

Just how dopeyBackward can LBH get?

A letter today informing that all CPZ applications must be online from now on.That's fine if you have a safe private computer. But the mandatory requests for information are of a nature that is not supposed to be copied or transmitted. Lot's of work venues including our own now prevent scanning of documents and emailing or transmitting them.But spare a thought for the great many who do not have internet access and in particular safe internet access. Or cannot use a computer let along a scanner.Nowhere on this latest missive is any sort of information on what to do if you are not internet savvy. ( It is still 40% of over 60s and rises with age as many who are able find eyesight and arthritis and age related ailments hinder easy use of the devices most of us take for granted.Not a telephone number, name or postal address.  Email or web contact only.The advice given out is to go to  or library or get someone else to do it online for you.However that is actually a breach of the data protection act and in most cases such procedures would need proof of power of attorney for matters which handle documents and personal details.This " advice" also completely contradicts all the advice for less able computer users to stay safe.Never ever input personal details,or documents onto a public computer or a shared computer.So for those few why is this council not signed up to the Keep Me Posted initiative to stop this nasty and stressful mentality stressing so many less able people.?

Raymond Havelock ● 2337d5 Comments ● 2336d

Last chance for Brentford?

This might be a TLDR for some - if so, apologies in advance. Mr DC and I went for a walk in the winter sunshine yesterday afternoon. We looked at the south side of the High Street and felt utter despair; almost everything closed, demolition on the horizon. The gross vandalism of Georgian and Victorian buildings. (Even the less lovely building opposite Morrison’s and the Beehive… history and interest doesn’t have to be 200 years old and pretty. The County Court is a good case in point.)What’s to become of the beautiful NatWest building? It had a fantastic interior, even when overlaid with panelling and plastic. The building that housed the Post Office? Look above street level at the roof line and at the windows. It’s fantastic. Peel away the crummy PO frontage and it’s a gem. Even the building next door to that (Paddy Power at street level) – just slightly pre-war, I’d guess – has a decorative brickwork detail that someone had thought about. It wasn’t just thrown together. Go and have a look; cast your eyes above the ground floor and take it in. Not for the first time, I reflected upon the tricks missed by Hounslow Council, and the developers who will lay waste to swathes of the area’s history and charm, replacing it with serried ranks of cookie-cutter developments of absolutely no architectural merit whatsoever. What a shame.It’s the depressing lack of imagination and complete lack of understanding of what makes a cohesive community that gets to me the most. These new developments simply don’t work. Let me explain.I remember visiting a friend living in Bermondsey a while back. I don’t know if you know the area, but as recently as 20 years ago, Bermondsey was pretty grim. (Ditto Shoreditch – and look what’s happened there - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/10571976/In-defence-of-the-Shoreditchification-of-London.html) After dinner, we went for a walk. Around us lay Maltby Street, where thriving businesses have been built out of railway arches, Ropewalk and Druid Street, full of people and life, and Bermondsey Street itself, buzzing with restaurants, bars, galleries and independent shops. We turned a corner – suddenly we were in the piazza of a new development, surrounded by new-build monoliths. Devoid of people, the only lights on were at Gregg’s Table, the ‘concept’ restaurant and brainchild of Gregg Wallace from MasterChef. It was empty. (I believe it’s now closed down.) It was a ghost town – and the contrast could not have been greater. And that’s what’s lined up for the south side of Brentford High Street. If someone – anyone – had employed a little imagination, the old buildings of Brentford would not have been slated for demolition. If someone – anyone – had thought that by refurbishing these buildings and letting them at affordable prices, it would have attracted small businesses and creative industries to the area. They would need to eat lunch and shop, thereby organically creating a demand for services from other small businesses (and some larger ones). Those people might eventually want to live nearer to their work, creating a demand for accommodation. All of this would be paying scads of cash into Hounslow’s coffers, only they’re too damned short-term and greedy to think like that. With thought, sensitivity and far-sightedness, Brentford could rival Chiswick for the title of Hounslow’s cash cow – AND leave current residents in place. But no… much easier sell off one of the last ‘affordable’ parts of riverside London by the pound, pull everything down and build a giant Gregg’s Table, but with even less charm and longevity.  Here’s the thing: flats don’t attract people – a vibrant, functional community does. Building hundreds and thousands of flats, to be sold off-plan and offshore, does not benefit Brentford one iota. Does Hounslow Council not care or are they just too stupid to understand? We find ourselves on a cusp here: the falling pound, the Brexit fiasco, a looming lack of construction workers… it all adds up to the sort of situation that gives developers the fear. Is it possible to stop at least some of this madness? Surely they now want out? The hideous and utterly unwanted Morrison’s development, for instance? Could some money be poured into Watermans to turn it into the Little South Bank that it could and should be? Could some forward-thinking, imaginative people be employed to cherish what’s already here, give it a little TLC and make it… sexy? It's not impossible; look what's happened to the Albany Arms. Having said that, it was rescued, by the skin of its teeth, from being turned into... flats. Kudos to Peter, Ash and James for not letting that happen - and we must support them so that it doesn't happen in the future. Destruction takes seconds. When our environment is gone, it's gone. There are no second chances. Come on, Brentfordonians – what do you think? Is there still time?

Tracie Dudley Craig ● 2392d54 Comments ● 2352d

New Ealing ePetition about those Dockless bikes

Are you happy with the way these new bikes just landed on our streets? Within weeks they seemed to become randomly distributed around all our local roads left in an amazing variety of inconvenient places – often on their side and some have even been seen in rivers.There’s a new petition about this on the Ealing Council website & there’s a separate one for Hounslow – see below)https://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/E-petitions.aspxOBJECTIVES1. To have a council debate2. The council then to agree to a public consultation (same as Hounslow council - https://haveyoursay.hounslow.gov.uk/traffic-and-transport/dockless/consultation/intro/ )3. Ealing council to agree to a complete scheme review based on the results of the public consultation  • These are commercial schemes which should be creating a new, flexible and cheap choice of transport.  • Instead, many users seem to ignore pedestrians who might just want to walk on uncluttered pavements and roads    o With blocked thoroughfares life gets harder.    o Harder for the young    o Harder for Mums with buggies or pushchairs    o Harder for our more elderly neighbours    o Harder even for the users – who wants to get to a bike on the app at the end of a cul de sac?  • Any other type of pavement/road blockage is often regarded as unlawful  • There was recent news came that the bikes had also been used in drug related crime  • If the gps technology is vandalised they can simply go off grid and are left  • If the batteries run down the operators say they can simply go off grid and “disappear”  • It can also be argued the schemes are in breach of the tfl code of practice   • http://content.tfl.gov.uk/dockless-bike-share-code-of-practice.pdf  • There simply seems to be no scheme management at all which is not consistent with what tfl seem to think is appropriateThe petition on the council website (https://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/E-petitions.aspx) needs 1500 signatures to “win” a council debate The deadline for the 1500 signatures is March 18th

Don Tanswell ● 2364d5 Comments ● 2354d

Brentford is closed!

From Brentford Today on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/groups/brentfordtoday/permalink/374200276675074/?__tn__=K-RTHE GREAT BALLYMORE SILENCEBRENTFORD IS CLOSED. WE'LL TELL YOU WHAT'S HAPPENING – IN SIX MONTHS' TIME! AS ANGER AND SUSPICION GROW, THE TOWN GETS IMPATIENT.As half the high street turns into a ghost town, and Brentford people wait for snippets from on high, Councillor Mel Collins puts it succinctly: "The drip-drip effect just fuels anger and suspicion to the local community."Bang on, Mel.Cllr Collins adds: "We are in exciting times. Let us be open and celebrate the fact."Then he pleads rather desperately: "Is it possible to give a more comprehensive outline as to what is actually happening over the next few months?"Good question. So Brentford Today put it to Ballymore HQ. External Affairs Manager Jennifer Ball said: "Thanks for reaching out. In terms of further communications, we will be opening an information centre on site this summer, which will feature exhibition space and site models. We are working towards the launch of this amenity intended to engage and inform local people, and improve awareness of plans. More news on this will be available in the coming months."IN THE COMING MONTHS! THIS SUMMER! Are they joking? If they want to engage us, they are going the wrong way about it.Council leader Steve Curran seems as frustrated as anyone. He says: “I’m already in discussion with Ballymore to ensure that we have clear communications by the end of January.”However that's just a "discussion". Ballymore's official position refers to "summer" and "months".Surely Brentford deserves better than this. The south side looks like one of those Wild West ghost towns after the gold mines run out. It'll soon fall down on its own, with tumbleweed blowing along the footpath. You walk past shutters and barred doors and find the post office which bears a scribbled note: closed.Brentford's heart is in cardiac arrest.Well, if it's going to be redeveloped, you'd expect closures at some point. Understandable. What you don't expect is the utter lack of detailed information. It's rude, it's disrespectful. Look on Hounslow council's website. Almost nothing. Look on Ballymore's website. "Reinvention Meets Restoration," it says. "16,250 sq m of new retail floorspace, a 3000 sq m grocery store, a gym and leisure centre and an arts centre/cinema. Retaining several heritage buildings and thoroughfares…"Where's the detail? Where's the plan?Or don't ordinary Brentford people matter?Cllr Guy Lambert says they are "pressing our friends Ballymore to communicate more speedily!" Note the word "friends". Nobody wants to fall out. Ballymore are big and powerful but this is not some minor development on the outskirts. It is right at the heart of Brentford – half the high street is about to be knocked down – hence it is called Regeneration. It's not just a few flats. It's Brentford itself. The biggest change in a generation, perhaps ever.People are asking, quite rightly: "Why are we not being kept fully informed?" Otherwise confidence in the project is being undermined, day by day.Brentford Today stands with Cllr Curran. The people of Brentford need to be told exactly what is happening. And when. They need to be told very soon.

Reg Ghosh ● 2417d32 Comments ● 2368d